| Literature DB >> 29204468 |
Mostafa Jalilifar1, Ali Yadollahpour1.
Abstract
The data represented here are in relation with the manuscript "Quantitative assessments of extracellular EEG to classify specific features of main phases of seizure acquisition based on kindling model in Rat" (Jalilifar et al., 2017) [1] which quantitatively classified different main stages of the kindling process based on their electrophysiological characteristics using EEG signal processing. The data in the graphical form reported the contribution of different sub bands of EEG in different stages of kindling- induced epileptogenesis. Only EEG signals related to stages 1-2 (initial seizure stages (ISSs)), 3 (localized seizure stage (LSS)), and 4-5 (generalized seizure stages (GSSs) were transferred into frequency function by Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and their power spectrum and power of each sub bands including delta (1-4 Hz), Theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), beta (12-28 Hz), gamma (28-40 Hz) were calculated with MATLAB 2013b. Accordingly, all results were obtained quantitatively which can contribute to reduce the errors in the behavioral assessments.Entities:
Keywords: Kindling stage; Quantitative assessment; Rat; Spectral power
Year: 2017 PMID: 29204468 PMCID: PMC5709293 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Contribution of different sub bands power in ISSs. We reported the mean value for each rat.
| Rats | Delta | Theta | Alpha | Beta | Gamma | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle ISSs | Rat 1 | 0.64 | 0.29 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Rat 2 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.03 | |
| Rat 3 | 0.52 | 0.26 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.02 | |
| Rat 4 | 0.55 | 0.28 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.02 | |
| Rat 5 | 0.4 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.01 | |
| Rat 6 | 0.73 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.0047 | |
| Rat 7 | 0.46 | 0.31 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.03 | |
| Rat 8 | 0.56 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.01 | |
| Rat 9 | 0.58 | 0.29 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.01 | |
| Rat 10 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.03 |
The percentage of different frequencies in LSSs. We reported the mean value for each rat.
| Rats | Delta | Theta | Alpha | Beta | Gamma | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle LSSs | Rat 1 | 0.4 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.03 |
| Rat 2 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.03 | |
| Rat 3 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.03 | |
| Rat 4 | 0.44 | 0.31 | 0.12 | 0.1 | 0.01 | |
| Rat 5 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.04 | |
| Rat 6 | 0.52 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.02 | |
| Rat 7 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 0.2 | 0.18 | 0.03 | |
| Rat 8 | 0.59 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | |
| Rat 9 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.02 | |
| Rat 10 | 0.57 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.01 |
contribution of different sub bands power in GSSs. We reported the mean value for each rat.
| Rats | Delta | Theta | Alpha | Beta | Gamma | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindle GSSs | Rat 1 | 0.36 | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.03 |
| Rat 2 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.03 | |
| Rat 3 | 0.23 | 0.35 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.02 | |
| Rat 4 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.2 | 0.23 | 0.02 | |
| Rat 5 | 0.5 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.02 | |
| Rat 6 | 0.61 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | |
| Rat 7 | 0.4 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.02 | |
| Rat 8 | 0.56 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |
| Rat 9 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.02 | |
| Rat 10 | 0.59 | 0.27 | 0.69 | 0.06 | 0.01 |
Contribution of different sub bands power in sham group. We reported the mean value for each rat.
| Rats | Delta | Theta | Alpha | Beta | Gamma | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | Rat 1 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.07 |
| Rat 2 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.09 | |
| Rat 3 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.2 | 0.07 | |
| Rat 4 | 0.3 | 0.29 | 0.12 | 0.2 | 0.06 | |
| Rat 5 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.07 | |
| Rat 6 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.07 | |
| Rat 7 | 0.24 | 0.3 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.06 |
Fig. 1Schematic of the stimulation protocol.
| Subject area | Neuroscience |
| More specific subject area | Computational neuroscience |
| Type of data | Table, graph |
| How data was acquired | EEG signal processing using MATLAB 2013b. |
| Data format | Raw, analyzed |
| Experimental factors | Adult male rats ( |
| Experimental features | Computational analysis: EEG signals were analyzed using FFT |
| Data source location | Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz, Iran 31°18′11.5″N 48°44′41.9″E |
| Data accessibility | All of the data presented in this study are accessible within this article |