| Literature DB >> 29207853 |
Wonki Yoon1, Woo-Keun Kwon1,2, Omar Choudhri3, Jaegeun Ahn4, Hanyong Huh4, Choel Ji4, Huy M Do5, Aditya Mantha6, Sin-Soo Jeun7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The feasibility and usefulness of transradial catheterization for coronary and neuro-intervention are well known. However, the anatomical change in the catheterized radial artery (RA) is not well understood. Herein, we present the results of ultrasonographic observation of the RA after routine transradial cerebral angiography (TRCA).Entities:
Keywords: Cerebral Angiography; Radial Artery; Ultrasonography
Year: 2017 PMID: 29207853 PMCID: PMC5769853 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Neurosurg Soc ISSN: 1225-8245
Demographics of patients undergoing transradial cerebral angiography
| Category | Value |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Female | 102 (56) |
| Male | 79 (44) |
| Age | 61.2 (62.0–69.0) |
| Hypertension | 106 (59) |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 31 (17) |
| Diabetes | 43 (24) |
| Smoking | 47 (26) |
| Total procedures per patient | |
| 1 | 146 (81) |
| 2 | 25 (14) |
| 3 | 8 (4) |
| 4 | 2 (1) |
Values are presented as number (%) or number (95% confidence interval)
Preoperative radial artery diameter by demographic characteristic and procedure number
| Category | Value[ | Mean (mm) | SD (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Female | 124 | 2.26 | 0.42 |
| Male | 99 | 2.74 | 0.41 |
| Hypertension | |||
| Present | 126 | 2.57 | 0.50 |
| Absent | 97 | 2.33 | 0.41 |
| Procedure No. | |||
| 1st | 178 | 2.49 | 0.48 |
| 2nd | 33 | 2.42 | 0.51 |
| 3rd/4th | 12 | 2.48 | 0.37 |
Indicates total number of procedures.
SD : standard deviation
Mixed effects model predicting radial artery diamater change due to intervention, controlling for demographic, health behavior, and comorbidities
| Univariable | Multivariable | |
|---|---|---|
| Male | -0.09 (-0.22–0.04) | -0.05 (-0.19–0.10) |
| Age group | -0.01 (-0.08–0.05) | 0.02 (-0.04–0.09) |
| Hypertension | -0.11 (-0.24–0.02) | -0.10 (-0.23–0.04) |
| Hypercholesterolemia | -0.21 (-0.38– -0.04)[ | -0.24 (-0.41–0.06)[ |
| Smoking | -0.08 (-0.22–0.07) | -0.04 (-0.20–0.13) |
| Diabetes | -0.06 (-0.21–0.09) | -0.00 (-0.15–0.15) |
| Months from previous procedure | 0.02 (0.01–0.03)[ | -0.01 (-0.03–0.01) |
| Multiple procedures | ||
| 2nd | 0.26 (0.10–0.43)[ | 0.30 (0.07–0.54)[ |
| 3rd/4th | 0.52 (0.25–0.79)[ | 0.66 (0.27–1.05)[ |
Values are presented as coefficient (95% confidence interval).
p <0.05.
p <0.01.
p <0.001.
Frequency of complications among patients undergoing transradial cerebral angiography
| Complication | Value |
|---|---|
| Aneurysm | 5 (2.2) |
| Dissection | 2 (0.9) |
| Fistula | 1 (0.4) |
| Hematoma | 2 (0.9) |
| Thrombosis | 9 (4.0) |
| Occlusion | 4 (1.8) |
| Stenosis | 3 (2.2) |
| Total[ | 26/22 (9.6) |
| Intimal hyperplasia | 12 (5.3) |
Values are presented as number (%).
Total complication cases were 22 (9.6%) but some of them had multiple features simultaneously. Positive findings were 34 cases including intimal hyperplasia
Frequency of abnormal Doppler findings according to the single or multiple procedures
| Procedure sequence | Doppler findings | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Intimal hyperplasia | Complication | ||
| 1st prcd | 149 (83.71) | 8 (4.49) | 21 (11.80) | 178 (100) |
| 2nd/3rd/4th prcd | 40 (88.89) | 4 (8.89) | 1 (2.22) | 45 (100) |
| Total | 194 (87.00) | 12 (5.38) | 22 (9.87) | 223 (100) |
Values are presented as number (%). prcd : procedure
Difference of pre-procedural RA diameter on the first or single procedure according to the Doppler findings
| Findings in follow-up DVS | Pre-procedure diameter of radial artery | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Standard deviation | Frequency | |
| Normal | 2.53 | 0.46 | 149 |
| Complications | 2.32 | 0.53 | 21 |
| Hyperplasia | 2.09 | 0.25 | 8 |
| Total | 2.48 | 0.47 | 178 |
RA : radial artery, DUS : Doppler ultrasonography
Fig. 1.A case of radial artery occlusion. A : This shows a pre-procedural normal radial artery with an intact lumen and vessel wall. B : This is the normal Doppler wave-form of the ulnar artery at the post-procedure follow-up. C : In contrast to (A) and (B), there is vague echogenicity in the lumen, which is assumed to indicate thrombus formation. D : The Doppler shows an obstructive wave pattern.
Fig. 2.Doppler ultrasonographic findings of various complications. A and B : A dissection of a radial artery in cross-sectional and longitudinal view. Note the double lumen sign. In the Doppler image that is not shown in this figure, the false lumen did not have any blood flow signal. C : An aneurysmal change in the radial artery around the puncture site (asterisk). D and E : A pseudoaneurysm case in Doppler and gray scale images. The pseudoaneurysm sac does not appear to have a proper wall and shows mixed Doppler signals due to the turbulent blood flow. F : A case of arteriovenous fistula.