| Literature DB >> 29201902 |
Ryszard Międzybrodzki1,2,3, Jan Borysowski3, Marlena Kłak1,4, Ewa Jończyk-Matysiak1, Bożena Obmińska-Mrukowicz5, Agnieszka Suszko-Pawłowska5, Barbara Bubak1, Beata Weber-Dąbrowska1, Andrzej Górski1,2,3.
Abstract
Phage preparations used for phage therapy may have not only direct antibacterial action but also immunomodulating effects mediated by phages themselves as well as by bacterial antigens. Therefore phage application in patients with immune disorders, and especially with autoimmune diseases, requires special attention. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of phage lysates (staphylococcal phages A3/R, phi200, and MS-1 cocktail, enterococcal phage 15/P, Pseudomonas phage 119x, and E. coli T4 phage) as well as purified T4 phage on the course of murine collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), commonly used as an animal model of rheumatoid arthritis. Intraperitoneal application of phage lysates or purified T4 phage did not aggravate the course of autoimmune joint disease. Moreover, although endotoxins are known to potentiate CIA, the systemic administration of phage lysate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which contains debris of this Gram-negative bacillus, did not significantly influence CIA although the sonicate of the corresponding bacterial strain did. Interestingly, a purified T4 phage revealed some anti-inflammatory activity when applied under the therapeutic scheme. Our preliminary results do not suggest that phages may aggravate the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis. In contrast T4 phage may even exert an immunosuppressive effect.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29201902 PMCID: PMC5671675 DOI: 10.1155/2017/3612015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Criteria of evaluation of inflammatory process in CIA.
| Total points for a single paw | Corresponding arthritic score (degree of CIA severity in a single paw) |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CIA evaluation criteria and granted points: (1) edema of any interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joint in a single toe—1 point for each involved toe; (2) moderate edema or redness of the metacarpal/metatarsus—2 points; (3) intensive edema of the metacarpal/metatarsus and wrist/ankle—4 points; (4) joint distortion (ankylosis)—10 points.
Figure 1Illustration of intensity of arthritis in mice. (a) Normal front paw (CIA score: 0). (b) Edema of a single digit of the front paw (CIA score: 1). (c) Edema of four digits of the front paw (CIA score: 2). (d) Mild edema of an ankle and edema of all digits of the rear paw (CIA score: 3). (e) Intensive edema of an ankle and edema of all digits of the rear paw (CIA score: 4). (f) Edema and distortion of digits of the rear paw (CIA score: 4).
Figure 2Influence of “therapeutic” intraperitoneal application (once daily from day 22 until day 42 after the first dose of collagen) of phage lysates, sonicate of their hosts, and broth (0.5 ml/mouse) on the course of CIA. (a) T4 phage lysate (2.5 × 109 pfu/mouse) and its host E. coli B strain sonicate (number of mice in groups: n = 7–12). (b) Pseudomonas 119x phage lysate (6 × 105 pfu/mouse) and its host P. aeruginosa 119x strain sonicate (number of mice in groups: n = 10–12). (c) Enterococcal 15/P phage lysate (3.25 × 106 pfu/mouse) and its host E. faecalis 26589 strain sonicate (number of mice in groups: n = 10–12). (d) Staphylococcal A3/R phage lysate (4 × 108 pfu/mouse) and its host S. aureus 19930 strain sonicate (number of mice in groups: n = 9–11). (e) MS-1 staphylococcal phage lysate containing an equal mixture of A5/80, P4/6409, and 676/Z phages, and sonicate of relevant mixture of their host strains (S. aureus 80, S. aureus 6409, and S. aureus 11788) (number of mice in groups: n = 15). (f) Broth used in the process of phage propagation (number of mice in groups: n = 10-11). p < 0.05 in comparison to the control group (Mann–Whitney U test). For clarity reasons only upper or lower error bars representing SE are shown.
Figure 3Influence of “prophylactic” intraperitoneal application (once daily from day 0 until day 21 after the first dose of collagen) of phage lysate, sonicate of their hosts, and broth (0.5 ml/mouse) given on the course of CIA. (a) 119x phage lysate (6 × 105 pfu/mouse) and its host P. aeruginosa 119x strain sonicate (number of mice in groups: n = 12–15). (b) Phi200 phage lysate (1.4 × 107 pfu/mouse) and its host S. aureus 6409 strain sonicate (number of mice in groups: n = 13–15). (c) Broth used in the process of phage propagation (number of mice in groups: n = 13-14). p < 0.05 in comparison to the control group (Mann–Whitney U test). For clarity reasons only upper or lower error bars representing SE are shown.
Figure 4Influence of “therapeutic” intraperitoneal application of purified T4 phage preparation on the course of CIA. Dose of T4 phage in PBS: 5 × 108 pfu/mouse once daily from day 22 until day 42 after the first dose of collagen. Control mice received 0.5 ml of PBS i.p. Number of mice in groups: n = 8–10. Methotrexate dose: 10 mg/kg three times a week (n = 7). p < 0.05 in comparison to the control group (Mann–Whitney U test). For clarity reasons only upper or lower error bars representing SE are shown.
Figure 5Influence of “prophylactic” intraperitoneal application (once daily from 3 days before until 5 days after the first dose of collagen) of purified T4 phage preparation and T4 phage lysate on the course of CIA. (a) Purified T4 phage in PBS: 5 × 108 pfu/mouse (control mice received 0.5 ml of PBS i.p.); number of mice in groups: n = 8–10. (b) T4 phage lysate: 1 × 1010 pfu/mouse; number of mice in groups: n = 8. p < 0.05 in comparison to the control group (Mann–Whitney U test). For clarity reasons only upper or lower error bars representing SE are shown.
