Literature DB >> 29207063

Forskolin attenuates retinal inflammation in diabetic mice.

Zhi-Peng You1, Bin Xiong1, Yu-Lan Zhang1, Lu Shi1, Ke Shi1.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of forskolin on retinal inflammation under diabetic conditions. C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into normal control, diabetic control and forskolin treatment groups. The diabetic model was established by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin. The forskolin treatment group received intragastrical administration of forskolin for 12 weeks, the other two groups received an equal amount of PBS. At 21 weeks following diabetic induction, an immunoblotting test was conducted to investigate the expression of two inflammatory factors: Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM‑1) and tumor necrosis factor‑α (TNF‑α). Glucose concentration was additionally calculated. A leukostasis assay was utilized to compare microvasculature pathological alterations. It was demonstrated that retinal glucose concentration of diabetic control and forskolin treatment were both increased compared with normal control, however the forskolin treatment group was only ~68.06% of the diabetic control due to downregulated glucose transporter 1 expression. The expression of ICAM‑1 and TNF‑α were upregulated in the forskolin treatment and diabetic control groups compared with the normal control, however these two inflammatory factor expression levels in the forskolin treatment group were ~68.75 and 75.37% of diabetic control. It was additionally observed that there were less adherent leukocytes in retinal microvasculature in the forskolin treatment group compared with diabetic control. All the differences observed were significant. Overall, by means of limiting glucose transport into the retina via forskolin, the retinal environment with lower glucose concentration alleviates the inflammatory response under diabetic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29207063      PMCID: PMC5783468          DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.8106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


Introduction

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major blinding eye disease and often causes vision loss or even blindness due to macular oedema, retinal detachment and vitreous haemorrhage. It has been predicted that the number of patients with diabetes would increase to 642 million in 2040 (1). Studies showed that under a high glucose environment, excessive oxidative stress products in the retina (2), activation of the renin-angiotensin system (3), and an increase in advanced glycation end products (4) initiated damage in retinal tissue cells, thus causing a series of subsequent pathological changes. Inflammation is an important process in the microangiopathy of DR and many inflammatory mediators are activated in the pathogenesis (5). Previous studies have reported that inflammation could induce retinal biochemical and molecular changes, leading to vision-threaten complications such as diabetic macular edema (DME) (6). Corticosteroids was effective in the treatment of DME proved that inflammation response plays a vital role in DR (7). However the present study merely focused on the upstream of inflammation in DR, hyperglycemia. Glucose in the retina is transported from blood circulation. Glucose uptake by retinal tissue cells depends on one type of glucose-transporting carrier protein family, glucose transporters (GLUTs). GLUT1 is an important member of the GLUT family and is the only transporter that allows glucose to pass through the blood-retinal barrier (8). Forskolin is a type of diterpenoid derivative extracted from Coleus forskohlii. Forskolin can inhibit the glucose transport by GLUT1 (9). Our group aimed to use forskolin to inhibit the GLUT1 transport of glucose into the retina and thus reduce the glucose level in retinal tissues; consequently, we could determine whether inhibition of GLUT1 could control the glucose level in retinal tissues and alleviate inflammation response of DR.

Materials and methods

Reagents and instruments

Streptozotocin (STZ), forskolin, and the glucose content detection reagent kit were all from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, St. Louis, MO, USA). The protein quantitation reagent kit was from Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (Hercules, CA, USA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated concanavalin A (FITC-ConA) was from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA, USA). Rabbit anti-mouse GLUT-1, intracellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) primary antibodies and goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody were all from Millipore Corporation (St. Charles, MO, USA). Citric acid buffer was from Tiangen Biotech (Beijing, China). The electronic analytic balance was from Jingke Balance Factory (Shanghai, China). The spectrophotometer was from Spectro (Kleve, Germany). The inverted fluorescence microscope was from Olympus Corporation (Tokyo, Japan).

