Compared with their monometallic counterparts, bimetallic nanoparticles often show enhanced catalytic activity associated with the bimetallic interface. Direct quantitation of catalytic activity at the bimetallic interface is important for understanding the enhancement mechanism, but challenging experimentally. Here using single-molecule super-resolution catalysis imaging in correlation with electron microscopy, we report the first quantitative visualization of enhanced bimetallic activity within single bimetallic nanoparticles. We focus on heteronuclear bimetallic PdAu nanoparticles that present a well-defined Pd-Au bimetallic interface in catalyzing a photodriven fluorogenic disproportionation reaction. Our approach also enables a direct comparison between the bimetallic and monometallic regions within the same nanoparticle. Theoretical calculations further provide insights into the electronic nature of N-O bond activation of the reactant (resazurin) adsorbed on bimetallic sites. Subparticle activity correlation between bimetallic enhancement and monometallic activity suggests that the favorable locations to construct bimetallic sites are those monometallic sites with higher activity, leading to a strategy for making effective bimetallic nanocatalysts. The results highlight the power of super-resolution catalysis imaging in gaining insights that could help improve nanocatalysts.
Compared with their monometallic counterparts, bimetallic nanoparticles often show enhanced catalytic activity associated with the bimetallic interface. Direct quantitation of catalytic activity at the bimetallic interface is important for understanding the enhancement mechanism, but challenging experimentally. Here using single-molecule super-resolution catalysis imaging in correlation with electron microscopy, we report the first quantitative visualization of enhanced bimetallic activity within single bimetallic nanoparticles. We focus on heteronuclear bimetallic PdAu nanoparticles that present a well-definedPd-Au bimetallic interface in catalyzing a photodriven fluorogenic disproportionation reaction. Our approach also enables a direct comparison between the bimetallic and monometallic regions within the same nanoparticle. Theoretical calculations further provide insights into the electronic nature of N-O bond activation of the reactant (resazurin) adsorbed on bimetallic sites. Subparticle activity correlation between bimetallic enhancement and monometallic activity suggests that the favorable locations to construct bimetallic sites are those monometallic sites with higher activity, leading to a strategy for making effective bimetallic nanocatalysts. The results highlight the power of super-resolution catalysis imaging in gaining insights that could help improve nanocatalysts.
Bimetallic
nanoparticles are an important class of nanoscale catalysts
in heterogeneous catalysis; they are widely used in industry due to
the enhanced catalytic properties (i.e., activity, selectivity, and
stability) compared with their monometallic counterparts.[1−3] Many experimental and theoretical efforts have been spent in understanding
the catalytic enhancements from the bimetallic effects.[2,4,5] Two general mechanisms are often
found to operate: (1) electronic (a.k.a. ligand) effect, in which
the electronic properties of the catalytically active metal could
be tuned by the other metal, leading to enhancement in activity;[6] (2) geometric (a.k.a. ensemble) effect, where
two metals together could form highly active surface sites made by
an ensemble of atoms in some specific atomic arrangement.[7,8] It is often challenging to deconvolute completely these two effects.
Nevertheless the catalytic enhancement, in both cases, is a result
of direct metal–metal interactions at the atomic scale, i.e.,
involving interfacing two types of metal components directly.A majority of the scientific insights into bimetallic effects of
nanoparticle catalysts came from studies at the ensemble level, where
a large number of nanoparticles are measured simultaneously.[2,4−14] By varying the composition of the bimetallic nanoparticles (typically
alloy), the location, or the geometry of bimetallic sites, one could
optimize the bimetallic catalysts for the largest activity enhancement.
For such ensemble-averaged measurements, bimetallic nanocatalysts
present particular challenges, however. First, these nanocatalysts
are highly heterogeneous; their differences in catalytic activity
are masked by the ensemble averaging. Second, even on a single bimetallic
nanoparticle, there are both bimetallic and monometallic surface sites;
the latter could contribute
significantly to the measured activity. Spatially resolved activity
measurements within a single catalyst particle are thus desirable.
A recent tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) imaging study showed
that, on a bimetallic PdAu surface, the Pd edge atoms better activate
the reactant than the Pd terrace atoms on a Au(111) surface.[15] Although with high spatial resolution (∼several
nanometers), no quantitation of catalytic activity was available in
such TERS imaging.Single-molecule super-resolution fluorescence
microscopy has emerged
recently as an effective and complementary approach to study catalysis
on nanoscale particles,[16−29] including thermal catalysis,[19−22,29] photocatalysis,[23,24,28] electrocatalysis,[25] and photoelectrocatalysis.[26] Individual nanocatalysts can be interrogated at nanometer
spatial resolution and single-turnover temporal resolution in real
time under operando conditions, where the activity differences among
different nanoparticles or even among different surface sites on the
same nanoparticle can be directly quantified.Here we report
the first single-molecule super-resolution imaging
of the bimetallic effects within single nanoparticle catalysts, in
particular single heteronuclear PdAu nanoparticles in catalyzing a
photodriven fluorogenic disproportionation reaction. The heteronuclear
architecture allows for a clear definition of an interfacial region
between the two metal components and a concurrent comparison with
monometallic regions on the same particle. We directly visualize the
enhanced activity at the bimetallic regions within individual PdAu
nanoparticles. DFT calculations further provide insights into the
mechanism of the enhanced activation of the reactant molecule at bimetallic
vs monometallic surface sites. The correlation between the catalytic
activity of bimetallic and monometallic regions within the same particle
reveals the desirable locations to form bimetallic sites, which could
potentially guide the design of effective bimetallic nanocatalysts.
