BACKGROUND: Caries decline in the western world is accompanied by strong polarization among children; 8% of Finnish 5-year-olds having 76% of untreated caries. This high caries risk group needs preventive and restorative strategies. AIM: To explore survival of extensive restorations in primary molars. DESIGN: This study was based on health records from 2002 to 2016 of children under 18 years. RESULTS: Of severely affected primary molars (n = 1061), 41% were restored with preformed metal crowns (PMCs), 38% with glass-ionomer cement (GIC)/polyacid-modified resin composite (PAMRC)/resin-modified GIC (RMGIC), and 21% with resin composites (RC). Younger children (3-8) received 97% of the PMCs and 86% of GIC/PAMRC/RMGIC; older ones (≥9) 91% of the RC restorations. Neither amalgam nor indirect restorations were registered. General dentists (GDs) engaged in primary care restored with GIC/PAMRC/RMGIC (52%) or RC (48%). GDs in general anesthesia care service placed 66% and specializing/specialized dentists 31% of PMCs. PMCs had lower failure rate (1.4% vs 3.0%) than GIC/PAMRC/RMGIC (P = 0.001). Choosing PMCs reduced patient visits compared to other restorations (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severely affected primary molars of children at high caries risk are better managed, using PMCs to optimize the resources in public oral health services.
BACKGROUND: Caries decline in the western world is accompanied by strong polarization among children; 8% of Finnish 5-year-olds having 76% of untreated caries. This high caries risk group needs preventive and restorative strategies. AIM: To explore survival of extensive restorations in primary molars. DESIGN: This study was based on health records from 2002 to 2016 of children under 18 years. RESULTS: Of severely affected primary molars (n = 1061), 41% were restored with preformed metal crowns (PMCs), 38% with glass-ionomer cement (GIC)/polyacid-modified resin composite (PAMRC)/resin-modified GIC (RMGIC), and 21% with resin composites (RC). Younger children (3-8) received 97% of the PMCs and 86% of GIC/PAMRC/RMGIC; older ones (≥9) 91% of the RC restorations. Neither amalgam nor indirect restorations were registered. General dentists (GDs) engaged in primary care restored with GIC/PAMRC/RMGIC (52%) or RC (48%). GDs in general anesthesia care service placed 66% and specializing/specialized dentists 31% of PMCs. PMCs had lower failure rate (1.4% vs 3.0%) than GIC/PAMRC/RMGIC (P = 0.001). Choosing PMCs reduced patient visits compared to other restorations (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severely affected primary molars of children at high caries risk are better managed, using PMCs to optimize the resources in public oral health services.
Authors: Małgorzata Staszczyk; Anna Jurczak; Marcin Magacz; Dorota Kościelniak; Iwona Gregorczyk-Maga; Małgorzata Jamka-Kasprzyk; Magdalena Kępisty; Iwona Kołodziej; Magdalena Kukurba-Setkowicz; Wirginia Krzyściak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 3.390