Vimal Remy1, Vineesh Krishnan2, Tisson V Job3, Madhavankutty S Ravisankar4, C V Renjith Raj5, Seena John6. 1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kannur Dental College, Kannur, Kerala, India, e-mail: vimalremy@gmail.com. 2. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Mookambika Institute of Dental Sciences, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Educare Institute of Dental Sciences, Malappuram, Kerala, India. 4. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Science, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala India. 5. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Malabar Dental College & Research Centre, Malappuram, Kerala, India. 6. Department of Pedodontics, Kannur Dental College, Kannur Kerala, India.
Abstract
AIM: This study aims to compare the marginal adaptation and sealing ability [mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Fillapex, AH Plus, Endofill sealers] of root canal sealers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, the inclusion criteria include 45 single-rooted extracted mandibular premolar teeth, with single canal and complete root formation. The sectioning of the samples was done at the cementoenamel junction using a low-speed diamond disc. Step-back technique was used to prepare root canals manually. The MTA-Fillapex, AH Plus, and Endofill sealers were the three experimental sealer groups to which 45 teeth were distributed. Under scanning electron microscope (SEM), marginal gap at sealer and root dentin interface were examined at coronal and apical halves of root canal. RESULTS: Among the three maximum marginal adaptations were seen with AH Plus sealer (4.10 ± 0.10) which is followed by Endofill sealer (1.44 ± 0.18) and MTA-Fillapex sealer (0.80 ± 0.22). Between the coronal and apical marginal adaptation, significant statistical difference (p = 0.001) was seen in AH Plus sealer. When a Mann-Whitney U-test was done on MTA-Fillapex sealer vs AH Plus sealer and AH Plus sealer vs Endofill sealer, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) found between the above two groups at coronal and apical third. CONCLUSION: The present study proves that AH Plus sealer has a better marginal adaptation when compared with other sealers used. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: For sealing space of crown wall and main cone in root canal treatment, sealers play an important role. The other advantages of sealers are that they are used to fill voids and irregularities in root channel, secondary, lateral channels, and space between applied gutta-percha cones and also act as tripper during filling.
AIM: This study aims to compare the marginal adaptation and sealing ability [mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Fillapex, AH Plus, Endofill sealers] of root canal sealers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study, the inclusion criteria include 45 single-rooted extracted mandibular premolar teeth, with single canal and complete root formation. The sectioning of the samples was done at the cementoenamel junction using a low-speed diamond disc. Step-back technique was used to prepare root canals manually. The MTA-Fillapex, AH Plus, and Endofill sealers were the three experimental sealer groups to which 45 teeth were distributed. Under scanning electron microscope (SEM), marginal gap at sealer and root dentin interface were examined at coronal and apical halves of root canal. RESULTS: Among the three maximum marginal adaptations were seen with AH Plus sealer (4.10 ± 0.10) which is followed by Endofill sealer (1.44 ± 0.18) and MTA-Fillapex sealer (0.80 ± 0.22). Between the coronal and apical marginal adaptation, significant statistical difference (p = 0.001) was seen in AH Plus sealer. When a Mann-Whitney U-test was done on MTA-Fillapex sealer vs AH Plus sealer and AH Plus sealer vs Endofill sealer, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) found between the above two groups at coronal and apical third. CONCLUSION: The present study proves that AH Plus sealer has a better marginal adaptation when compared with other sealers used. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: For sealing space of crown wall and main cone in root canal treatment, sealers play an important role. The other advantages of sealers are that they are used to fill voids and irregularities in root channel, secondary, lateral channels, and space between applied gutta-percha cones and also act as tripper during filling.
Entities:
Keywords:
AH Plus; Endofill; Marginal adaptation; Mineral trioxide aggregate-fillapex Scanning electron microscope.