Results and Discussions
PdAu Nanoparticles Can
Catalyze the Photodriven
Fluorogenic Disproportionation Reaction of Resazurin
We chose
a heteronuclear PdAu bimetallic nanoparticle as a model bimetallic
catalyst. Each PdAu nanoparticle consists of a pentatwinned crystalline
Pd nanorod (∼500–4000 nm in length and 25.5 ± 2.8
nm in diameter) with a pseudospherical Au nanoparticle (∼60–140
nm in diameter) grown on one or both of its tips (Figure A,B and Figure S1).[30] The heteronuclear
architecture and the geometries of the two respective components enable
ready identification of the interface between the two metals in each
PdAu nanoparticle in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterizations.
Elemental line profiling via energy dispersive spectroscopy confirms
the heteronuclear nature with a clearly defined bimetallic junction
between the Pd nanorod and the Au particle (Figure B, lower).
Figure 1
PdAu heteronuclear nanoparticles can catalyze
the photodriven disproportionation
reaction of resazurin to generate resorufin. (A) TEM image of heteronuclear
bimetallic PdAu nanoparticles; structural measurements in Figure S1. (B) Upper: cartoon of PdAu nanoparticle.
Lower: elemental line profile on a PdAu nanoparticle. Cyan, Pd; red,
Au. Yellow line: the position of line scanning. (C) TEM image of mesoporous
silica coated PdAu nanoparticles. (D) Proposed chemical equation of
photodriven disproportionation reaction of resazurin (Rz–) to resorufin (Rf–) and a one-electron-oxidized
radical species (Rz•) catalyzed by Pd or Au catalysts.
(E) Fluorescence spectra of reaction solution containing 30.7 μM
Rz– in 0.2 M pH 7.2 phosphate buffer in the presence
of mesoporous silica coated PdAu nanoparticles under 50 mW 532 nm
laser illumination; the increase of fluorescence at 583 nm indicates
the formation of Rf–. Inset: the fluorescence intensity
at 583 nm vs time profile of the reaction solution with catalysts
under 50 mW 532 nm illumination (black), under 50 mW 488 nm illumination
(red), without catalyst under 50 mW 532 nm excitation (blue), or with
catalyst but no light illumination (green).
PdAu heteronuclear nanoparticles can catalyze
the photodriven disproportionation
reaction of resazurin to generate resorufin. (A) TEM image of heteronuclear
bimetallic PdAu nanoparticles; structural measurements in Figure S1. (B) Upper: cartoon of PdAu nanoparticle.
Lower: elemental line profile on a PdAu nanoparticle. Cyan, Pd; red,
Au. Yellow line: the position of line scanning. (C) TEM image of mesoporous
silica coatedPdAu nanoparticles. (D) Proposed chemical equation of
photodriven disproportionation reaction of resazurin (Rz–) to resorufin (Rf–) and a one-electron-oxidized
radical species (Rz•) catalyzed by Pd or Au catalysts.
(E) Fluorescence spectra of reaction solution containing 30.7 μM
Rz– in 0.2 M pH 7.2 phosphate buffer in the presence
of mesoporous silica coatedPdAu nanoparticles under 50 mW 532 nm
laser illumination; the increase of fluorescence at 583 nm indicates
the formation of Rf–. Inset: the fluorescence intensity
at 583 nm vs time profile of the reaction solution with catalysts
under 50 mW 532 nm illumination (black), under 50 mW 488 nm illumination
(red), without catalyst under 50 mW 532 nm excitation (blue), or with
catalyst but no light illumination (green).We further coated the PdAu nanoparticles with a mesoporous
silica
shell of 114 ± 11 nm thickness (Figure C), which allowed us to use UV-ozone to remove
the organic ligands (e.g., polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)) on PdAu nanoparticles
while maintaining their morphologies (especially the Pd–Au
interface) and the accessibility of the metal surface to the reactant
molecules via the mesopores.[31,32] NaBH4 was
then used to reduce the oxide layer on the metal to activate the surface
for catalysis after UV-ozone treatment. In the subsequent imaging
experiment (see section ), the mesoporous silica shell also facilitates the fluorescence
detection of the catalytic product molecules. These fluorescent product
molecules desorb rapidly from the metal surface after catalytic formation,
but temporarily adsorb onto the walls of the silica mesopores to be
imaged, where the possible fluorescence quenching associated with
direct detection on metal surfaces can also be circumvented (more
discussions in Supporting Information section 2.2). (Note: for simplicity, we use “PdAu nanoparticles”
to refer to these mesoporous silica coated nanoparticles in the writing
below unless specified otherwise.)Past studies have shown that
the nonfluorescent molecule resazurin
(Rz–), upon illumination with 532 nm light, can
disproportionate to a one-electron reduced (Rz2–•) and a one-electron oxidized (Rz•) radical species,[33] and the former one (Rz2–•) can further disproportionate to generate the highly fluorescent
molecule resorufin (Rf–) (two-electron reduced from
Rz–) andresazurin (Rz–).[34]Figure D gives the expected overall reaction equation. We have independently
confirmed this photodriven disproportionation reaction, and further
determined its 3:1 reaction stoichiometry for Rz:Rf (Supporting Information sections 3.1 and 3.2). We found that
the PdAu nanoparticles, as well as their monometallic components,
can catalyze this photodriven fluorogenic reaction (Figure E, and black line in inset, Supporting Information sections 3.1 and 3.2).
