Pnina Gershon1, Chunming Zhu2, Sheila G Klauer3, Tom Dingus3, Bruce Simons-Morton2. 1. Health Behavior Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, United States. Electronic address: pnina.gershon@nih.gov. 2. Health Behavior Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, United States. 3. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Teen drivers' over-involvement in crashes has been attributed to a variety of factors, including distracted driving. With the rapid development of in-vehicle systems and portable electronic devices, the burden associated with distracted driving is expected to increase. The current study identifies predictors of secondary task engagement among teenage drivers and provides basis for interventions to reduce distracted driving behavior. We described the prevalence of secondary tasks by type and driving conditions and evaluated the associations between the prevalence of secondary task engagement, driving conditions, and selected psychosocial factors. METHODS: The private vehicles of 83 newly-licensed teenage drivers were equipped with Data Acquisition Systems (DAS), which documented driving performance measures, including secondary task engagement and driving environment characteristics. Surveys administered at licensure provided psychosocial measures. RESULTS: Overall, teens engaged in a potentially distracting secondary task in 58% of sampled road clips. The most prevalent types of secondary tasks were interaction with a passenger, talking/singing (no passenger), external distraction, and texting/dialing the cell phone. Secondary task engagement was more prevalent among those with primary vehicle access and when driving alone. Social norms, friends' risky driving behaviors, and parental limitations were significantly associated with secondary task prevalence. In contrast, environmental attributes, including lighting and road surface conditions, were not associated with teens' engagement in secondary tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that teens engaged in secondary tasks frequently and poorly regulate their driving behavior relative to environmental conditions. Practical applications: Peer and parent influences on secondary task engagement provide valuable objectives for countermeasures to reduce distracted driving among teenage drivers.
INTRODUCTION: Teen drivers' over-involvement in crashes has been attributed to a variety of factors, including distracted driving. With the rapid development of in-vehicle systems and portable electronic devices, the burden associated with distracted driving is expected to increase. The current study identifies predictors of secondary task engagement among teenage drivers and provides basis for interventions to reduce distracted driving behavior. We described the prevalence of secondary tasks by type and driving conditions and evaluated the associations between the prevalence of secondary task engagement, driving conditions, and selected psychosocial factors. METHODS: The private vehicles of 83 newly-licensed teenage drivers were equipped with Data Acquisition Systems (DAS), which documented driving performance measures, including secondary task engagement and driving environment characteristics. Surveys administered at licensure provided psychosocial measures. RESULTS: Overall, teens engaged in a potentially distracting secondary task in 58% of sampled road clips. The most prevalent types of secondary tasks were interaction with a passenger, talking/singing (no passenger), external distraction, and texting/dialing the cell phone. Secondary task engagement was more prevalent among those with primary vehicle access and when driving alone. Social norms, friends' risky driving behaviors, and parental limitations were significantly associated with secondary task prevalence. In contrast, environmental attributes, including lighting and road surface conditions, were not associated with teens' engagement in secondary tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated that teens engaged in secondary tasks frequently and poorly regulate their driving behavior relative to environmental conditions. Practical applications: Peer and parent influences on secondary task engagement provide valuable objectives for countermeasures to reduce distracted driving among teenage drivers.
Authors: Thomas A Dingus; Feng Guo; Suzie Lee; Jonathan F Antin; Miguel Perez; Mindy Buchanan-King; Jonathan Hankey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sheila G Klauer; Feng Guo; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Marie Claude Ouimet; Suzanne E Lee; Thomas A Dingus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sheila G Klauer; Bruce Simons-Morton; Suzanne E Lee; Marie Claude Ouimet; E Henry Howard; Thomas A Dingus Journal: Traffic Inj Prev Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 1.491
Authors: Vieri Lastrucci; Francesco Innocenti; Chiara Lorini; Alice Berti; Caterina Silvestri; Marco Lazzeretti; Fabio Voller; Guglielmo Bonaccorsi Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Vieri Lastrucci; Francesco Innocenti; Chiara Lorini; Alice Berti; Caterina Silvestri; Marco Lazzeretti; Fabio Voller; Guglielmo Bonaccorsi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 3.390