Literature DB >> 29201863

Predictive Assessment of Cancer Center Catchment Area from Electronic Health Records.

Luca Salmasi1, Enrico Capobianco2.   

Abstract

Healthcare facilities (HF) may identify catchment areas (CA) by selecting criteria that depend on various factors. These refer to hospital activities, geographical definition, patient covariates, and more. The analyses that were traditionally pursued have a limiting factor in the consideration of only static conditions. Instead, some of the CA determinants involve influences occurring at both temporal and spatial scales. The study of CA in the cancer context means choosing between HF, usually divided into general hospitals versus oncological centers (OCs). In the CA context, electronic health records (EHRs) promise to be a valuable source of information, one driving the next-generation patient-driven clinical decision support systems. Among the challenges, digital health requires the re-definition of a role of stochastic modeling to deal with emerging complexities from data heterogeneity. To model CA with cancer EHR, we have chosen a computational framework centered on a logistic model, as a reference, and on a multivariate statistical approach. We also provided a battery of tests for CA assessment. Our results indicate that a more refined CA model's structure yields superior discrimination power between health facilities. The increased significance was also visualized by comparative evaluations with ad hoc geo-localized maps. Notably, a cancer-specific spatial effect can be noticed, especially for breast cancer and through OCs. To mitigate the data distributional influences, bootstrap analysis was performed, and gains in some cancer-specific and spatially concentrated regions were obtained. Finally, when the temporal dynamics are assessed along a 3-year timeframe, negligible differential effects appear between predicted probabilities observed between standard critical values and bootstrapped values. In conclusion, for interpreting CA in terms of both spatial and temporal dynamics, sophisticated models are required. The one here proposed suggests that bootstrap can improve test accuracy. We recommend that evidences from stochastic modeling are merged with visual analytics, as this combination may be exploited by policy-makers in support to quantitative CA assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bootstrap; cancer patients; catchment area; multivariate adaptive regression splines; testing

Year:  2017        PMID: 29201863      PMCID: PMC5696335          DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Public Health        ISSN: 2296-2565


  16 in total

1.  Use of instrumental variables in electronic health record-driven models.

Authors:  Luca Salmasi; Enrico Capobianco
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  ESTIMATING PERSON-CENTERED TREATMENT (PeT) EFFECTS USING INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES: AN APPLICATION TO EVALUATING PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENTS.

Authors:  Anirban Basu
Journal:  J Appl Econ (Chichester Engl)       Date:  2014 June/July

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Appropriate measures of hospital market areas.

Authors:  D W Garnick; H S Luft; J C Robinson; J Tetreault
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  The Population Burden of Cancer: Research Driven by the Catchment Area of a Cancer Center.

Authors:  Caroline G Tai; Robert A Hiatt
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Determining health-care facility catchment areas in Uganda using data on malaria-related visits.

Authors:  Kate Zinszer; Katia Charland; Ruth Kigozi; Grant Dorsey; Moses R Kamya; David L Buckeridge
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Optimizing the two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility to medical clinics in Montreal.

Authors:  André Ngamini Ngui; Philippe Apparicio
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Location-allocation and accessibility models for improving the spatial planning of public health services.

Authors:  Gina Polo; C Mera Acosta; Fernando Ferreira; Ricardo Augusto Dias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A cancer geography paradox? Poorer cancer outcomes with longer travelling times to healthcare facilities despite prompter diagnosis and treatment: a data-linkage study.

Authors:  Melanie Turner; Shona Fielding; Yuhan Ong; Chris Dibben; Zhiqianq Feng; David H Brewster; Corri Black; Amanda Lee; Peter Murchie
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Geographical distribution of patients visiting a health information exchange in New York City.

Authors:  Arit Onyile; Sandip R Vaidya; Gilad Kuperman; Jason S Shapiro
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Ewing's Sarcoma.

Authors:  Wenle Li; Qian Zhou; Wencai Liu; Chan Xu; Zhi-Ri Tang; Shengtao Dong; Haosheng Wang; Wanying Li; Kai Zhang; Rong Li; Wenshi Zhang; Zhaohui Hu; Su Shibin; Qiang Liu; Sirui Kuang; Chengliang Yin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.