Control experiments show that, without the PdAu nanoparticle catalyst
or light, the reaction is insignificant (Figure E inset, blue and green lines). Moreover,
488 nm light, which Rz– does not absorb but which
can excite the conduction band electrons of the metal (Figure S4E), cannot drive this reaction (Figure E inset, red line),
indicating that the photoexcitation of the reactant Rz–, rather than that of the metal, is a key step in the disproportionation
reaction.
Single-Molecule Super-Resolution Catalysis
Imaging of Single PdAu Nanoparticles
The fluorogenic nature
of the photodriven resazurindisproportionation allowed us to use
single-molecule super-resolution fluorescence microscopy to image
this reaction on individual PdAu nanoparticles, an approach we developed
previously.[31,32] In this approach, the particles
were dispersed on a quartz slide within a microfluidic reactor. A
continuous flow of a reactant solution and a constant 532 nm laser
illumination led to a steady-state catalytic kinetics. Using wide-field
total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy, we imaged
the fluorescence of the product resorufin at the single-molecule level
and localized their positions individually with ∼30–40
nm precision. The product molecules reside on the nanoparticle (i.e.,
adsorbed within the mesoporous silica shell) for ∼20 ms on
average (i.e., ∼1 image frame) (Figure S7E) anddo not show significant lateral diffusion (Supporting Information section 4.2.1) before
desorbing anddisappearing into the surrounding solution. We further
confirmed the identity of the product resorufin by measuring the fluorescence
spectrum on single PdAu nanoparticles (Figure S6B).Figure A shows an exemplary map of thousands of product molecules
imaged and localized on a single PdAu nanoparticle; its rod shape
is apparent. Subsequent imaging through SEM independently confirmed
the heteronuclear bimetallic morphology of each particle (Figure B), in which the
Au particle is clearly visible at the tip of the Pd nanorod. Moreover,
many product molecules are detected clearly in the mesoporous shell
region, at distances of greater than ∼40 nm (our localization
precision) away from the long-axis of the PdAu nanoparticle core;
these detections directly support that the products adsorb onto silica-based
sites within the mesopores.
Figure 2
Super-resolution catalysis imaging and single-to-sub
particle level
analysis of reaction kinetics of PdAu nanoparticles. (A) Positions
of ∼2900 products detected on a single mesoporous silica coated
PdAu nanoparticle. (B) SEM image of the nanoparticle in A. (C) Two-dimensional
histogram of product positions on the nanoparticle in panels A and
B in 50 × 50 nm2 bins. The nanoparticle has been reoriented
to align horizontally. Outer white line, structural contour; white
circle, the contour of the Au particle; both determined from the SEM
image in panel B. (D) Segmentation of a typical PdAu nanoparticle:
regions of monometallic Pd (Pd), Au-doped Pd next to the Pd–Au
interface (PdAu), monometallic Au (Au), and Pd-doped Au
next to the Pd–Au interface (AuPd). The end segment
(Pdend) is described in section . (E) Proposed kinetic mechanism of the
catalytic disproportionation. M–Rz–*: a metal-surface-adsorbed excited-state resazurin; n is the number of electrons on the metal; the changes in
electron counts on the metal particle are denoted. (F) Reactant concentration
[Rz–] (black) and 532 nm laser power density I (red) dependences of the turnover rate (TOR) per PdAu
nanoparticle. Solid symbols: the single particle in panels A–C.
Open symbols: results averaged over 53 nanoparticles. Error bars:
SEM for y and SD for x. Solid and
dashed lines: global fits of eq . (G, H) [Rz–] and I dependences
of specific turnover rates of the segments (Pd, PdAu, Au,
AuPd) for the nanoparticle in panels A–C.
Super-resolution catalysis imaging and single-to-sub
particle level
analysis of reaction kinetics of PdAu nanoparticles. (A) Positions
of ∼2900 products detected on a single mesoporous silica coatedPdAu nanoparticle. (B) SEM image of the nanoparticle in A. (C) Two-dimensional
histogram of product positions on the nanoparticle in panels A and
B in 50 × 50 nm2 bins. The nanoparticle has been reoriented
to align horizontally. Outer white line, structural contour; white
circle, the contour of the Au particle; both determined from the SEM
image in panel B. (D) Segmentation of a typical PdAu nanoparticle:
regions of monometallic Pd (Pd), Au-dopedPd next to the Pd–Au
interface (PdAu), monometallic Au (Au), andPd-dopedAu
next to the Pd–Au interface (AuPd). The end segment
(Pdend) is described in section . (E) Proposed kinetic mechanism of the
catalytic disproportionation. M–Rz–*: a metal-surface-adsorbed excited-state resazurin; n is the number of electrons on the metal; the changes in
electron counts on the metal particle are denoted. (F) Reactant concentration
[Rz–] (black) and 532 nm laser power density I (red) dependences of the turnover rate (TOR) per PdAu
nanoparticle. Solid symbols: the single particle in panels A–C.
