| Literature DB >> 29204075 |
Mohamed F Alajmi1, Perwez Alam1, Saleh I Alqasoumi1, Nasir Ali Siddiqui1, Omer A Basudan1, Afzal Hussain1, Fohad Mabood Husain2, Azmat Ali Khan3.
Abstract
The standardized ethanol extract (EE) of aerial parts of four Acacia species [A. salicina (ASEE), A. laeta (ALEE), A. hamulosa (AHEE), and A. tortilis (ATEE)] were examined in order to compare their cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities. All the extracts were standardized by UPLC- PDA method using rutin as standard compound. The extracts ALEE, AHEE and ATEE were found to contain rutin along with several other phytoconstituents while rutin was absent in ASEE. All the extracts showed varying level of antimicrobial activity with zone of inhibition ranged from 11 to 21 mm against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans. The ALEE and ATEE showed relatively high antimicrobial potency (MIC = 0.2 to 1.6 mg mL-1) in comparison to other extracts. All the extracts were found to reduce the biofilm of P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain significantly in comparison to the untreated control. The cytotoxic property of ASEE, ALEE, AHEE, ATEE were evaluated against HepG2 (Liver), HEK-293 (Kidney), MCF-7 (Breast) and MDA-MB 231 (Breast) cancer cells. Of these, ALEE, AHEE and ATEE exhibited moderate cytotoxic property against human liver carcinoma cells (HepG2; IC50 = 46.2, 39.2 and 42.3 μg mL-1, respectively) and breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7; IC50 = 57.2, 55.3 and 65.7 μg mL-1, respectively). The ATEE and ALEE showed moderate cytotoxicity against HEK-293 (kidney) cells with IC50 = 49.1 and 53.5 μg mL-1, respectively. Since, Acacia species (A. laeta and A. hamulosa) contains numerous polyphenols which might prove to be highly cytotoxic and antimicrobial agents, we suggest that these species can be further subjected to the isolation of more cytotoxic and antimicrobial compounds.Entities:
Keywords: Acacia; Antimicrobial; Cytotoxicity; Rutin; Standardization
Year: 2017 PMID: 29204075 PMCID: PMC5688228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.09.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Pharm J ISSN: 1319-0164 Impact factor: 4.330
The estimated IC50 (μg mL−1 ± SD) values of ASEE, ALEE, AHEE and ATEE.
| Sample code | HepG2 (Liver) | HEK-293 (Kidney) | MCF-7 (Breast) | MDA-MB-231 (Breast) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASEE | 89.5 ± 3.81 | 75.3 ± 3.65 | 98.3 ± 5.02 | 103.1 ± 5.58 |
| ALEE | 46.2 ± 1.59 | 53.5 ± 2.23 | 57.2 ± 2.61 | 60.3 ± 2.48 |
| AHEE | 39.2 ± 1.52 | 92.1 ± 4.55 | 55.3 ± 2.57 | 59.1 ± 2.70 |
| ATEE | 42.3 ± 1.78 | 49.1 ± 1.92 | 65.7 ± 2.49 | 52.2 ± 1.99 |
| 5-Flurourasil | 3.1 ± 0.07 | 2.5 ± 0.05 | 3.7 ± 0.07 | 3.9 ± 0.09 |
Antimicrobial activity of ASEE, ALEE, AHEE and ATEE.
| S. No | Plant extracts | Zone of inhibition (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | ASEE | 14 ± 0.4 | 19 ± 1.1 | 16 ±1.9 | 14 ± 0.6 |
| 2. | ALEE | 21 ± 0.5 | 16 ± 2.1 | 17 ± 1.7 | 20 ± 0.5 |
| 3. | AHEE | 17 ± 1.8 | 20 ± 1.9 | 20 ± 0.7 | 18 ± 1.3 |
| 4. | ATEE | 17 ± 0.9 | 19 ± 0.8 | 16 ± 1.5 | 15 ± 1.0 |
| 5. | Ampicillin | 21 ± 1.9 | – | – | – |
| 6. | Doxycycline | – | 25 ± 1.2 | 24 ± 1.7 | – |
| 7. | Nystatin | – | – | – | 23 ± 1.1 |
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ASEE, ALEE, AHEE and ATEE against bacterial and fungal strains.
| S. No | Plant extracts | Minimum inhibitory concentration (mg mL−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | ASEE | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 2. | ALEE | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 3. | AHEE | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| 4. | ATEE | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Fig. 1Effect of plant extracts on biofilm formation in pathogenic bacteria at sub-inhibitory concentrations. *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.005; ***p ≤ 0.001.
Fig. 2The chromatogram of rutin showing retention time 4.172 min: (10 μg mL−1) [Conditions: Eclipse XDB 80Å C18 column (4.6 × 100 mm, 3.5 µm); mobile phase, acetonitrile: water (gradient system); flow rate, 0.18 mL min−1; UV-detection of rutin at 332 nm at temperature (25 ± 1 °C)].
Detailed analysis report of rutin in ASEE, ALEE, AHEE and ATEE.
| Name of extract | Theoretical concentration of extracts (μg mL−1) | Concentration of rutin found in extracts (μg mL−1) ± SD | % RSD | Rutin content (%) | Retention time (Rt) (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASEE | 1000.0 | Not available | – | – | – |
| ALEE | 1000.0 | 21.352 ± 0.91 | 4.294 | 2.135 | 4.178 |
| AHEE | 1000.0 | 17.973 ± 0.53 | 2.954 | 1.797 | 4.169 |
| ATEE | 1000.0 | 4.464 ± 0.06 | 1.141 | 0.446 | 4.179 |
Recovery of rutin for the accuracy of the developed method (mean ± SD, n = 3).
| Percentage of rutin added (%) | Theoretical concentrations of rutin (μg mL−1) | Concentrations of rutin found (μg mL−1) ± SD | % RSD | % Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 20.0 | 19.841 ± 0.22 | 1.118 | 99.20 |
| 50.0 | 30.0 | 29.601 ± 0.35 | 1.188 | 98.67 |
| 100.0 | 40.0 | 39.446 ± 0.81 | 2.055 | 98.61 |
| 150.0 | 50.0 | 49.568 ± 1.10 | 2.235 | 99.13 |