| Literature DB >> 29201913 |
Wenshuang Sun1, Jia Meng1, Zhenheng Wang1, Tao Yuan1, Hong Qian1, Wenxiang Chen1, Jian Tong1, Yu Xie1, Ya Zhang1, Jianning Zhao1, Nirong Bao1.
Abstract
Proanthocyanidins (PCs) have shown inhibition of oxidative damage by improving Nrf-2 expression in many tissues. However, the cytoprotective effects of PCs on H2O2-induced tendon damage have not been verified. The current study was aimed at assessing the cytoprotection of PCs on the oxidative cellular toxicity of tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs) induced by H2O2. The TDSCs were isolated from patellar tendons of Sprague Dawley (SD) rats, and the cells after third passage were used for subsequent experiments. The isolated cells were identified by flow cytometry assay and multidifferentiation potential assay. Cell Counting Kit-8 assay was performed to examine cell viability. Real-Time PCR and Western Blot were employed to, respectively, assess the mRNA and protein expressions of Nrf-2, GCLM, NQO-1, and HO-1. PCs significantly improved the cell viability of TDSCs. Furthermore, H2O2 upregulated Nrf-2, GCLM, NQO-1, and HO-1 without significant difference, while the proteins expressions were increased with significant difference in PCs group and PCs + H2O2 cotreated group. All the findings indicated that PCs could protect against the oxidative damage induced by H2O2 in TDSCs, and the cytoprotective effects might be due to the ability of PCs to activate the expressions of GCLM, HO-1, and NQO-1 via upregulating Nrf-2 signaling pathway.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29201913 PMCID: PMC5671684 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7529104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Primers for Real-Time PCR.
| Gene | Type | Primers | Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nrf-2 | F | 5′-GGACATGGAGCAAGTTTGGC-3′ | 102 |
| R | 5′-GGGCTGGGGACAGTGGTAGT-3′ | ||
| GCLM | F | 5′-ATCATGGCTTCCCCTCCAAT-3′ | 70 |
| R | 5′-CCTCCCAGTAAGGCTGCAAAT-3′ | ||
| NQO-1 | F | 5′-CGGTGAGAAGAGCCCTGAT-3′ | 111 |
| R | 5′-CGACCACCTCCCATCCTT-3′ | ||
| HO-1 | F | 5′-TCACCTTCCCGAGCATCGA-3′ | 119 |
| R | 5′-GGCGGTCTTAGCCTCTTCTGT-3′ | ||
| GAPDH | F | 5′-AGGTCGGTGTGAACGGATTTG-3′ | 95 |
| R | 5′-GGGGTCGTTGATGGCAACA-3′ |
Figure 1TDSCs culture and characterization. Photomicrographs showed the TDSCs morphology at different passages. (a) At P0, TDSCs looked like large polygonal and star-shaped cells. (b) At P3, a homogeneous population of fibroblast-like cells was obtained. Magnification: ×100. Cell size bar: 100 um.
Figure 2The isolated cells were identified by flow cytometry assay with lineage-specific markers and multidifferentiation potential assays. (a) Graphs showed the expression levels of the mesenchymal stem (CD90) and endothelial (CD31) cell markers on TDSCs. Compared to the isotype control, a high percentage of cells expressed CD90, whereas only few cells showed CD31. (b) Osteogenic differentiation assays. Alizarin-red-positive calcium nodules were observed after osteogenic induction of the cells for 3 weeks. Magnification: ×100. Cell size bar: 100 um. (c) Adipogenic differentiation assays. Lipid droplets were formed after incubating the cells in complete medium with adipogenic supplements for 3 weeks. Magnification: ×400. Cell size bar: 25 um. (d) Chondrogenic differentiation assays. Cartilage-like tissues with Alcian blue stained acid glycosaminoglycan were observed, which indicated the formation of extracellular cartilage matrix. Magnification: ×100. Cell size bar: 100 um.
Figure 3PCs reduced H2O2-induced oxidative stress in TDSCs. (a) PCs had no cytotoxic effects on TDSCs (p > 0.05). (b) H2O2 reduced cell viability (%) in TDSCs; data are percentage of cell viability in comparison to the control group, and viability in the 400 μmol/ml was approximately 50%, reflecting IC50. (c) PCs protected TDSCs against H2O2-induced oxidative stress. Obvious differences were observed between the non-PCs and pre-PCs treatment groups, but no significant differences were found among groups pretreated with PCs at various concentrations. H2O2 (+): 400 μmol/ml. All results were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3); p < 0.05, as compared to control group.
Figure 4The effects of PCs on H2O2-induced alterations of Nrf-2, GCLM, HO-1, and NQO-1 mRNA and protein levels. (a) The effects of PCs on alterations of mRNA levels. (b) The effects of PCs on alterations of protein levels. All results were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3); p < 0.05, as compared to control group; #p < 0.05, as compared to H2O2 group.