Open symbols: results averaged over 53 nanoparticles. Error bars:
SEM for y and SD for x. Solid anddashed lines: global fits of eq . (G, H) [Rz–] and I dependences
of specific turnover rates of the segments (Pd, PdAu, Au,
AuPd) for the nanoparticle in panels A–C.We titrated the reactant concentration
[Rz–]
and the incident 532 nm laser power density I, and
examined how the catalytic activity of individual PdAu nanoparticles
depends on them. Over the course of these titrations, the catalytic
activity of the particles showed no significant deactivation for ∼6
h (Figure S12A). We further accounted for
potential changes in fluorescence detection efficiency due to changes
in background noises during these titrations (Supporting Information section 4.2.2).With increasing
[Rz–], the turnover rates of
PdAu nanoparticles follow the classic Langmuir saturation kinetics
for heterogeneous catalysis, both at the single-particle level and
after ensemble averaging (Figure F), further supporting that the catalysis here is mediated
on metal surfaces, in which the mass transport through the silica
mesopores does not limit reaction kinetics (otherwise a linear dependence
on [Rz–] is expected). With increasing I, the turnover rates of individual particles increase linearly (Figure F), in contrast to
the quadratic power dependence of the uncatalyzed photodriven disproportionation
reaction (Figure S4F). This linear power
dependence suggests that the rate-limiting step of the catalytic reaction
merely involves one photoexcited reactant molecule, resazurin (Rz–*).Taking together all above results, we formulated
a working kinetic
mechanism of the catalytic disproportionation (Figure E; details in Supporting Information section 4.4). The reduction part of disproportionation
is imageddirectly in our experiments, in which a surface-adsorbed
photoexcitedresazurin (M–Rz–*, n is the number of electrons on
the metal catalyst particle) obtained two electrons from the catalyst
to generate resorufin (Rf–). For the oxidation part,
which is not directly measured, we proposed that it is a surface-adsorbed
excited-state resazurin that donates one electron to the metal catalyst
generating a neutral radical (Rz•), giving the overall
reaction as that in Figure D. This mechanism gives the catalytic turnover rate v as (derivation in Supporting Information section 4.4)Here k is a catalytic rate
constant and K is a reactant adsorption equilibrium
constant on the metal surface. This equation predicts the saturating
kinetics on [Rz–] and the linear dependence on I, as observed experimentally (Figure F). By globally fitting both [Rz–] and I dependences of v, we extracted k and K of PdAu nanoparticles at both the
single-particle and the ensemble-averaged level.
Subparticle Analysis Reveals Enhanced Catalytic
Activity around the Pd–Au Interface
The unique patterns
of nanoparticles allowed us to overlay their super-resolution catalysis
images onto their respective SEM images with ∼40 nm precision
(Figure C; and Figure S10), on which the Pd–Au interface
of the heteronuclear particle can be readily located in reference
to the Au particle position. A higher catalytic activity (i.e., more
reaction products) is apparent around the interfacial region (Figure C), suggesting a
direct, and first-of-its-kind, visualization of bimetallic effect
of catalytic enhancement.We then dissected each heteronuclear
PdAu nanoparticle into four different regions (Figure D): (1) a 100 nm long segment of the Pd nanorod
adjacent to the interface, i.e., PdAu region, corresponding
to a bimetallic component that is dominantly Pd with minor Audoping
on the surface from the attachedAu particle (Figure B, lower); (2) the rest of Pd nanorod away
from the interface (excluding the other end of the Pd nanorod), representing
the monometallic Pd component; (3) the Au hemisphere adjacent to the
interface, i.e., AuPd region, corresponding to the other
bimetallic component that is dominantly Au with minor Pddoping (Figure B, lower); and (4)
the other hemisphere of Au, representing the monometallic Au component.
The dimensions of all four regions are significantly larger than our
spatial resolution (30–40 nm) to make these subparticle dissections
physically meaningful. The specific catalytic rates of all four regions
show saturation kinetics with increasing reactant concentration [Rz–] and a linear dependence on the light power density I (Figure G,H), as observed for the whole particle (Figure F). Fitting these results with eq gave the catalytic rate constant k and the reactant adsorption equilibrium constant K of each region for each PdAu nanoparticle.Pooling
results from 53 PdAu nanoparticles, the catalytic rate
constants k of the bimetallic PdAu andAuPd regions are ∼50% more active on average than
their monometallic Pd andAu counterparts (Figure A and Figure S12B), directly reporting bimetallic catalytic enhancement. On the other
hand, the reactant adsorption equilibrium constant K shows an opposite trend: the K of bimetallic regions
are ∼30% smaller on average than their monometallic counterparts
(Figure B). Furthermore,
for each type of region, the k and K of individual PdAu nanoparticles are anticorrelated (Figure C,D). Therefore, the enhanced
catalytic activity at bimetallic regions is associated with weakened
reactant adsorption, rationalizable by transition state theory, in
which a less stable reactant is closer in energy to the transition
state resulting in a lower activation barrier.
