| Literature DB >> 29206877 |
A Rogan, K McCarthy, G McGregor, T Hamborg, G Evans, S Hewins, N Aldridge, S Fletcher, N Krishnan, R Higgins, D Zehnder, S M Ting.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183926.].Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29206877 PMCID: PMC5716600 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 2A depicts the unadjusted regression of the PCS on VO2peak in the CKD and HTN cohorts. Unadjusted regression of Physical Component Score on VO2peak in the CKD and HTN cohort. b, unstandardized regression coefficient: change in PCS per one unit change of variable. *p–value<0.05. Dash line = HTN, straight line = CKD. B demonstrates the same regression after adjustment for age, sex and BMI. Lack of difference of changes in VO2peak with Physical Component Score between the CKD and HTN cohorts. ΔB is the difference in the parameter estimates between the regression lines for the HTN and CKD groups. Group interaction with VO2peak was adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. Dash line = HTN, straight line = CKD.