Experimental animals and grouping

This study was complied with the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines and carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publications no. 8023, revised 1978). The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Nanchang University. A total of 27 healthy, inbred, 8-week-old, male, and clean-grade C57BL/6 mice without eye diseases and with a body weight of 20–30 g were purchased from the Department of Animal Sciences of Nanchang University. The mice were numbered using ear tags and randomly divided into a normal control group, diabetic control group, and forskolin treatment group. Each group had 9 animals. For establishment of the DM model, mice were fasted for 8 h and then received an intraperitoneal injection of STZ for 5 consecutive days. Before injection, STZ was dissolved in pH 4.5, 0.01 M citric acid buffer. The diabetic control group and the forskolin treatment group received STZ at a dose of 55 mg•kg−1 (10), and the normal control group received an intraperitoneal injection of an equal amount of citric acid buffer. Tail vein blood samples were collected on day 7 to measure blood glucose. The model was successfully established when the blood glucose level was greater than 300 mg•dl−1. After model establishment, the forskolin treatment group received intragastric administration of forskolin at 50 mg•kg−1 week−1 for 12 consecutive weeks, and the normal control group and the diabetic control group received an equal amount of PBS.

Detection of glucose levels in retinal tissues

Six mice from each of the 3 groups were sacrificed by spinal dislocation, and 6 left eyeballs were removed to measure the glucose levels in the retina. The right eyeballs were used for subsequent western blot analysis. Retinal tissues were collected, added to 50 µl deionized water, and heated to 70–75°C for 15 min. The samples were then sonicated for 30 sec and centrifuged for 20 min. A total of 35 µl supernatant was added to 165 µl glucose concentration assay reagent, and the standard curve and the blank control were set up. The absorbance of the samples was measured using a spectrophotometer, and the glucose concentration was calculated using SPECTROstar Nano MARS software. Next, 10 µl supernatant was added to 190 µl protein concentration determination reagent, and the standard curve and a blank control were set up. The absorbance of the samples was measured using a spectrophotometer, and the protein concentration was calculated using SPECTROstar Nano MARS software. The retinal glucose level was expressed as nmol glucose•mg protein−1, and the calculation formula was GxGV•GMW−1•(PxPV)−1, with the following parameters: G, glucose concentration (ng•ml−1); GV, volume of glucose content determination reaction solution (ml); P, protein concentration (mg•ml−1); PV, volume of protein concentration determination reaction solution (ml); and GMW, molecular weight of glucose (180.2).

Western blot analysis

The retinal tissues of the above 6 removed right eyeballs of the mice in the 3 groups were collected and placed in Eppendorf tubes with 200 µl lysis buffer. Samples were sonicated for 30 sec and centrifuged for 20 min. The supernatant was collected, and the protein concentrations of the samples were determined. Equal amounts of protein samples were collected and subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred onto a membrane for 90–120 min. The membrane was incubated with the GLUT-1, ICAM-1 and TNF-α primary antibodies at 75°C overnight. The next day, the membrane was washed 3 times and incubated with the secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. The developing solution was then added in a dark room for gel image analysis; in addition, the grey scale values of the protein bands were measured.

Leukostasis assay in retinal blood vessels

Three mice from each of the 3 groups were anaesthetized using a mixed solution of ketamine (10 mg•kg−1) and xylazine (60 mg•kg−1). The thoracic skin and ribs of the mice were cut to expose the thoracic cavity. The descending aorta was closed by clamping, the right atrial appendage was cut, and a 27 G needle was inserted into the left ventricle. A mixture of 10 ml PBS and heparin (0.1 mg•ml−1) was first perfused to wash out non-adherent leukocytes. Next, adherent leukocytes were labelled with a mixed solution containing 20 µg•ml−1 PBS and FITC-ConA (5 mg•kg−1). FITC-ConA that did not bind to leukocytes was washed out using 10 ml PBS. After the mice were sacrificed, 6 eyeballs were removed from each group and directly placed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h. Next, the retinal tissues were flat mounted and counted under a fluorescence microscope.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software. The body weight, glucose levels, retinal glucose levels, and grey scale density results of western blot were expressed as mean ± SD. A comparison between groups was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with post hoc contrasts by Student-Newman-Keuls test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Establishment of the diabetic model and measurement of body weight and blood glucose levels in the three groups