Figure 3
Subparticle catalytic
properties of bimetallic vs monometallic
regions. (A, B) The catalytic rate constant k (A)
and reactant adsorption equilibrium constant K (B)
of the bimetallic regions (PdAu, AuPd) vs monometallic
regions (Pd, Au). Upper: results of individual nanoparticles; each
dot is one PdAu nanoparticle. Lower: ensemble averages; error bars
are SEM. (C, D) Scatter plots of k vs K for each type of region of individual PdAu nanoparticles; each dot
is one region from one PdAu nanoparticle. ρ is Pearson’s
cross correlation coefficient.
Subparticle catalytic
properties of bimetallic vs monometallic
regions. (A, B) The catalytic rate constant k (A)
and reactant adsorption equilibrium constant K (B)
of the bimetallic regions (PdAu, AuPd) vs monometallic
regions (Pd, Au). Upper: results of individual nanoparticles; each
dot is one PdAu nanoparticle. Lower: ensemble averages; error bars
are SEM. (C, D) Scatter plots of k vs K for each type of region of individual PdAu nanoparticles; each dot
is one region from one PdAu nanoparticle. ρ is Pearson’s
cross correlation coefficient.Control measurements and analyses show that (1) the mesoporous
silica shells of the bimetallic and monometallic regions present equal
accessibility to the reactant molecules (Figure S12E); (2) the fluorescence intensities anddwell times of
the reaction products at the bimetallic regions are indistinguishable
from those at the monometallic regions, and therefore the products
are equally detected at different regions on the same nanoparticle
(Figure S12D, F); and (3) the plasmonic
enhancement effect is insignificant at the bimetallic regions (Supporting Information section 5). Altogether,
these results support that the observed higher product detection rates
at interfacial regions are indeeddue to the bimetallic catalytic
enhancement there.
Breaking the Metal–Metal
Junction Abolishes
the Enhanced Catalytic Activity at Bimetallic Regions
To
further support that the enhanced catalytic activity is indeed related
to the Pd–Au interface in the heteronuclear PdAu nanoparticle,
we broke the Pd–Au junction by heating the PdAu nanoparticles
at 450 °C for 1 h. A nanoscale gap appears between the Pd nanorod
and the Au nanoparticle within the mesoporous silica shell (Figure A; more examples
in Figure S3).
Figure 4
Super-resolution catalysis
imaging of PdAu nanoparticles with nanoscale
gaps (gap-PdAu nanoparticles). (A) TEM image of gap-PdAu nanoparticles
coated with mesoporous silica. Inset: a zoom in. (B) Box plot of the
catalytic rate constant k of the proximal (Aup) and distant (Aud) Au hemispheres with regard
to the Pd nanorods in the gap-PdAu nanoparticles. (C) Two-dimensional
histogram of ∼2500 product locations on a gap-PdAu nanoparticle.
White line: structural contours of the outer shell and the spherical
Au particle. (D) SEM image of the gap-PdAu nanoparticle in C. Inset:
zoom in of the nanogap.
Super-resolution catalysis
imaging of PdAu nanoparticles with nanoscale
gaps (gap-PdAu nanoparticles). (A) TEM image of gap-PdAu nanoparticles
coated with mesoporous silica. Inset: a zoom in. (B) Box plot of the
catalytic rate constant k of the proximal (Aup) anddistant (Aud) Au hemispheres with regard
to the Pd nanorods in the gap-PdAu nanoparticles. (C) Two-dimensional
histogram of ∼2500 product locations on a gap-PdAu nanoparticle.
White line: structural contours of the outer shell and the spherical
Au particle. (D) SEM image of the gap-PdAu nanoparticle in C. Inset:
zoom in of the nanogap.We then imaged these PdAu nanoparticles with nanoscale gaps
(i.e.,
gap-PdAu nanoparticles) in catalyzing the same reaction (Figure C and Figure S14A), and with SEM, in which the gaps
are visible (Figure D and Figure S14B). Strikingly, the enhanced
catalytic activity originally around the Pd–Au interface vanished,
supporting that the enhanced catalytic activity is specific to the
heteronuclear bimetallic structure with direct Pd–Au contact.Since the spherical Au particles are easily identifiable in the
SEM images of these gap-PdAu nanoparticles, onto which the super-resolution
catalysis images were mapped (Figure C,D), we compared the catalytic kinetics of the Au
hemisphere proximal to the Pd nanorod (i.e., Aup) with
the other hemisphere distant from the nanorod (i.e., Aud). (We could not reliably dissect out a Pd nanorod segment proximal
to the Au particle because the nanorod end at the gap cannot be clearly
located in the SEM image.) No significant differences in the catalytic
rate constants were observed between the two hemispheres (Figure B) (nor in the reactant
adsorption equilibrium constant K; Figure S14C), further supporting that the enhanced catalytic
activity originally around the interface region is specific to the
intact heteronuclear PdAu bimetallic structure.It is worth
noting that heat-breaking the Pd–Au junction
should have left some Pd atoms on the Au particle, and therefore the
proximal Au hemisphere should still behave like a AuPd region.
