Literature DB >> 29208077

Response Time Consistency Is an Indicator of Executive Control Rather than Global Cognitive Ability.

Brandon P Vasquez1, Malcolm A Binns1, Nicole D Anderson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Intraindividual variability increases with age, but the relative strength of association with cognitive domains is still unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the relation between cognitive domains and the shape and spread of response time (RT) distributions as indexed by intraindividual standard deviation (ISD), and ex-Gaussian parameters (μ, σ, τ).
METHODS: Healthy adults (40 young [aged 18-30 years], 40 young-old [aged 65-74 years], and 41 old-old [aged 75-85 years]) completed neuropsychological testing and a touch-screen attention task from which ISD and ex-Gaussian parameters were derived. The relation between RT performance and cognitive domains (memory, processing speed, executive functioning) was examined with structural equation modeling (SEM), and the predictive power of RT distribution indices over age was investigated with linear regression.
RESULTS: ISD, μ, and τ, but not σ, showed a linear increase with age group. An SEM showed that independent of age, τ was most strongly associated with executive functioning, while μ exhibited less critical associations. Linear regression indicated that μ and τ explained a significant portion of variance in processing speed and executive ability in addition to age group. Memory was more parsimoniously predicted by age, without any significant contribution of ex-Gaussian parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that exceptionally slow responses convey attention lapses through wavering of cognitive control, which strongly correspond to executive functioning tests. General slowing and extremely slow responses predicted processing speed and executive performance beyond age group, indicating that RT metrics are sensitive to differences in cognitive ability. (JINS, 2018, 24, 456-465).

Keywords:  Aging; Cognitive control; Cognitive domains; Ex-Gaussian; Executive functions; Intraindividual variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29208077     DOI: 10.1017/S1355617717001266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Non-Gaussian Distributional Analyses of Reaction Times (RT): Improvements that Increase Efficacy of RT Tasks for Describing Cognitive Processes.

Authors:  David C Osmon; Dmitriy Kazakov; Octavio Santos; Michelle T Kassel
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  The Impact of a Sustained Cognitive Engagement Intervention on Cognitive Variability: The Synapse Project.

Authors:  Christopher R Brydges; Allison A M Bielak
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2019-06-05

3.  Bridging the gap between performance-based assessment and self-reported everyday functioning: An ecological momentary assessment approach.

Authors:  Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe; Catherine Sumida; Diane J Cook
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  The impact of micronutrient supplementation in alcohol-exposed pregnancies on reaction time responses of preschoolers in Ukraine.

Authors:  J A Kable; C D Coles; C L Keen; J Y Uriu-Adams; K L Jones; L Yevtushok; Y Kulikovsky; N Zymak-Zakutnya; Iryna Dubchak; D Akhmedzhanova; W Wertelecki; C D Chambers
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.405

5.  Cognition in Context: Understanding the Everyday Predictors of Cognitive Performance in a New Era of Measurement.

Authors:  Emma Weizenbaum; John Torous; Daniel Fulford
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Bilingualism is always cognitively advantageous, but this doesn't mean what you think it means.

Authors:  Guilherme Sanches de Oliveira; Maggie Bullock Oliveira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-16

7.  Heterogeneous Indicators of Cognitive Performance and Performance Variability Across the Lifespan.

Authors:  Lauren A Rutter; Ipsit V Vahia; Brent P Forester; Kerry J Ressler; Laura Germine
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.750

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.