Literature DB >> 29203022

Promotion of alternative-sized personal protective equipment.

Michael A Flynn1, Brenna Keller2, Sheli C DeLaney3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With more diversity in the workforce, companies are producing PPE such as hard hats, safety glasses, coveralls, foot protection, and safety harnesses for a larger range of body shapes and sizes. However, gray literature reports suggest that barriers exist to getting alternate sized PPE from the manufacturer to the workers who need it. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which alternative-sized PPE is marketed.
METHOD: A web-based review of seven major manufacturers of PPE was conducted to determine: (a) whether or not they offer alternative-sized products, (b) if these products are clearly labeled, and (c) if images used to display PPE are representative of a diverse workforce.
RESULTS: Of the seven PPE manufacturers investigated, six had at least one product that was marketed as gender and/or size alternatives however, alternative sizes were more common for larger body types. Alternative-sized products rarely included size charts, and the models used to display PPE were overwhelmingly white males of average size.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing availability of alternative-sized PPE, it can be difficult to find these products, which suggests that they are rarely promoted or labeled as alternative-sized. Our study indicates that companies should expand their product lines and more aggressively market and promote these items. Guidance on how to properly fit their products would also be extremely helpful to the end-user. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Manufacturers could improve the availability of alternative-sized PPE and increase their promotion of these products on their websites and in their catalogs. Individual companies and safety professionals may assist in this process by demonstrating demand for alternative-sized PPE. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Marketing; Occupational safety and health; PPE; Translation research; Workforce diversity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29203022     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Safety Res        ISSN: 0022-4375


  4 in total

1.  The Evaluation of Personal Protective Equipment Usage Habit of Mining Employees Using Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Nilufer Kursunoglu; Seyhan Onder; Mustafa Onder
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2022-03-15

2.  Personal Protective Equipment Availability and Utilization Among Interventionalists.

Authors:  André Rose; William Ian Duncombe Rae
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2018-10-10

Review 3.  Envisioning the future of work to safeguard the safety, health, and well-being of the workforce: A perspective from the CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Authors:  Sara L Tamers; Jessica Streit; Rene Pana-Cryan; Tapas Ray; Laura Syron; Michael A Flynn; Dawn Castillo; Gary Roth; Charles Geraci; Rebecca Guerin; Paul Schulte; Scott Henn; Chia-Chia Chang; Sarah Felknor; John Howard
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.079

4.  Sex, gender and COVID-19: a call to action.

Authors:  Sofia B Ahmed; Sandra M Dumanski
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-09-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.