However, the heating could have homogenized the structural and compositional
differences between the two hemispheres. In any case, the abolishment
of observable catalytic enhancement after breaking the junction supports
that the enhancement is associated with the particular geometry with
direct Pd–Au contact.
Electronic Structure Elucidation
of Reactant
Activation on Monometallic and Bimetallic Surfaces
Resazurin Interaction with Pd and PdAu Surfaces
We performedDFT calculations using the
VASP package[35] to gain more insights into
the activation on Pd, Au, or bimetallic surface sites of resazurin’s
N–O bond, which is cleaved to become resorufin (Figure D; calculation details in Supporting Information sections 6.1–6.3). Although the photodriven disproportionation of resazurin involves
its excited state (Figure E), these ground-state DFT calculations could still inform
on how resazurin’s N–O bond gets activated upon interaction
with metal surfaces. We first examinedresazurin interaction with
a Pd(100) surface, the dominant facets on the sides of Pd nanorods.[30] Note that the actual Pd nanorod side surface
might not be the same as the perfect facet structure because there
are always defects, edges, etc. and the sample preparation procedures
such as NaBH4 reduction might also alter the surface structure.
We chose Pd(100) (andAu(111) later) as a reasonable model surface
for calculation purposes. The optimized adsorption geometry has resazurin
lying flat on the surface (Figure A). The N–O fragment of resazurin is tilted
away from the surface, in which the O atom sits approximately above
the center of four Pd atoms and the N atom is above an edge bridging
two Pd atoms. Importantly, compared with that in the free resazurin
molecule, the N–O bond is elongated by 0.007 Å (Table S2), reflecting its weakening and thus
activation for cleavage, consistent with Pd’s being a catalyst
for the observed reaction.
Figure 5
Electronic interactions of resazurin with Pd
and Au surfaces. (A,
B) Optimized adsorption geometries of resazurin on Pd(100) and Au(111).
The Pd or Au atoms to be substituted for evaluating bimetallic effects
are numbered. (C, D) COHP analyses for the interactions between the
N–O fragment of resazurin and the closest metal atoms on Pd(100)
and Au(111), respectively. The horizontal lines represent the Fermi
level (EF), referenced to the vacuum (E = 0). (E, F) The molecular orbitals of resazurin that
are dominantly πN–O (doubly occupied) and
πN–O* (unoccupied) in nature. (G, H) Schematics of the forward-donation
and back-donation on Pd(100). (I, J) Schematics of the forward-donation
and back-donation on Au(111). Only the N–O fragment of resazurin
is drawn. We use to represent d orbitals
of metal since they are pointed toward N–O. The solid black
circles and triangles mark the projected positions of O and N on the
metal surface, respectively.
Electronic interactions of resazurin with Pd
andAu surfaces. (A,
B) Optimized adsorption geometries of resazurin on Pd(100) andAu(111).
The Pd or Au atoms to be substituted for evaluating bimetallic effects
are numbered. (C, D) COHP analyses for the interactions between the
N–O fragment of resazurin and the closest metal atoms on Pd(100)
andAu(111), respectively. The horizontal lines represent the Fermi
level (EF), referenced to the vacuum (E = 0). (E, F) The molecular orbitals of resazurin that
are dominantly πN–O (doubly occupied) and
πN–O* (unoccupied) in nature. (G, H) Schematics of the forward-donation
and back-donation on Pd(100). (I, J) Schematics of the forward-donation
and back-donation on Au(111). Only the N–O fragment of resazurin
is drawn. We use to represent d orbitals
of metal since they are pointed towardN–O. The solid black
circles and triangles mark the projected positions of O andN on the
metal surface, respectively.We performed crystal orbital Hamiltonian population (COHP)
analysis[36] to examine the interactions
between the N–O
fragment of resazurin and the Pd surface. COHP analysis allows for
an energy-resolved visualization of bonding and antibonding orbital
interactions between specific atoms (Figure C). The interactions mainly come from two
types of Pd–O bonding interactions (Figure C, red shades below the Fermi level). One
type involves N–O bonding orbitals (Figure C, blue line), located energetically below
the Pdd band (at about −14 to −11.5
eV); this type of interaction is referred to as forward-donation.[37] The other type involves N–O antibonding
orbitals, located energetically within the Pdd band
(at about −7.6 to −6.6 eV); this type is referred to
as back-donation.[37]We further performedDFT calculations using the Gaussian package[38] to visualize the molecular orbitals of resazurin
(Supporting Information section 6.6). Two
N–O fragment based orbitals are identified to be likely involved
in the forward- and back-donations between the N–O fragment
and the Pd surface (Supporting Information section 6.6): one a doubly occupied π bonding orbital, denoted
as πN–O (Figure E); the other an unoccupied π* orbital,
denoted as πN–O* (Figure F). Both πN–O and πN–O* have
orbital lobes on the O atom pointing toward the Pd surface for bonding
interactions.Combining the adsorption geometry, the COHP analysis,
and the resazurin
MOs, we schematically depicted the forward-donation and back-donation
interactions between Pd and the O atom of resazurin, labeled as πN–O + d andd + πN–O*, respectively
(Figure G,H). Both
types of interactions weaken the N–O bond of resazurin, consistent
with the elongatedN–O bond of resazurin adsorbed on the Pd(100)
surface. But these two interactions have opposite charge transfer
directions: the forward-donation takes away charge density from a
N–O π bonding orbital, whereas the back-donation injects
charge density into a N–O π* antibonding orbital; the
net charge transfer is from Pd to the N–O fragment (Table S2), indicating that the back-donation
is a more dominant bonding interaction here.To computationally
evaluate how bimetallic sites can possibly enhance
the activation of resazurin’s N–O bond for cleavage,
we substituted by Au the eight surface Pd atoms (numbered in Figure A) that directly
interact with the carbon atoms of resazurin. The substitution was
done one atom at a time to dissect the effect of each substitution
in forming bimetallic Au@Pd(100) surface sites, on which resazurin
adsorption was further geometry optimized. No significant change of
the resazurin adsorption geometry is observed on these model bimetallic
surfaces (Supporting Information section 6.3.1). Among the eight structures on these Au@Pd(100) surfaces, one of
the most stable structures is a Au substitution at the Pd atom no.
