Sheryl L Coley1, Jasmine Y Zapata2, Rebecca J Schwei3, Glen Ellen Mihalovic4, Maya N Matabele5, Elizabeth A Jacobs6, Cynthie K Anderson7. 1. Health Disparities Research Scholars Program, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: scoley2@wisc.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Preventive Medicine and Public Health Residency Program, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Dell Medical School, University of Texas Austin, Austin, Texas. 7. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: African American mothers and other mothers of historically underserved populations consistently have higher rates of adverse birth outcomes than White mothers. Increasing prenatal care use among these mothers may reduce these disparities. Most prenatal care research focuses on prenatal care adequacy rather than concepts of quality. Even less research examines the dual perspectives of African American mothers and prenatal care providers. In this qualitative study, we compared perceptions of prenatal care quality between African American and mixed race mothers and prenatal care providers. METHODS: Prenatal care providers (n = 20) and mothers who recently gave birth (n = 19) completed semistructured interviews. Using a thematic analysis approach and Donabedian's conceptual model of health care quality, interviews were analyzed to identify key themes and summarize differences in perspectives between providers and mothers. FINDINGS: Mothers and providers valued the tailoring of care based on individual needs and functional patient-provider relationships as key elements of prenatal care quality. Providers acknowledged the need for knowing the social context of patients, but mothers and providers differed in perspectives of "culturally sensitive" prenatal care. Although most mothers had positive prenatal care experiences, mothers also recalled multiple complications with providers' negative assumptions and disregard for mothers' options in care. CONCLUSIONS: Exploring strategies to strengthen patient-provider interactions and communication during prenatal care visits remains critical to address for facilitating continuity of care for mothers of color. These findings warrant further investigation of dual patient and provider perspectives of culturally sensitive prenatal care to address the service needs of African American and mixed race mothers.
INTRODUCTION: African American mothers and other mothers of historically underserved populations consistently have higher rates of adverse birth outcomes than White mothers. Increasing prenatal care use among these mothers may reduce these disparities. Most prenatal care research focuses on prenatal care adequacy rather than concepts of quality. Even less research examines the dual perspectives of African American mothers and prenatal care providers. In this qualitative study, we compared perceptions of prenatal care quality between African American and mixed race mothers and prenatal care providers. METHODS: Prenatal care providers (n = 20) and mothers who recently gave birth (n = 19) completed semistructured interviews. Using a thematic analysis approach and Donabedian's conceptual model of health care quality, interviews were analyzed to identify key themes and summarize differences in perspectives between providers and mothers. FINDINGS: Mothers and providers valued the tailoring of care based on individual needs and functional patient-provider relationships as key elements of prenatal care quality. Providers acknowledged the need for knowing the social context of patients, but mothers and providers differed in perspectives of "culturally sensitive" prenatal care. Although most mothers had positive prenatal care experiences, mothers also recalled multiple complications with providers' negative assumptions and disregard for mothers' options in care. CONCLUSIONS: Exploring strategies to strengthen patient-provider interactions and communication during prenatal care visits remains critical to address for facilitating continuity of care for mothers of color. These findings warrant further investigation of dual patient and provider perspectives of culturally sensitive prenatal care to address the service needs of African American and mixed race mothers.
Authors: Katy B Kozhimannil; Carrie A Vogelsang; Rachel R Hardeman; Shailendra Prasad Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Valerie A Earnshaw; Lisa Rosenthal; Shayna D Cunningham; Trace Kershaw; Jessica Lewis; Sharon Schindler Rising; Emily Stasko; Jonathan Tobin; Jeannette R Ickovics Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2015-11-03
Authors: Molly R Altman; Amelia R Gavin; Meghan K Eagen-Torkko; Ira Kantrowitz-Gordon; Rue M Khosa; Selina A Mohammed Journal: Glob Qual Nurs Res Date: 2021-03-31