Literature DB >> 29203204

Component deficits of visual neglect: "Magnetic" attraction of attention vs. impaired spatial working memory.

Monica N Toba1, Marco Rabuffetti2, Christophe Duret3, Pascale Pradat-Diehl4, Guido Gainotti5, Paolo Bartolomeo6.   

Abstract

Visual neglect is a disabling consequence of right hemisphere damage, whereby patients fail to detect left-sided objects. Its precise mechanisms are debated, but there is some consensus that distinct component deficits may variously associate and interact in different patients. Here we used a touch-screen based procedure to study two putative component deficits of neglect, rightward "magnetic" attraction of attention and impaired spatial working memory, in a group of 47 right brain-damaged patients, of whom 33 had signs of left neglect. Patients performed a visual search task on three distinct conditions, whereby touched targets could (1) be tagged, (2) disappear or (3) show no change. Magnetic attraction of attention was defined as more left neglect on the tag condition than on the disappear condition, where right-sided disappeared targets could not capture patients' attention. Impaired spatial working memory should instead produce more neglect on the no change condition, where no external cue indicated that a target had already been explored, than on the tag condition. Using a specifically developed analysis algorithm, we identified significant differences of performance between the critical conditions. Neglect patients as a group performed better on the disappear condition than on the no change condition and also better in the tag condition comparing with the no change condition. No difference was found between the tag condition and the disappear condition. Some of our neglect patients had dissociated patterns of performance, with predominant magnetic attraction or impaired spatial working memory. Anatomical results issued from both grey matter analysis and fiber tracking were consistent with the typical patterns of fronto-parietal and occipito-frontal disconnection in neglect, but did not identify lesional patterns specifically associated with one or another deficit, thus suggesting the possible co-localization of attentional and working memory processes in fronto-parietal networks. These findings give support to the hypothesis of the co-occurrence of distinct cognitive deficits in visual neglect and stress the necessity of multi-component models of visuospatial disorders.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical anatomical correlations; Magnetic attraction of attention; Neglect; Stroke; Tractography; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29203204     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  8 in total

1.  Pathological structure of visuospatial neglect: A comprehensive multivariate analysis of spatial and non-spatial aspects.

Authors:  Yusaku Takamura; Shintaro Fujii; Satoko Ohmatsu; Shu Morioka; Noritaka Kawashima
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-03-16

2.  Revisiting 'brain modes' in a new computational era: approaches for the characterization of brain-behavioural associations.

Authors:  Monica N Toba; Olivier Godefroy; R Jarrett Rushmore; Melissa Zavaglia; Redwan Maatoug; Claus C Hilgetag; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Right-side spatial neglect and white matter disconnection after left-hemisphere strokes.

Authors:  Monica N Toba; Raffaella Migliaccio; Alexia Potet; Pascale Pradat-Diehl; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Different patterns of confabulation in left visuo-spatial neglect.

Authors:  Gianfranco Dalla Barba; Marta Brazzarola; Claudia Barbera; Sara Marangoni; Francesco Causin; Paolo Bartolomeo; Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual Exploration Area in Neglect: A New Analysis Method for Video-Oculography Data Based on Foveal Vision.

Authors:  Brigitte Charlotte Kaufmann; Samuel Elia Johannes Knobel; Tobias Nef; René Martin Müri; Dario Cazzoli; Thomas Nyffeler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  It is spatial neglect syndrome, not only attention deficit! A child with spinal ependymoma post-resection misdiagnosed as having ADHD: Case report.

Authors:  Saleh Mohammed Alsalhi; Mohammed M J Alqahtani; Ghaniah Alotaibi; Somayyah A AlAdamawi; Razan Ibrahim Arnous
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-15

7.  Computer-based assessment of unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ioanna Giannakou; Dan Lin; David Punt
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Game theoretical mapping of white matter contributions to visuospatial attention in stroke patients with hemineglect.

Authors:  Monica N Toba; Melissa Zavaglia; Caroline Malherbe; Tristan Moreau; Federica Rastelli; Anna Kaglik; Romain Valabrègue; Pascale Pradat-Diehl; Claus C Hilgetag; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.038

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.