2 (Figure A), which
is far from the N–O fragment of the resazurin. Here the O of
N–O is closer to the metal surface andN–O is further
elongated compared to that on Pd(111) (Table S2), indicating a more weakenedN–O bond and likely a bimetallic
effect of enhancing the activation of the N–O bond for cleavage,
even though the secondmetal (i.e., Au here) is not directly bonded
to the N–O fragment. COHP analysis identified the same forward-
and back-donation interactions between Pd and O atoms (Figure S22A). More important, both interactions
increase in magnitude compared with those on monometallic Pd(100)
(Table S4), consistent with the further
weakening and thus enhanced activation of the N–O bond for
cleavage on bimetallic PdAu surfaces.
Resazurin Interactions with Au and AuPd Surfaces
We performed similar calculations of resazurin
adsorption on a Au(111) surface. Au(111) surface was chosen as a model
because the capping ligands PVP andiodide, used in the synthesis,
prefer Au(111) facet sites in growing Au nanoparticles.[39,40] The optimized adsorption geometry has resazurin lying flat on the
surface with 4 of its carbons and the O atom of the N–O fragment
sitting on top of Au atoms (Figure B). Moreover, the N–O fragment is tilted toward
the Au surface, suggesting strong interactions between Au and the
N–O fragment; this is in contrast to that of resazurin–Pd(100)
interactions where the N–O fragment is not directly on top
of any Pd atom and is tilted away from the surface (Figure A). The N–O bond is
also elongated (by 0.006 Å) on Au(111) compared with that in
the free resazurin (Table S3), indicating
a weakening of the N–O bond and thus activation toward cleavage.Similarly, we did single Pd atom substitutions for the five Au
atoms sitting directly below the resazurin atoms (Figure B) to evaluate the bimetallic
effect. All five substitutions lead to shorter metal–O bonds
(by ∼0.1 Å) compared with that on the Au(111) surface
(Table S3), indicating even stronger interactions
between the bimetallic surface and the N–O fragment. All of
them also have a further elongatedN–O bond (Table S3), indicating its enhanced activation via the bimetallic
effect.COHP analysis of resazurin on Au(111) identified forward-
and back-donation
interactions between Au and the O atom of the N–O fragment
(Figure D), as in
resazurin–Pd(100) interactions. The orbital overlap pattern
here is different, as the O atom here sits directly on top of a Au
atom (Figure I,J).
The local net charge transfer is from Au to the N–O fragment,
indicating that the back-donation is also more important here (Table S3). For the bimetallic surface Pd@Au(111),
the COHP analysis also shows that both forward- and back-donation
interactions increase between the metal and the N–O fragment
(Table S4), leading to further activation
of N–O.Altogether, DFT calculations show that both substituting
Pd by
Au on Pd(100) and substituting Au by Pd on Au(111) could give a more
lengthenedN–O bond, from increases in both forward- and back-donation
interactions, leading to the enhanced activation of the N–O
bond for cleavage on the bimetallic surfaces.
Activity Correlation within Single Particle
Reveals Optimal Locations for Bimetallic Sites
Our subparticle
level activity quantitation also allowed us to examine how the activity
enhancements of the bimetallic regions are related to the activity
of the corresponding monometallic regions within the same particle
(Figure A,B, black
and red points); the latter would represent the original “monometallic”
activity of the bimetallic region before the secondmetal was introduced.
Strikingly, positive correlations are clearly observed. For the particles
whose monometallic Pd region has higher catalytic rate constant k, their bimetallic activity enhancement ΔkBI (defined as k(PdAu) – k(Pd)) of the bimetallic PdAu region is also larger (Figure A). The same trend applies to the bimetallic AuPd region (Figure B). These trends indicate that when the particle, Pd or Au,
is more active, the bimetallic enhancement is larger.
Figure 6
Rational strategy for
generating more active bimetallic PdAu nanocatalysts.
(A) Correlation between the catalytic activity enhancement of the
bimetallic PdAu region and the monometallic Pd region on
the same heteronuclear PdAu nanoparticle. Each black dot is a single
PdAu nanoparticle. Hollow red squares are binned and averaged results.
The pure single Pd nanorods (pink) serve as the control. ρ is
Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the individual particles.
