Literature DB >> 29205645

Using ricelands to provide temporary shorebird habitat during migration.

Gregory H Golet1, Candace Low2, Simon Avery1, Katie Andrews3, Christopher J McColl4, Rheyna Laney5, Mark D Reynolds3.   

Abstract

To help mitigate large wetland losses in California, The Nature Conservancy launched a dynamic conservation incentive program to create temporary wetland habitats in harvested and fallow rice fields for shorebirds migrating along the Pacific Flyway. Farmers were invited to participate in a reverse auction bidding process and winning bids were selected based on their cost and potential to provide high quality shorebird habitat. This was done in 2014 and 2015, for separate enrollment periods that overlapped with spring and fall migration, both before and after the traditional post-harvest flooding period. To assess the success of the program, we monitored shorebird use of fields that were enrolled (treatments), and others that were subject to typical rice farm management (controls). To put these observations in context, we used satellites to simultaneously monitor the extent of shallow-water habitat across the ~215,000 ha of ricelands in the area. Results showed that providing habitat during migration, when it is typically unavailable in rice fields, yielded the largest average shorebird densities ever reported for agriculture in the region. Treatment fields had significantly greater shorebird density, richness and diversity than control fields in both spring and fall (especially September-early October, and late March-early April), but in fall the difference was greater. Shorebird responses to habitat provisioning, and regional habitat conditions, were variable from year to year, and highly dynamic within a given season. Overall, shorebirds densities were found to be negatively related to the total amount of flooded habitat in the rice landscape. Factors that affected habitat availability included allocation schedules of water deliveries from reservoirs, and rainfall patterns, both of which were influenced by drought. Collectively, these results suggest that appropriately managed agricultural lands have great potential to provide high value habitat for shorebirds during times of habitat deficit, including migration, and that fall may be a particularly impactful time to create additional habitat. Migratory species face great challenges due to the climate change, conversion of historical stopover sites, and other factors, but dynamic conservation programs offer promise that, at least in certain instances, their needs can still be met.
© 2017 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BirdReturns; bootstrapping; dynamic conservation; farmland; flooding; habitat deficit; landowner incentive; migration; payment for services; reverse auction; rice; waterbirds

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29205645     DOI: 10.1002/eap.1658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  6 in total

1.  Quantifying shorebird habitat in managed wetlands by modeling shallow water depth dynamics.

Authors:  Danica Schaffer-Smith; Jennifer J Swenson; Matthew E Reiter; Jennifer E Isola
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Both real-time and long-term environmental data perform well in predicting shorebird distributions in managed habitat.

Authors:  Erin E Conlisk; Gregory H Golet; Mark D Reynolds; Blake A Barbaree; Kristin A Sesser; Kristin B Byrd; Sam Veloz; Matthew E Reiter
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 6.105

3.  Impact of rice paddy agriculture on habitat usage of migratory shorebirds at the rice paddy scale in Korea.

Authors:  Seung-Hye Choi; Green Choi; Hyung-Kyu Nam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Waterbird response to variable-timing of drawdown in rice fields after winter-flooding.

Authors:  Kristin A Sesser; Monica Iglecia; Matthew E Reiter; Khara M Strum; Catherine M Hickey; Rodd Kelsey; Daniel A Skalos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of drought on the abundance and distribution of non-breeding shorebirds in central California, USA.

Authors:  Blake A Barbaree; Matthew E Reiter; Catherine M Hickey; Khara M Strum; Jennifer E Isola; Scott Jennings; L Max Tarjan; Cheryl M Strong; Lynne E Stenzel; W David Shuford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of extreme drought and incentive programs on flooded agriculture and wetlands in California's Central Valley.

Authors:  Matthew E Reiter; Nathan K Elliott; Dennis Jongsomjit; Gregory H Golet; Mark D Reynolds
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.