| Literature DB >> 29204573 |
Do-Yeon Cho1,2, Kyle J Hoffman1, Gobind S Gill1, Dong-Jin Lim1, Daniel Skinner1, Calvin Mackey1, Steven M Rowe2,3, Bradford A Woodworth1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Amphotericin B (AMB), a potent antifungal agent, has been employed as topical and systemic therapy for sinonasal fungal infections. A novel formulation of nanodisc (ND) containing super aggregated AMB (ND-AMB) for the treatment of fungal infections has been recently developed to provide greater protection from AMB toxicity than current, clinically approved lipid-based formulations. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the safety and potency of ND-AMB for sinonasal delivery using an in vitro model.Entities:
Keywords: Amphotericin; Chronic rhinosinusitis; Ciliary beat frequency; Drug delivery; Mucociliary clearance; Sinus epithelium; Sinusitis; Transepithelial ion transport
Year: 2017 PMID: 29204573 PMCID: PMC5683641 DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 2095-8811
Fig. 1Reduced trans-epithelial K+ currents after exposure to ND-AMB compared to AMB. A: Representative Ussing chamber tracings reveal K+ currents after exposure to either ND-AMB or AMB. By convention, a positive deflection in the tracing represents movement of a cation (i.e. K+) in the mucosal to serosal direction. Once the AMB (10 μg/ml) was exposed to the apical side, K+ currents increased immediately but negligible induction of K+ current was observed when exposed to ND-AMB. As there was no response to the initial 10 μg/ml of ND-AMB, repeated ND-AMB was given every 5 min (10 μg/ml × 4). B: Results were summarized relative to trans-epithelial K+ current elicited by AMB vs ND-AMB exposure. * Statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2Reduced trans-epithelial resistance (Ω cm2) after exposure to AMB compared to ND-AMB A: Representative Ussing chamber tracings reveal changes of trans-epithelial resistance after exposure to either ND-AMB or AMB. A negative deflection in the tracing represents decrease in trans-epithelial resistance (Ω cm2). With exposing AMB (10 μg/ml) to apical side, trans-epithelial resistance decreased immediately, representing the K+ currents. As there was no response to initial 10 μg/ml of ND-AMB, repeated ND-AMB was given every 5 min (10 μg/ml × 4). Negligible change was noticed after exposing ND-AMB. B: Summary representation of changes (Δ) in trans-epithelial resistance (Ω cm2) (n = 4, per condition). ΔR (changes in trans-epithelial resistance, Ω cm2) following application of AMB was significantly higher than those cells exposed to ND-AMB (P > 0.05).
Fig. 3ND-AMB protected airway epithelial cells from AMB mediated cytotoxicity for those cells incubated with AMB, LDH release was significantly increased compared to cells incubated with ND-AMB at same concentration. Dosage was chosen based on commercially available concentration of AMB. At 75 μg/ml, ND-AMB protected epithelial cells from the cytotoxicity of AMB, as determined by almost 85% reduction in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. At higher concentration (150 μg/ml) of AMB, significantly higher LDH release was noticed compared to LDH release at 75 μg/ml (P = 0.0004). NS – no statistical significance; * Statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4No changes in ciliary beat frequencies (CBF). There was no difference in CBF between the two groups [Control = (1.33 ± 0.04) CBF fold changes, AMB = (1.35 ± 0.44) CBF fold changes, ND-AMB = (1.34 ± 0.44) CBF fold changes, P = 0.96).
Fig. 5Antifungal property of ND-AMB against A. fumigatus At the dose of 10 μg/ml, much smaller expression profiles of A. fumigatus 18S rRNA were observed from ND-AMB (n = 3) compared to AMB (n = 3) (P < 0.0001): ND-AMB was significantly more potent than AMB at lower dose. At higher concentration (the dose of 50 μg/ml), there was no statistical significance in RNA expression profiles between AMB (n = 3) and ND-AMB (n = 3): ND-AMB was as potent as AMB at higher dose (P < 0.0001). NS – no statistical significance; * Statistical significance (P < 0.05).