All blood glucose levels of the 27 males C57BL/6 mice (diabetic control and forskolin treatment groups) used for diabetes induction were higher than 300 mg/dl at 7 day after streptozotocin intraperitoneal injection. We measured the body weight and blood glucose levels of the mice at 21 weeks after diabetes induction. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the body weight of the mice among the three groups when the diabetes was successfully induced. At 21 weeks after diabetes induction, the body weight of the normal control group was significantly higher than that of the diabetic control and forskolin treatment groups by 43.18 and 37.90%, respectively. We also measured the blood glucose levels at 1 day and 21 weeks after the diabetes induction. The blood glucose levels of the normal control group were lower than those of the diabetic control group by 48.04 and 55.21%, respectively. The blood glucose levels were significantly lower than those of the forskolin treatment group by 48.75 and 46.64% (P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference between the diabetic control and forskolin treatment groups (Table I).
Table I.

Body weight and blood glucose levels of the three groups.

Body weight (g)Blood glucose level (mg/dl)


GroupAt 1 day after the diabetes inductionAt 21 weeks after the diabetes inductionAt 1 day after the diabetes inductionAt 21 weeks after the diabetes induction
Normal control26.32±2.2536.31±2.98178.41±19.58169.53±26.25
Diabetic control25.83±2.0025.36±3.02[a]343.36±61.52378.51±51.25[a]
Forskolin treatment26.12±1.9826.33±3.16[a]348.15±63.53363.52±60.14[a]

P<0.01 vs. normal control n=9, mean ± SD.

Determination of glucose levels in retinal tissues

The retinal glucose levels in the 3 groups were measured. The glucose level in the mouse retina in the normal control group was (38.21±2.31 nmol) glucose•mg protein−1. At week 21, the retinal glucose level of the mice in the diabetic control group reached (152.13±7.31) nmol glucose•mg protein−1, and the retinal glucose level of the mice in the forskolin treatment group was (103.54±6.27) nmol glucose•mg protein−1. The retinal glucose levels of the mice in the two groups of diabetic models were both higher than that in the normal control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). In addition, the retinal glucose level of the mice in the forskolin treatment group was significantly lower (P<0.01) than that in the diabetic control group and was approximately 68.06% of that in the diabetic control group (Fig. 1A).
Figure 1.

Retinal glucose concentration and GLUT1 expression of three groups mice. (A) Retinal glucose concentration of three groups mice; (B) GLUT1 expression in the retina of three groups. Data are representative of three independent experiments and values are expressed in mean ± SD. **P<0.01 vs. normal control; ΔΔP<0.01 vs. diabetic control. n=6.

Retinal GLUT1 expression in the three groups

The expression of GLUT1 in the retina was upregulated under diabetic conditions, but the expression of retinal GLUT1 in the forskolin treatment group was lower than that in the normal control group by 72.13%; however, GLUT1 expression in the forskolin treatment group was lower than that in the diabetic control group by 8.07%. Both of these differences were statistically significant (P<0.01) (Fig. 1B).

Expression of inflammatory factors in the retina of the mice in the diabetic control group and the forskolin control group

Previous studies confirmed that DR is a chronic inflammatory disease (11). ICAM-1 and TNF-α are two important markers of inflammatory reactions. The expression of ICAM-1 and TNF-α in the retina of the mice in the three groups was determined using western blot, and the results were statistically analysed. The results showed that the ICAM-1 expression was upregulated in both the diabetic control group and the forskolin treatment group compared to that in the normal control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). In addition, the ICAM-1 expression in the retina of the mice in the forskolin treatment group was approximately 68.75% of that in the diabetic control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.

