Literature DB >> 29205834

Validation of Alcohol Flushing Questionnaires in Determining Inactive Aldehyde Dehydrogenase-2 and Its Clinical Implication in Alcohol-Related Diseases.

Cheol Min Shin1, Nayoung Kim1,2, Sung-Il Cho3, Joohon Sung3, Hee-Jung Lee4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to validate alcohol flushing questionnaires in detecting inactive ALDH2 (ALDH2*1/*2 or ALDH2*2/*2).
METHODS: Two study sets were established; in study set 1, 210 healthy male subjects (age 22 to 59 years) were enrolled; in study set 2, 756 subjects were enrolled who received esophagogastroduodenoscopy to evaluate their dyspeptic symptoms or as part of a gastric cancer screening program. Subjects in study sets 1 and 2 completed the modified alcohol flushing questionnaires of Yokoyama and colleagues (, ). Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method was used to determine ALDH2 genotype.
RESULTS: In study set 1, 29.0% (61 of 210) had inactive ALDH2. The sensitivity and specificity of the modified alcohol flushing questionnaire for detecting inactive ALDH2 were 95.1 and 76.5%, respectively. Drinking problems negatively correlated with positive alcohol flushing response and inactive ALDH2 (all p-values < 0.05). In study set 2, the sensitivity and specificity of the alcohol flushing questionnaire for detecting inactive ALDH2 were 78.9 and 82.1%, respectively. Interestingly, drinking ≥7 units/wk in men or ≥3.5 units/wk in women significantly increased the risk of benign gastric ulcer (BGU) among positive alcohol flushers (odds ratio, 8.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 58.30), but not among negative alcohol flushers.
CONCLUSIONS: Simple flushing questionnaires may be administered to the Korean population as a screening tool in detecting individuals who carry inactive ALDH2. Alcohol flushing response negatively correlates with drinking problems and can modify the risk for BGU by alcohol intake.
Copyright © 2017 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALDH2 ; Alcohol; Alcohol Flushing; Questionnaire; Reliability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29205834     DOI: 10.1111/acer.13569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  3 in total

1.  The alcohol flushing response is associated with the risk of depression.

Authors:  Seonghee Jeon; Heewon Kang; Inhyung Cho; Sung-Il Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Primary Reason for Drinking Among Current, Former, and Never Flushing College Students.

Authors:  Sarah Soyeon Oh; Yeong Jun Ju; San Lee; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 3.  Aldehyde Dehydrogenase, Liver Disease and Cancer.

Authors:  Wenjun Wang; Chunguang Wang; Hongxin Xu; Yanhang Gao
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 6.580

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.