| Literature DB >> 29202064 |
Han Xiao1,2, Minjin Peng1,3, Hong Yan1,4, Mengting Gao1,4, Jingjing Li1,4,5, Bin Yu6, Hanbo Wu7, Shiyue Li1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Further advancement in schistosomiasis prevention requires new tools to assess protective motivation, and promote innovative intervention program. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an instrument developed based on the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) to predict protective behavior intention against schistosomiasis among adolescents in China.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Instrument; Protection Motivation Theory; Schistosomiasis
Year: 2016 PMID: 29202064 PMCID: PMC5693510 DOI: 10.1186/s41256-016-0015-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Res Policy ISSN: 2397-0642
Fig. 1Frameworks of the Protection Motivation Theory and its seven sub-constructs
Characteristics of The Study Sample
| Variables | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, | 1138 (50.85) | 1100 (49.15) | 2238 (100.00) |
| Chronological Age | |||
| Mean (SD) | 13.22 (1.12) | 13.03 (1.07) | 13.13 (1.10) |
| School grade, | |||
| Grade 7 | 359 (31.55) | 339 (30.82) | 698 (31.19) |
| Grade 8 | 415 (36.46) | 410 (37.27) | 825 (36.86) |
| Grade 9 | 364 (31.99) | 351 (31.91) | 715 (31.95) |
| If single child, | |||
| Yes | 702 (61.69) | 500 (45.45) | 1202 (53.71) |
| No | 436 (38.31) | 600 (54.55) | 1036 (46.29) |
| Father’s education | |||
| Primary or less | 160 (14.06) | 160 (14.55) | 320 (14.30) |
| Middle school | 742 (65.20) | 719 (65.36) | 1461 (65.28) |
| High school or more | 236 (20.74) | 221 (20.09) | 457 (20.42) |
| Mother’s education | |||
| Primary or less | 223 (19.60) | 241 (21.91) | 464 (20.73) |
| Middle school | 705 (61.95) | 672 (61.09) | 1377 (61.53) |
| High school or more | 210 (18.45) | 187 (17.00) | 397 (17.74) |
Results of the Rotated Factor Loading Analysis (Varimax Rotated)
| Item | Factor1 | Factor2 | Factor3 | Factor4 | Factor5 | Factor6 | Factor7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 0.83 | ||||||
| Q2 | 0.82 | ||||||
| Q3 | 0.85 | ||||||
| Q4 | 0.87 | ||||||
| Q5 | 0.81 | ||||||
| Q6 | 0.86 | ||||||
| Q7 | 0.82 | ||||||
| Q8 | 0.56 | ||||||
| Q9 | 0.70 | ||||||
| Q10 | 0.84 | ||||||
| Q11 | 0.83 | ||||||
| Q12 | 0.95 | ||||||
| Q13 | 0.95 | ||||||
| Q14 | 0.65 | ||||||
| Q15 | 0.87 | ||||||
| Q16 | 0.83 | ||||||
| Q17 | 0.84 | ||||||
| Q18 | 0.85 | ||||||
| Eigen values | 2.26 | 2.22 | 1.96 | 1.93 | 1.83 | 1.53 | 1.39 |
| Explained variance (%) | 12.54 | 12.36 | 10.87 | 10.69 | 10.15 | 8.48 | 7.74 |
| Cumulative variance (%) | 12.54 | 24.90 | 35.77 | 46.46 | 56.61 | 65.09 | 72.83 |
Items of 18-Item Instrument Based on PMT for predicting Intention to Engage in Protective Behaviors against Schistosomiasis among middle school students in rural China
| Item by constructs | Mean (SD) | r with total |
|---|---|---|
| Q1. My whole family will suffer if I am infected with schistosomiasis | 2.87 (1.22) | 0.29 |
| Q2. I will become hopeless for the rest of my life if I am infected with schistosomiasis. | 2.43 (1.16) | 0.31 |
| Q3. I will get infected if I contact snail-conditioned water while assisting my parents to work. | 4.32 (0.84) | 0.15 |
| Q4. I will get infected if I play with or swim in snail-conditioned water. | 4.39 (0.81) | 0.18 |
| Q5. If I wade through water or walk in wetland in snail-conditioned areas without protection, I will get infected. | 4.36 (0.83) | 0.15 |
| Q6. It is very enjoyable for me to play in water outside. | 2.05 (1.26) | 0.47 |
| Q7. It is convenient to wash my hands and feet in rivers and ponds. | 1.99 (1.25) | 0.51 |
| Q8. It will be more convenient to assist parents’ work or play in snail-conditioned water without protective measures. | 2.02 (1.31) | 0.49 |
| Q9. Playing in outdoor water with classmates is good for making friends and for strengthening friendship. | 1.90 (1.10) | 0.53 |
| Q10. Washing my hands and feet or clothes in river and ponds will save tap water, save money for my family. | 1.90 (1.14) | 0.57 |
| Q11. It will save money if assisting parents’ work or playing in water without protection (water shoes, protective gels such as plant cercaricide Fangyouling). | 1.72 (1.01) | 0.56 |
| Q12. I will never be infected if I do not play in snail-conditioned water. | 2.76 (1.14) | 0.44 |
| Q13. I will never get infected if I do not assist parents’ work in snail-conditioned water. | 2.80 (1.12) | 0.44 |
| Q14. I can control myself not to go and play in snail-conditioned water. | 4.20 (1.02) | 0.17 |
| Q15. I can definitely say “no” even if my friends invite me to play in snail-conditioned water. | 4.47 (0.92) | 0.11 |
| Q16. I can definitely say “no” even if my parents or teachers ask me to do things that may involve snail-conditioned water. | 4.38 (0.98) | 0.11 |
| Q17. My friends may tease me if I refuse to go out with them to play in snail-conditioned water | 2.15 (1.28) | 0.43 |
| Q18. My parents will scold me if I worry about schistosomiasis and refuse to do things in snail-conditioned water. | 1.86 (1.15) | 0.42 |
Cronbach’s α of the PMT instrument, overall and by subsample
| Variables | PMT | S | V | IR | ER | RE | SE | RC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total sample | 0.76 | 0.56 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.90 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| Gender | ||||||||
| Male | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
| Female | 0.75 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.93 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| School grade | ||||||||
| Grade 7 | 0.77 | 0.54 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| Grade 8 | 0.75 | 0.52 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| Grade 9 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
Note: PMT: the PMT instrument, S: severity, V: vulnerability, IR: intrinsic reward, ER: extrinsic reward, RE: response efficacy, SE: self-efficacy, RC: response cost
Fig. 2One-level Seven-Factor Model for the Instrument Based on PMT
Correlations of the Instrument Based on PMT and Protective Behavioral Intention
| PMT Subconstruct | Short-term Behavior Intention | Long-term Behavior Intention |
|---|---|---|
| Severity (S) | 0.05* | 0.05* |
| Vulnerability (V) | 0.20** | 0.21** |
| Intrinsic Reward (IR) | −0.12** | −0.15** |
| Extrinsic Reward (ER) | −0.12** | −0.14** |
| Response Efficacy (RE) | 0.06** | 0.07** |
| Self-Efficacy (SE) | 0.40** | 0.42** |
| Response Cost (RC) | −0.12** | −0.14** |
Note: **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05