(A) Inflammation factor ICAM-1 expression in retina of three groups mice. (B) Data are representative of three independent experiments and values are expressed in maen ± SD. **P<0.01 vs. normal control; ΔP<0.05 vs. diabetic control, n=6. mean ± SD.

The TNF-α results were similar. The expression of TNF-α in the diabetic control group and the forskolin treatment group was also upregulated compared to that in the normal control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.01). In addition, the TNF-α expression in the retina of the mice in the forskolin treatment group was ~75.37% of that in the diabetic control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

(A) Inflammation factor TNF-α expression in retina of three groups mice. (B) Data are representative of three independent experiments and values are expressed in mean ± SD. **P<0.01 vs. normal control; ΔP<0.05 vs. diabetic control. n=6, mean ± SD.

Leukostasis changes in retinal blood vessels in the diabetic control group and the forskolin treatment group

Leukostasis in retinal blood vessels is an important indicator of retinal inflammation (12) and is also an early pathological change in DR. Our results showed that there were only several isolated adherent leukocytes in the retinal blood vessels in the normal control group. The mice in the diabetic group and the forskolin treatment groups both had more leukostasis; however, the number of counted adherent leukocytes in the forskolin treatment group was approximately 48.28% of that in the diabetic control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01) (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.

Retinal leukostasis assay of three groups mice. (A) Normal control group; (B) Diabetic control group; (C) forskolin treatment group; and (D) statistical analysis of adherent leukocytes quantification. Data are representative of three independent experiments and values are expressed in mean ± SD. **P<0.01 vs. normal control; ΔΔP<0.01 vs. diabetic control, n=6, mean ± SD. Fluorescence microscope, original magnification, ×400. White arrows indicate for leukocytes adhere to retinal vasculatures.

Discussion

DR is one of the most common severe complications of DM and will become an extensive public health issue in the future. The specific pathogenic mechanism is still not clear. A large-scale, randomized, clinical study, the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) (13), previously confirmed the important roles of high blood glucose in DR and other diabetic complications. The mechanisms of high glucose on retinal cells may include influences on the expression of specific genes, an increase in advanced glycation end products, and an increase in the oxidative stress reaction (14). We hypothesized that since the high glucose microenvironment of retinal tissues in the diabetic condition exerts damaging effects, controlling the local glucose level in retinal tissues and reversing the high glucose environment may alleviate inflammation response. Glucose in the retina is transported from blood, however, water-soluble glucose cannot pass through the phospholipid bilayer of the cell membrane and requires a group of carrier proteins, GLUTs, for glucose transport. GLUT1 is the only carrier that allows glucose to pass through the blood-retinal barrier (8). Kumagai et al used immunocytochemistry to quantitatively study GLUT1 expression in eyeballs (without or with only mild retinopathy) of DM patients and showed that the GLUT1 activity in the retina of more than half of the eyeballs was 18 times higher than that in the normal control group, suggesting that GLUT1 upregulation mediated cell injury through its transport of a large amount of glucose into the retina (15). Forskolin could competitively inhibit glucose transport by GLUT1, thus reducing retinal glucose levels. As mentioned above, the expression of retinal GLUT1 of the forskolin treatment was decreased by ~95.04% compared with that in the diabetic control group and by ~72.13% compared with that in the normal control group. At 21 weeks after the establishment of the DM model, the retinal glucose level of the mice in the forskolin treatment group was only 68.06% of that in the diabetic control group, confirming that forskolin could effectively limit glucose transport into the retina via GLUT1 inhibition. Inflammation is an important step in the pathological changes of DR. We measured two markers of the inflammatory reaction, the level of the ICAM-1 chemokine and the level of the TNF-α cytokine. ICAM-1 plays important roles in mediating leukostasis (16). Inhibition of ICAM-1 can significantly reduce leukostasis and vascular permeability (17). TNF-α expression is also upregulated in the retina of DR patients (18). We found that the expression levels of ICAM-1 and TNF-α in the retina of the mice in the forskolin treatment group were only 68.75 and 75.37%, respectively, of those in the diabetic control group. These results suggested that after glucose transport into the retina was inhibited by forskolin, the inflammatory reaction in diabetic mice was relatively mild. Studies showed that the number of leukocytes in the retina of diabetic animal models increased, the adhesion ability increased, and the deformability decreased (19,20). The passive deformability of leukocytes to pass through capillaries that had smaller diameters in DR patients, thus causing an increase in the leukocyte adhesion rate. In addition, with the progression of the disease, the increase in the adhesion rate was more evident (14). A leukostasis assay in retinal blood vessels could be used to analyse and compare the extent of inflammatory reactions in DR. This study showed that although the forskolin treatment had a higher number of adherent leukocytes in retinal blood vessels than the normal control group, the number was only 48.28% of that in the diabetic control group. In conclusion, inhibition of GLUT1 by forskolin could decrease the retinal glucose level in diabetic mice to form a relatively low glucose environment in the retina. Under this environment, retinal inflammation response was relieved compared to that in general diabetic mice. These results suggested that inhibition of GLUT1 to limit local retinal glucose levels may become a new direction for future therapy of DR.
  18 in total