Influence of MS-1 staphylococcal phage mixture on weight and cell number of thymus, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes 21 days after ending of its therapeutic application in CIA model in mice.
| Parameter | Control | Bacterial sonicate | MS-1 (lysate) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean | ±SE |
| Mean | ±SE |
| Mean | ±SE | |
| Total body weight (g) | 10 | 15.1 | ±0.3 | 10 | 15.7 | ±0.5 | 10 | 14.6 | ±0.2 |
| Weight of thymus (mg) | 10 | 21.0 | ±1.3 | 10 | 22.4 | ±1.9 | 10 | 21.7 | ±1.2 |
| Weight factor of thymus (×10−3) | 10 | 1.4 | ±0.1 | 10 | 1.4 | ±0.1 | 10 | 1.5 | ±0.1 |
| Number of thymocytes (×103/mm3) | 10 | 282.0 | ±19.0 | 10 | 294.0 | ±23.3 | 10 | 292.0 | ±22.5 |
| Weight of spleen (mg) | 10 | 82.3 | ±1.6 | 10 | 86.4 | ±4.1 | 10 | 74.8 | ±4.9 |
| Weight factor of spleen (×10−3) | 10 | 5.5 | ±0.1 | 10 | 5.5 | ±0.2 | 10 | 5.1 | ±0.3 |
| Number of splenocytes (×103/mm3) | 10 | 592.0 | ±38.1 | 10 | 682.0 | ±45.0 | 10 | 776.0 | ±57.3 |
| Weight of mesenteric lymph nodes (mg) | 10 | 29.3 | ±1.9 | 10 | 33.7 | ±2.9 | 10 | 26.6 | ±1.1 |
| Weight factor of mesenteric lymph nodes (×10−3) | 10 | 1.9 | ±0.1 | 10 | 2.1 | ±0.1 | 10 | 1.8 | ±0.1 |
| Number of mesenteric lymph node cells (×103/mm3) | 10 | 314.0 | ±22.3 | 10 | 268.0 | ±20.0 | 10 | 332.0 | ±19.6 |
p < 0.05 when compared to control group (one-way ANOVA, post hoc Scheffe's test).
Influence of MS-1 staphylococcal phage mixture on lymphocyte populations of thymus, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes 21 days after ending of its therapeutic application in CIA model in mice.
| Cell population | Phenotype | Control | Bacterial sonicate | MS-1 (lysate) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean | ±SE [%] |
| Mean | ±SE [%] |
| Mean | ±SE [%] | ||
| Thymocytes | CD8+ | 10 | 2.1 | ±0.1 | 10 | 1.6 | ±0.2 | 10 | 2.3 | ±0.3 |
| CD4+ | 10 | 12.2 | ±0.9 | 10 | 12.4 | ±0.7 | 10 | 13.0 | ±1.1 | |
| CD4+CD8+ | 10 | 79.6 | ±1.5 | 10 | 75.0 | ±7.7 | 10 | 77.9 | ±1.5 | |
| CD4−CD8− | 10 | 6.1 | ±0.7 | 10 | 3.0 | ±0.9 | 10 | 6.8 | ±1.2 | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Splenocytes | CD3+ | 9 | 17.5 | ±0.5 | 10 | 26.7 | ±4.6 | 10 | 22.1 | ±1.1 |
| CD19+ | 9 | 75.2 | ±1.5 | 10 | 67.2 | ±5.3 | 10 | 71.4 | ±0.9 | |
| CD8+ | 10 | 2.4 | ±0.2 | 10 | 3.5 | ±0.3 | 10 | 3.3 | ±0.3 | |
| CD4+ | 10 | 7.7 | ±0.4 | 10 | 11.3 | ±0.4 | 10 | 10.7 | ±0.5 | |
| CD4+CD8+ | 10 | 2.6 | ±0.6 | 10 | 1.6 | ±0.4 | 10 | 1.6 | ±0.3 | |
| CD4−CD8− | 10 | 87.3 | ±0.9 | 10 | 83.6 | ±0.6 | 10 | 84.7 | ±0.9 | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Mesenteric lymph node cells | CD3+ | 9 | 32.7 | ±1.1 | 10 | 35.5 | ±1.2 | 7 | 35.6 | ±1.7 |
| CD19+ | 9 | 58.4 | ±2.5 | 10 | 57.7 | ±2.0 | 7 | 58.1 | ±1.2 | |
| CD8+ | 9 | 4.8 | ±0.5 | 9 | 4.8 | ±0.2 | 7 | 5.1 | ±0.3 | |
| CD4+ | 9 | 18.7 | ±0.7 | 9 | 24.6 | ±1.0 | 7 | 23.3 | ±2.1 | |
| CD4+CD8+ | 9 | 6.7 | ±2.9 | 9 | 3.2 | ±0.4 | 7 | 2.6 | ±0.8 | |
| CD4−CD8− | 9 | 69.8 | ±3.1 | 9 | 67.4 | ±1.1 | 7 | 69.0 | ±2.0 | |
p < 0.05 when compared to control group (one-way ANOVA, post hoc Scheffe's test); p < 0.05 when compared to bacterial sonicate treated group (one-way ANOVA, post hoc Scheffe's test).