Literature DB >> 29202672

Sensitivity and specificity levels of two rapid assays for antibodies to Anaplasma spp. in dogs.

Jiayou Liu1,2,3, Matthew Eberts1,2,3, Hannah Bewsey1,2,3, Thomas P O'Connor1,2,3, Ramaswamy Chandrashekar1,2,3, Edward B Breitschwerdt1,2,3.   

Abstract

Canine anaplasmosis is a tick-borne disease of dogs that results following infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum or Anaplasma platys. The SNAP 4Dx Plus test (IDEXX Laboratories) and the VetScan Canine Anaplasma Rapid test (Abaxis) are commercial in-house rapid tests for the detection of antibody to these 2 antigenically related Anaplasma species. We evaluated 2 tests using serum and whole blood samples obtained from reference laboratories and veterinary hospitals. Samples were obtained from regions of the country known to be habitats of the primary tick vectors. The A. phagocytophilum sample set comprised 236 dog sera from the northeastern and midwestern United States; the A. platys sample set comprised 179 sera from dogs living in the southwestern United States. An indirect immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test and an A. platys species-specific ELISA were used as reference assays for the A. phagocytophilum and A. platys samples, respectively. The SNAP test demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (84.7% for A. phagocytophilum and 83.1% for A. platys), compared to the VetScan test (39.0% for A. phagocytophilum and 57.6% for A. platys). The specificity of the SNAP test (95.8% for A. phagocytophilum and 99.2% for A. platys) was significantly greater than the VetScan test (85.6% for A. phagocytophilum and 82.5% for A. platys). In a separate clinic study, conducted within an A. phagocytophilum-endemic state (Minnesota) using 154 whole blood samples from client-owned dogs, the VetScan test was negative for 22 of 39 SNAP and IFA seropositive samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaplasma phagocytophilum; dogs; tick-borne diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29202672      PMCID: PMC6505878          DOI: 10.1177/1040638717745932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  19 in total

1.  Typical and atypical manifestations of Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in dogs.

Authors:  Matthew D Eberts; Pedro Paulo Vissotto de Paiva Diniz; Melissa J Beall; Brett A Stillman; Ramaswamy Chandrashekar; Edward B Breitschwerdt
Journal:  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.023

Review 2.  The increasing recognition of rickettsial pathogens in dogs and people.

Authors:  William L Nicholson; Kelly E Allen; Jennifer H McQuiston; Edward B Breitschwerdt; Susan E Little
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2010-03-06

3.  Anaplasmosis in dogs: the relation of haematological, biochemical and clinical alterations to antibody titre and PCR confirmed infection.

Authors:  Urska Ravnik; Natasa Tozon; Katja Strasek Smrdel; Tatjana Avsic Zupanc
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Comparison of an indirect immunofluorescence assay, western blot analysis, and a commercially available ELISA for detection of Ehrlichia canis antibodies in canine sera.

Authors:  Thomas P O'Connor; Jancy L Hanscom; Barbara C Hegarty; Randall G Groat; Edward B Breitschwerdt
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.156

Review 5.  Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Susan E Little
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.093

6.  Experimental infection and co-infection of dogs with Anaplasma platys and Ehrlichia canis: hematologic, serologic and molecular findings.

Authors:  Sd Gaunt; Mj Beall; Ba Stillman; L Lorentzen; Ppvp Diniz; R Chandrashekar; Eb Breitschwerdt
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Serological and molecular prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Ehrlichia species in dogs from Minnesota.

Authors:  Melissa J Beall; Ramaswamy Chandrashekar; Matthew D Eberts; Katie E Cyr; Pedro Paulo V P Diniz; Celine Mainville; Barbara C Hegarty; John M Crawford; Edward B Breitschwerdt
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.133

8.  Prevalence and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in the United States: results of a national clinic-based serologic survey.

Authors:  Dwight Bowman; Susan E Little; Leif Lorentzen; James Shields; Michael P Sullivan; Ellen P Carlin
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.738

9.  High prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in dogs from an Indian reservation in northeastern Arizona.

Authors:  Pedro Paulo V P Diniz; Melissa J Beall; Karina Omark; Ramaswamy Chandrashekar; Daryn A Daniluk; Katie E Cyr; James F Koterski; Richard G Robbins; Pamela G Lalo; Barbara C Hegarty; Edward B Breitschwerdt
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.133

10.  Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in dogs: 34 cases (2000-2007).

Authors:  Jennifer L Granick; P Jane Armstrong; Jeff B Bender
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 1.936

View more
  1 in total

1.  Serological evidence of Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi and Ehrlichia canis in dogs from the Republic of Korea by rapid diagnostic test kits.

Authors:  Evelyn Alejandra Miranda; Sun-Woo Han; Ji-Min Rim; Yoon-Kyoung Cho; Kyoung-Seong Choi; Joon-Seok Chae
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.672

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.