Literature DB >> 29206792

Direct Anterior Hip Replacement Does Not Pose Undue Radiation Exposure Risk to the Patient or Surgeon.

David Clinton McNabb1,2, Jason M Jennings2, Daniel L Levy2, Todd M Miner2, Charlie C Yang2, Raymond H Kim3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The fluoroscopically assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has gained interest in recent years. One of the perceived advantages is the use of fluoroscopy to aid in the positioning of implants. The purpose of this study was to measure the radiation entrance surface dose to anatomically important areas of both patients and surgeons during direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: Radiation dosimetry badges were placed at the sternal notch and pubic symphysis of 50 patients undergoing direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty. Badges were also placed on the surgeons outside of their lead aprons at the level of the thyroid. Three fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons were involved in the study. Radiation exposure of each badge was measured after each case (surgeon and patient). The cumulative dose was also calculated for the surgeons. To limit surgeon bias during the study, 50 consecutive direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasties that occurred prior to this study were analyzed for total fluoroscopic dose and time and served as a control group.
RESULTS: Forty-five subjects met study criteria. In the study group, 1 patient had a detectable thyroid exposure equal to 1 mrem. Seven patients had a detectable radiation entrance surface dose at the pubic symphysis (range, 1 to 7 mrem). No radiation entrance surface dose was detectable in the remaining 44 patients at the sternal notch and 38 patients at the pubic symphysis. Surgeons in the study did not experience a detectable radiation entrance surface dose. The mean fluoroscopic time was 13.72 seconds (range, 6.7 to 28.7 seconds). The mean patient radiation exposure was 178 mrem (range, 54 to 526 mrem).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that during direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty, the mean patient entrance surface dose at the pubic symphysis and the sternal notch is not detectable in most patients. The mean patient exposure in this study during direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty was 178 mrem, which is less than a single pelvic radiograph (600 mrem). No surgeon in our study demonstrated a detectable radiation entrance surface dose. Our data suggest that direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty typically results in a negligible or very low dose of absorbed radiation exposure to the patient and the surgeon. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We believe this study to have clinical relevance because both patients and surgeons have evidence that utilization of fluoroscopy during direct anterior total hip replacement places both parties at a relatively low radiation exposure risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29206792     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  Effect of Painless Rehabilitation Nursing for Hip Replacement Patients.

Authors:  Xiaona Zhao; Ru Bai; Jing Yang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  A comparison of radiographic leg-length and offset discrepancies between 2 intraoperative measurement techniques in anterior total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel C Austin; Brendan E Dempsey; Samuel T Kunkel; Michael T Torchia; David S Jevsevar
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-10-22

3.  [Application of preoperative digital-template planning in total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach].

Authors:  Zheng Cao; Wei Yang; Minzhi Yang; Xiangpeng Kong; Yi Wang; Renwen Guo; Jiying Chen; Wei Chai
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-11-15

4.  Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?

Authors:  Yuta Jinnai; Tomonori Baba; Xu Zhuang; Hiroki Tanabe; Sammy Banno; Taiji Watari; Yasuhiro Homma; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2020-02-18

5.  Does the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy improve postoperative radiographic component positioning and implant size in total hip arthroplasty utilizing a direct anterior approach?

Authors:  David C Holst; Daniel L Levy; Marc R Angerame; Charlie C Yang
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-12-28

6.  What factors affect fluoroscopy use during Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia?

Authors:  James D Wylie; Michael P McClincy; Evan K Stieler; Michael B Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Christopher L Peters; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2019-09-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.