| Literature DB >> 29207143 |
Ruirong Wan1, Aiqun Liu1, Xiaoqiong Hou1, Zongqiang Lai1, Jieping Li1, Nuo Yang1, Juntao Tan1, Fengzhen Mo1, Zixi Hu1, Xiaomei Yang1, Yongxiang Zhao1, Xiaoling Lu1.
Abstract
Cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte antigen‑4 (CTLA‑4) is a critical negative regulator of immune responses. CTLA‑4 is rapidly upregulated following T‑cell activation, and then binds to B7 molecules with a higher affinity than CD28. CTLA‑4 may abolish the initiation of the responses of T cells by raising the threshold of signals required for full activation of T cells, and it also may terminate ongoing T-cell responses. This regulatory role has led to the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) designed to block CTLA‑4 activity for enhancing immune responses against cancer. mAbs have several disadvantages including high production cost and unstable behavior. Nanobodies (Nbs) are single‑domain antigen‑binding fragments derived from the camelid heavy‑chain antibodies, which are highly attractive in cancer immunotherapy due to their small size, high specificity, and stability. We selected CTLA‑4‑specific Nbs from a high quality dromedary camel immune library by phage display technology. Four positive colonies were sequenced and classified based on the amino acids sequences in the CDR3 region. These Nbs recognized unique epitopes on CTLA‑4 and displayed high binding rates when used on PHA‑stimulated human T cells. Treatment of B16 melanoma‑bearing C57BL/6 mice with anti‑CTLA‑4 nanobody 16 (Nb16) delayed melanoma growth and prolonged the survival time of mice. These data indicate that anti‑CTLA‑4 Nbs selected from a high quality phage display library may be effective for the treatment of patients with tumors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29207143 PMCID: PMC5783618 DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.6131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Rep ISSN: 1021-335X Impact factor: 3.906
Figure 1.Schematic of the strategy for constructing the immunized library.
Figure 2.Construction of the VHH library. (A) The VHH genes were obtained by two-step PCR. (B) The library size was measured by counting the number of colonies after gradient dilution. (C) Twenty-four colonies were randomly selected to estimate the correct insertion rate by PCR amplification.
Figure 3.Selection of nanobodies (Nbs) against CTLA-4 by phage display library. (A) Enrichment (198-fold) of CTLA-4-specific VHHs after 3 rounds of panning. (B) Identification of 24 positive clones following PE-ELISA of 96 clones. An optical density (OD) ratio >2 was considered as positive.
Figure 4.Phage display library derived against CTLA-4 nanobodies (Nbs). (A) Four types of different amino acid sequences of anti-CTLA-4 VHHs were identified. (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified Nbs.
Figure 5.Flow cytometric analysis of nanobodies (Nbs) on PHA-stimulated T cells. Anti-CTLA-4 mAb and irrelevant Nb were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. mAb, monoclonal antibody.
Figure 6.Anti-melanoma activity of anti-CTLA-4 Nb16. (A) Melanoma tumor growth curves of C57BL/6 mice. (B) Survival percentage of melanoma-bearing mice. Each curve represents three independent experiments of 6 mice/group. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001; NS indicates no significant difference.