(B) Same as panel A, but for the bimetallic AuPd vs the
monometallic Au regions with pure Au nanoparticles (pink) as the control.
(C) The catalytic rate constant k of the side and
end regions of Pd nanorods (average from 46 nanoparticles). (D) Schematic
of the proposed strategy to deposit the second metal onto the ends
of nanorods of the first metal. Error bars are SEM for all y-axes and SD for all x-axes.
Rational strategy for
generating more active bimetallic PdAu nanocatalysts.
(A) Correlation between the catalytic activity enhancement of the
bimetallic PdAu region and the monometallic Pd region on
the same heteronuclear PdAu nanoparticle. Each black dot is a single
PdAu nanoparticle. Hollow red squares are binned and averaged results.
The pure single Pd nanorods (pink) serve as the control. ρ is
Pearson’s correlation coefficient for the individual particles.
(B) Same as panel A, but for the bimetallic AuPd vs the
monometallic Au regions with pure Au nanoparticles (pink) as the control.
(C) The catalytic rate constant k of the side and
end regions of Pd nanorods (average from 46 nanoparticles). (D) Schematic
of the proposed strategy to deposit the secondmetal onto the ends
of nanorods of the first metal. Error bars are SEM for all y-axes and SD for all x-axes.As a control, we also analyzed the corresponding
subparticle regions
of pure single Pd nanorods and single Au particles, which are minor
components in the sample and imaged together with PdAu bimetallic
nanoparticles. For each Pd nanorod, we compared the activity of the
end regions adjacent to the two tips (which are at the same location
as the bimetallic PdAu region in a PdAu nanoparticle) with
the side activity (excluding the ends), which corresponds to the monometallic
Pd region in a PdAu nanoparticle. For each Au nanoparticle, we arbitrarily
dissected it into two hemispheres vertically and compared the left
vs right hemisphere. Neither of the two controls shows any significant
correlation (Figure A,B, pink points), indicating that possible intraparticle activity
heterogeneity would not give the observed positive correlations between
the bimetallic activity enhancement and the original monometallic
activity.These positive correlations suggest that, to obtain
larger bimetallic
activity enhancement, one shoulddeposit the secondmetal onto originally
more active monometallic surface sites of Pd or Au, constituting a
possible rationalized strategy in making more active bimetallic nanoparticle
catalysts. Implementing this strategy would require one to (1) identify
what types of surface sites are more active on the initial monometallic
particle and (2) selectively deposit the secondmetal onto the more
active sites of the first metal.Structurally anisotropic nanoparticles,
such as 1-dimensional nanorods,
offer opportunities to fulfill these two requirements. Regarding requirement
1, our previous study has identified that, for Au nanorods, their
two ends are generally more active than their side facets in catalyzing
an oxidative deacetylation reaction, possibly due to the higher activity
of low coordination surface sites abundant at the ends.[31] Here we found the same phenomenon on Pd nanorods:
their free end segment Pdend (Figure D) in the heteronuclear PdAu bimetallic particle
is more active than their side facets (Figure C). Regarding requirement 2, one could utilize
appropriate capping ligands that could selectively bind to the side
facets of the first metal nanorods, leaving the two ends preferentially
for the deposition of the secondmetal (Figure D). (Note that, for generating just bimetallic
PdAu sites, the deposition of Au would certainly need to
be much less in quantity to not grow a big Au particle.) Subsequent
removal of the capping ligands would result in a bimetallic system
where the secondmetal is at the desired higher activity sites of
the first metal. Interestingly, this scheme is what underlies the
synthesis of the heteronuclear bimetallic PdAu nanorod–nanoparticle
in the current study, in which the Au particle grew selectively at
the ends of Pd nanorods and the side facets of Pd nanorods were preferentially
blocked by the PVP andiodide ligands.[30] Similar strategies have been reported in synthesizing Pd-tippedAu nanorods[41] andPd-edged Ag nanocubes[42] for detecting catalytic products via surface-enhanced
Raman scattering, andPt-tippedAu nanorods for surface-plasmon-enhanced
catalysis.[43] With appropriate ligands,
one could expect this synthesis strategy to be applicable to particles
that are less structurally anisotropic (e.g., pseudospheres) for generating
bimetallic sites at desired locations.
Conclusions
In summary, using single-molecule super-resolution catalysis imaging
in correlation with SEM, we have directly visualized and quantified
the bimetallic activity enhancement on heteronuclear PdAu nanoparticles
at the subparticle level in catalyzing the photodriven disproportionation
of resazurin. DFT calculations provide insights into the electronic
nature of the activation of the resazurin N–O bond on the metal
surfaces via synergistic forward- and back-donation interactions.
The results further suggest that higher activity monometallic sites
are the optimal locations to form bimetallic sites for larger activity
enhancement, demonstrating the effectiveness of the super-resolution
catalysis imaging approach in deriving knowledge for guiding the development
of better nanocatalysts.
Authors: Maarten B J Roeffaers; Bert F Sels; Hiroshi Uji-I; Frans C De Schryver; Pierre A Jacobs; Dirk E De Vos; Johan Hofkens Journal: Nature Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: P Winkler; J Zeininger; Y Suchorski; M Stöger-Pollach; P Zeller; M Amati; L Gregoratti; G Rupprechter Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 14.919