Literature DB >> 29202667

Percutaneous microwave ablation of renal cell carcinoma using a high power microwave system: focus upon safety and efficacy.

D K Filippiadis1, C Gkizas1, M Chrysofos2, A Siatelis2, G Velonakis1, E Alexopoulou1, A Kelekis1, E Brountzos1, N Kelekis1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous ablation is an expanding, minimally invasive approach for small- to medium-sized renal masses. The purpose of this study is to review safety, and mid-term efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) treatment using a high power microwave system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Institutional database research identified 50 consecutive patients with a single lesion resembling renal cell carcinoma in CT and MRI who underwent percutaneous microwave ablation using a high power microwave system. All patients underwent biopsy on the same session with ablation using an 18G semi-automatic soft tissue biopsy needle. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used for post-ablation follow-up. Patient and tumour characteristics, microwave technique, complications and pattern of recurrence were evaluated.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 74 years (male-female: 31-19). Average lesion size was 3.1 cm (range 2.0-4.3 cm). Biopsy results report RCC (n = 48), inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (n = 1), and non-diagnostic sample (n = 1). The 3-year overall survival was 95.8% (46/48). Two patients died during the 3-year follow-up period due to causes unrelated to the MW ablation and to the RCC. Minor complications including haematomas requiring nothing but observation occurred at 4% (2/50) of the cases. Local recurrence of 6.25% (3/48) was observed with 2/3 cases being re-treated achieving a total clinical success of 97.9% (47/48 lesions).
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous microwave ablation of RCC using a high power microwave system is a safe and efficacious technique for the treatment of small- to medium-sized renal masses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials-thermal ablation; imaging; radiofrequency/microwave; thermal ablation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29202667     DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1408147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  5 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of CT-guided HDR brachytherapy as a local ablative treatment for renal masses: a single-arm pilot trial.

Authors:  R Damm; T Streitparth; P Hass; M Seidensticker; C Heinze; M Powerski; J J Wendler; U B Liehr; K Mohnike; M Pech; J Ricke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Contemporary Evidence for the Management of T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: What IRs Need to Know for Kidney Cancer Tumor Boards.

Authors:  Julie Cronan; Sean Dariushnia; Zachary Bercu; Robert Mitchell Ermentrout; Bill Majdalany; Laura Findeiss; Janice Newsome; Nima Kokabi
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Image-Guided Percutaneous ‎Microwave Ablation Versus Cryoablation For Hepatocellular Carcinoma In High-Risk Locations: Intermediate-Term Results.

Authors:  Jiahui Hu; Sheng Chen; Xin Wang; Ning Lin; Jianchuan Yang; Songsong Wu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Continuous versus pulsed microwave ablation in the liver: any difference in intraoperative pain scores?

Authors:  Dimitrios Filippiadis; Argyro Mazioti; George Velonakis; Athanasios Tsochantzis; Nevio Tosoratti; Alexis Kelekis; Nikolaos Kelekis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-20

5.  Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Microwave Ablation (MA) in the Treatment of Stage I Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma by CT and MRI Imaging.

Authors:  Jiang Zhu; Si Chen; Yanchen Wang; TongBin Gao; Yongjian Ji; Shenyang Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.682

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.