| Literature DB >> 29209035 |
Otto F Barak1,2, Suzana Mladinov3, Ryan L Hoiland4, Joshua C Tremblay5, Stephen R Thom6, Ming Yang6, Tanja Mijacika2, Zeljko Dujic7.
Abstract
The aims of this study were: (1) to test whether oscillatory shear stress further exacerbates endothelial dysfunction in patients with moderate-severe COPD, and (2) to test whether low flow oxygen administration improves endothelial function and is protective against oscillatory shear stress-induced endothelial dysfunction in patients with moderate-severe COPD. In 17 patients and 10 age-matched non-smoking control subjects we examined brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and circulating microparticles before and after 20 minutes of experimentally-induced oscillatory shear stress. COPD patients performed this intervention a second time following a 20-minute wash in period of low flow supplemental oxygen to normalize arterial oxygen saturation. COPD patients had ~six-fold greater baseline retrograde shear rate (P < 0.05) and lower FMD (P < 0.05). The oscillatory shear stress intervention induced significant decreases in brachial artery FMD of all groups (P < 0.05). Oscillatory shear stress elevated circulating markers of endothelial cell apoptosis (CD31+/CD41b- microparticles) in COPD patients, but not age-matched controls. Supplemental oxygen administration abrogated the oscillatory shear stress-induced increase in CD31+/CD41b- microparticles, and improved FMD after accounting for the shear stress stimulus. We have demonstrated that acutely disturbed blood flow with increased retrograde shear stress further deteriorates the already impaired endothelial function with attendant endothelial apoptosis in patients with moderate-severe COPD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29209035 PMCID: PMC5717042 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17249-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of the study population.
| Control subjects | COPD | |
|---|---|---|
| (n = 10) | (n = 17) | |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 65.3 (7.3) | 69.0 (8.1) |
| Sex (male), No. (%) | 7 (70.0) | 11 (64.7) |
| Height (cm), mean (SD) | 174.5 (9.0) | 170.6 (8.0) |
| Weight (kg), mean (SD) | 89.1 (13.3) | 76.5 (16.8) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 29.3 (4.0) | 26.2 (5.2) |
| Cigarette smoking status | ||
| Current, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (23.5) |
| Former, No. (%) | 4 (40.0) | 11 (64.7) |
| Non-smoker, No. (%) | 6 (60.0) | 2 (11.8) |
| Smoking pack-years, mean (SD) | 28.8 (22.5) | 54.3 (62.8) |
| Hypertension, No. (%) | 4 (40.0) | 11 (64.7) |
| Diabetes mellitus, No. (%) | 1 (10.0) | 3 (17.6) |
| Coronary artery disease, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.9) |
| Peripheral artery disease, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (11.8) |
| Medication use | ||
| β-blockers, No. (%) | 1 (10.0) | 4 (23.5) |
| Calcium channel blockers, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (17.6) |
| ACE inhibitors or angiotensin antagonists, No. (%) | 0 (10.0) | 8 (47.1) |
| Diuretics, No. (%) | 1 (10.0) | 12 (70.6) |
| Statins, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.9) |
| Acetylsalicylic acid, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (11.8) |
| Inhaled corticosteroids, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 14 (82.4) |
| Systemic corticosteroids, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.9) |
| Short-acting β-agonists, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (23.5) |
| Long-acting β-agonists, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 17 (100.0) |
| Short-acting anticholinergics, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (17.6) |
| Long-acting anticholinergics, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 13 (76.5) |
| Theophylline, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (41.2) |
| Roflumilast, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (11.8) |
| Methyldigoxine, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.9) |
| Ivabradine, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.9) |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg), mean (SD) | 133.0 (18.7) | 133.2 (21.8) |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg), mean (SD) | 84.0 (7.4) | 78.8 (12.6) |
| FEV1 (% of predicted), mean (SD) | 107.3 (22.5) | 31.8 (11.0) |
| FVC (% of predicted), mean (SD) | 110.8 (24.6) | 52.3 (10.8) |
| FEV1/FVC ratio (%), mean (SD) | 77.7 (6.0) | 45.9 (10.1) |
| FEF25–75 (% of predicted), mean (SD) | 88.9 (23.4) | 10.9 (4.3) |
| SaO2 (%), mean (SD) | 96.4 (1.0) | 88.2 (3.7) |
| PaO2 (kPa), mean (SD) | 7.2 (0.9) | |
| PaCO2 (kPa), mean (SD) | 6.3 (1.0) | |
| pH, mean (SD) | 7.42 (0.03) | |
| HCO3 (mmol/L), mean (SD) | 30.5 (4.9) | |
| Home oxygen therapy, No. (%) | 14 (82.4) | |
| O2 washout period (h), mean (SD) | 6.5 (5.8) | |
| Severity of airflow limitation (GOLD) | ||
| Stage 1, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Stage 2, No. (%) | 1 (5.9) | |
| Stage 3, No. (%) | 6 (35.3) | |
| Stage 4, No. (%) | 10 (58.8) | |
| Dyspnea grade (mMRC), mean (SD) | 3.4 (0.6) | |
| Acute exacerbations ≥2 per year, No. (%) | 12 (70.6) | |
| Combined COPD assesment | ||
| Group A, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Group B, No. (%) | 1 (5.9) | |
| Group C, No. (%) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Group D, No. (%) | 16 (94.1) | |
COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC = forced vital capacity; FEF25–75 = forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC; SaO2 = arterial blood oxygen saturation; PaO2 = arterial blood oxygen tension; PaCO2 = arterial blood carbon dioxide tension; GOLD = Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; mMRC = modified Medical Research Council.