1.  Silybin reduces obliterated retinal capillaries in experimental diabetic retinopathy in rats.

Authors:  Hong-Tao Zhang; Kai Shi; Attit Baskota; Fang-Li Zhou; Ya-Xi Chen; Hao-Ming Tian
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 2.  Fenofibrate - a potential systemic treatment for diabetic retinopathy?

Authors:  Tien Yin Wong; Rafael Simó; Paul Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Suppression of GLUT1; a new strategy to prevent diabetic complications.

Authors:  Lili Lu; Christopher P Seidel; Takeshi Iwase; Rebecca K Stevens; Yuan-Yuan Gong; Xinyi Wang; Sean F Hackett; Peter A Campochiaro
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Müller Glia Are a Major Cellular Source of Survival Signals for Retinal Neurons in Diabetes.

Authors:  Shuhua Fu; Shuqian Dong; Meili Zhu; David M Sherry; Changyun Wang; Zhipeng You; Jody J Haigh; Yun-Zheng Le
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 5.  Glucose transporters in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Bernard Thorens; Mike Mueckler
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Müller cell-derived VEGF is essential for diabetes-induced retinal inflammation and vascular leakage.

Authors:  Juanjuan Wang; Xueliang Xu; Michael H Elliott; Meili Zhu; Yun-Zheng Le
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  Retinopathy in a novel model of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: new insight on the inflammatory paradigm.

Authors:  Kousuke Noda; Shintaro Nakao; Souska Zandi; Dawei Sun; K C Hayes; Ali Hafezi-Moghadam
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pathological upregulation of inner blood-retinal barrier Glut1 glucose transporter expression in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A K Kumagai; S A Vinores; W M Pardridge
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Role of steroids in the management of diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Paolo S Silva; Jennifer K Sun; Lloyd Paul Aiello
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.975

10.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reduction of Glut1 in the Neural Retina But Not the RPE Alleviates Polyol Accumulation and Normalizes Early Characteristics of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Authors:  Nicholas C Holoman; Jacob J Aiello; Timothy D Trobenter; Matthew J Tarchick; Michael R Kozlowski; Emily R Makowski; Darryl C De Vivo; Charandeep Singh; Jonathan E Sears; Ivy S Samuels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The innate immune system in diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Warren W Pan; Feng Lin; Patrice E Fort
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 19.704

3.  Isoforskolin and forskolin attenuate lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation through TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB cascades in human mononuclear leukocytes.

Authors:  Xiaohua Du; Rui Shi; Youlan Wang; Wenjuang Wu; Shibo Sun; Zelan Dai; Chen Chen; Zhiying Weng; Xian Li; Qian Liu; Liyan Zhang; Mayer Saidian; Weimin Yang
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.878

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.