Literature DB >> 29205508

Aberrant methylation of mutL homolog 1 is associated with increased risk of non-small cell lung cancer.

Haochang Hu1, Xiaoying Chen2, Cong Zhou1, Bin Li1, Yong Yang1, Xiuru Ying1, Yiyi Mao1, Yihan Zhang1, Jie Zhong1, Jie Dai1, Hang Yu1, Boyi Wu1, Xiaodong Li1, Tiangong Wang1, Shiwei Duan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common malignant tumor. DNA hypermethylation in the promoter region has been served as a potential molecular marker for several tumors. The goal of the current study was to assess the diagnostic ability of mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) promoter methylation in NSCLC.
METHODS: A total of 111 NSCLC patients' paired tissue samples were obtained to explore the association between MLH1 promoter methylation and NSCLC by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) method. Public databases including The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were used to verify our findings.
RESULTS: Our results showed a significantly higher MLH1 methylation frequency in tumor tissue samples than their paired adjacent tissues (P = .008). ROC curve indicated that MLH1MSP assay was a sensitive but not a specific method in the diagnosis for NSCLC (sensitivity = 0.964, specificity = 0.135, AUC = 0.550). And the association between the methylation level and clinical characteristics has no statistical significance. TCGA cohort evinced a higher methylation probability in tumor group compared with nontumor group (the mean β value: -0.449 [-0.467, -0.437] vs -0.466 [-0.472, -0.437], P = .011), which was consistent with our results. Meanwhile, an inverse correlation between MLH1 methylation and MLH1 expression was detected in TCGA and GEO databases.
CONCLUSIONS: The MSP method for MLH1 methylation was a sensitive but not a specific diagnostic method for NSCLC.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; diagnosis; methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction; mutL homolog 1; non-small cell lung cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29205508      PMCID: PMC6816959          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  44 in total

Review 1.  DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  Thomas A Kunkel; Dorothy A Erie
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  DNA repair and cell cycle control genes and the risk of young-onset lung cancer.

Authors:  Stefano Landi; Federica Gemignani; Federico Canzian; Valérie Gaborieau; Roberto Barale; Debora Landi; Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska; David Zaridze; Jolanta Lissowska; Peter Rudnai; Eleonora Fabianova; Dana Mates; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; Vladimir Bencko; Lydie Gioia-Patricola; Janet Hall; Paolo Boffetta; Rayjean J Hung; Paul Brennan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Discovery and development of DNA methylation-based biomarkers for lung cancer.

Authors:  Kimberly Walter; Thomas Holcomb; Tom Januario; Robert L Yauch; Pan Du; Richard Bourgon; Somasekar Seshagiri; Lukas C Amler; Garret M Hampton; David S Shames
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.778

4.  Cancer risks for MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  James G Dowty; Aung K Win; Daniel D Buchanan; Noralane M Lindor; Finlay A Macrae; Mark Clendenning; Yoland C Antill; Stephen N Thibodeau; Graham Casey; Steve Gallinger; Loic Le Marchand; Polly A Newcomb; Robert W Haile; Graeme P Young; Paul A James; Graham G Giles; Shanaka R Gunawardena; Barbara A Leggett; Michael Gattas; Alex Boussioutas; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Susan Parry; Jack Goldblatt; Joanne P Young; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 5.  Lung cancer epidemiology: contemporary and future challenges worldwide.

Authors:  Joanna Didkowska; Urszula Wojciechowska; Marta Mańczuk; Jakub Łobaszewski
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

6.  Promoter hypermethylation of DNA repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 in adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the lung.

Authors:  A Gomes; M Reis-Silva; A Alarcão; P Couceiro; V Sousa; L Carvalho
Journal:  Rev Port Pneumol       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 7.  The role of DNA methylation as biomarkers in the clinical management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Michael Fleischhacker; Dimo Dietrich; Volker Liebenberg; John K Field; Bernd Schmidt
Journal:  Expert Rev Respir Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Predictive value of CHFR and MLH1 methylation in human gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yazhuo Li; Yunsheng Yang; Youyong Lu; James G Herman; Malcolm V Brock; Po Zhao; Mingzhou Guo
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  The diagnostic role of plasma circulating precursors of miRNA-944 and miRNA-3662 for non-small cell lung cancer detection.

Authors:  Tomasz Powrózek; Barbara Kuźnar-Kamińska; Marcin Dziedzic; Radosław Mlak; Halina Batura-Gabryel; Dariusz Sagan; Paweł Krawczyk; Janusz Milanowski; Teresa Małecka-Massalska
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Folic-acid metabolism and DNA-repair phenotypes differ between neuroendocrine lung tumors and associate with aggressive subtypes, therapy resistance and outcome.

Authors:  Robert Fred Henry Walter; Fabian Dominik Mairinger; Robert Werner; Claudia Vollbrecht; Thomas Hager; Kurt Werner Schmid; Jeremias Wohlschlaeger; Daniel Christian Christoph
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis approach on diagnostic value of MLH1 promoter methylation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Qun Li; Jinjiong Hong; Zhisen Shen; Hongxia Deng; Yi Shen; Zhenhua Wu; Chongchang Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Role of DNA Methylation in the Resistance to Therapy in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Susana Romero-Garcia; Heriberto Prado-Garcia; Angeles Carlos-Reyes
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Impact of Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibition on the Proteomic Profile of Lung Adenocarcinoma as Measured by Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis Coupled with Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Ángela Marrugal; Irene Ferrer; Maria Dolores Pastor; Laura Ojeda; Álvaro Quintanal-Villalonga; Amancio Carnero; Sonia Molina-Pinelo; Luis Paz-Ares
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 6.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.