Blood pressure and oxygen saturation of subjects before and after the intervention Values are mean ± SD.
| COPD patients - room air | COPD patients - 100% O2 | Control subjects | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre intervention | Post intervention | Pre intervention | Post intervention | Pre intervention | Post intervention | |
| SBP (mmHg) | 130.9 ± 18.3 | 131.2 ± 17.5 | 130.0 ± 17.8 | 133.2 ± 21.1 | 132.5 ± 18.7 | 133.5 ± 18.3 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 78.2 ± 11.9 | 77.6 ± 9.7 | 77.9 ± 9.8 | 79.2 ± 13.3 | 83.0 ± 7.1 | 84.0 ± 7.0 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 95.8 ± 13.5 | 95.5 ± 11.5 | 95.3 ± 11.9 | 97.2 ± 15.4 | 99.5 ± 10.8 | 100.5 ± 10.4 |
| SaO2 (%) | 88.1 ± 3.8 | 87.9 ± 3.7 | 97.1 ± 1.2* | 97.1 ± 0.9* | 96.8 ± 1.0† | 96.9 ± 0.9† |
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure, SaO2, oxygen saturation.
*Indicates significant difference between room air and 100% O2 conditions (P < 0.05).
†Indicates significant difference between COPD patients and control subjects at room air condition (pre and post intervention) (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Shear rate patterns (panel A) and oscillatory shear index (OSI) (panel B) before and during (10th and 20th minute) the intervention of cuff inflation to 75 mmHg on the experimental arm. Data of anterograde and retrograde shear rates (panel A) and oscillatory shear index (panel B) are presented for COPD patients exposed to room air (black bars) and 100% oxygen (light grey bars) and control subjects breathing room air (dark grey bars). Error bars represent SD. *Indicates significant difference between groups ( P< 0.05). †Indicates significant difference from baseline (P < 0.05).
Figure 2COPD and control subject FMD of the experimental arm following elevated retrograde shear. There was a main effect of retrograde shear ( P< 0.05) during the COPD trials in room air and during oxygen breathing. In the control subjects, FMD was similarly reduced (P < 0.05) following elevated retrograde shear during room air breathing.
Brachial artery flow mediated dilation pre and post intervention on the experimental arm.
| COPD patients – Room air | COPD patients - 100% oxygen | Control subjects | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre intervention | Post intervention | Pre intervention | Post intervention | Pre intervention | Post intervention | |
| Baseline diameter (mm) | 4.69 ± 0.87 | 4.81 ± 0.81 | 4.74 ± 0.87 | 4.71 ± 0.91 | 6.49 ± 0.77† | 6.45 ± 0.76† |
| Peak diameter (mm) | 4.92 ± 0.92 | 5.01 ± 0.85 | 5.01 ± 0.91 | 4.94 ± 0.93 | 7.01 ± 0.86† | 6.77 ± 0.81† |
| Time to peak (s) | 107.3 ± 31.6 | 93.9 ± 29.0 | 92.9 ± 22.5 | 91.6 ± 24.9 | 94.6 ± 23.2 | 89.7 ± 24.4 |
| FMD (mm) | 0.24 ± 0.09 | 0.21 ± 0.07* | 0.27 ± 0.07 | 0.23 ± 0.05* | 0.52 ± 0.15† | 0.32 ± 0.12*† |
| SRAUC (s−1) | 25876 ± 9985 | 17507 ± 6005* | 18252 ± 6732†† | 14198 ± 3976*†† | 26124 ± 5289 | 21811 ± 5289* |
*Indicates significant difference between pre and post intervention measures (P < 0.05).
†Indicates significant difference between COPD and control subjects at room air conditions (pre and post intervention) ( P< 0.05).
††Indicates significant difference between COPD patients – Room air and COPD patients – 100% oxygen (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Baseline and post intervention MP levels in COPD patients breathing room air and 100% oxygen. Room air values are represented by white box plots, and the O2 reversal data by grey patterned box plots. *Indicates significant difference from room air pre-retrograde. †Indicates significant difference from O2 reversal pre-retrograde.