| Literature DB >> 29201291 |
Kyung Soon Park1, Kyu Jin Cho1, Hong Yeol Yang1, Kamolhuja Eshnazarovich Eshnazarov2, Taek Rim Yoon1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a previous study, we reported clinical and radiographic results of our modified Salter innominate osteotomy technique in 16 hips affected by Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD) with an average follow-up of 31.8 months. In this study, we present the long-term results of the osteotomy in LCPD patients followed until physeal closure.Entities:
Keywords: Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease; Long-term result; Osteotomy
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29201291 PMCID: PMC5705297 DOI: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Surg ISSN: 2005-291X
Demographic Characteristics of the Patients
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
| No. of hips | 30 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 24 |
| Female | 5 |
| Mean age at surgery (yr) | 7.1 (4.3–11.0) |
| Mean follow-up duration (yr) | 12.9 (9.1–16.0) |
| Catterall classification | |
| III | 11 |
| IV | 19 |
| Herring lateral pillar classification | |
| A | 4 |
| B | 10 |
| C | 16 |
| Leg length discrepancy (cm) | 0.7 (0.2–1.7) |
| Preoperative mean range of motion (°) | |
| Flexion | 112.0 (80–120) |
| Internal rotation | 18.9 (0–60) |
| External rotation | 35.4 (15–65) |
| Abduction | 29.6 (5–50) |
| Adduction | 20.5 (5–30) |
Values are presented as mean (range).
Functional Results (HHS and WOMAC Score)
| Outcome | Preoperative | Last follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| HHS | |||
| Pain | 36.13 ± 7.66 | 41.71 ± 1.19 | 0.006 |
| Function | 40.36 ± 3.05 | 45.46 ± 1.58 | 0.001 |
| Deformity | 0 | 4.00 ± 0.00 | 0.001 |
| ROM | 3.66 ± 0.46 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 0.001 |
| Total | 80.15 ± 7.71 | 96.17 ± 3.06 | 0.001 |
| WOMAC | |||
| Pain | 1.21 ± 1.63 | 0 | 0.024 |
| Stiffness | 0.86 ± 1.17 | 0 | 0.024 |
| Function | 2.93 ± 2.16 | 0.06 ± 0.27 | 0.001 |
| Total | 5.00 ± 3.37 | 0.06 ± 0.27 | 0.001 |
HHS: Harris Hip Score, WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, SD: standard deviation, ROM: range of motion.
Results of Other Common Hip Positions in Asian People
| Hip position | Preoperative | Last follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Squatting | 0.71 ± 0.61 | 0.29 ± 0.47 | 0.094 |
| Sitting on the floor | 0.14 ± 0.36 | 0 | 0.541 |
| Buddhist position | 0.86 ± 0.66 | 0.14 ± 0.36 | 0.007 |
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Fig. 1Case number 22. (A) Preoperative radiograph of an 8.5-year-old male showing Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease with a Wiberg's center-edge angle of 14°. (B) Radiograph taken immediately after surgery. (C) Radiograph taken 2 years after surgery. (D) Radiograph taken 15.9 years after surgery, showing good remodeling of the acetabular osteotomy site and good femoral head sphericity.
Radiologic Results and Outcome
| Case | Sex | Preoperative classification | Age at op (yr) | Follow-up duration (yr) | Age at last follow-up (yr) | CE angle (°) | Last follow-up | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catterall | Herring | Preop | Postop | Mose method | Stulberg classification | |||||
| 1 | Male | III | C | 4.3 | 13.9 | 18.2 | 20 | 36 | Good | I |
| 2 | Male | III | A | 8.3 | 15.0 | 23.3 | 30 | 33 | Fair | III |
| 3 | Male | IV | B | 7.4 | 13.3 | 20.7 | 20 | 28 | Good | II |
| 4 | Male | IV | A | 6.4 | 12.7 | 19.1 | 20 | 23 | Poor | IV |
| 5 | Male | IV | B | 6.4 | 14.4 | 20.8 | 23 | 30 | Poor | IV |
| 6 | Male | III | C | 8.5 | 13.2 | 21.7 | 19 | 28 | Good | I |
| 7 | Male | IV | B | 7.6 | 9.1 | 16.7 | 24 | 25 | Fair | III |
| 8 | Male | III | A | 5.5 | 11.5 | 17.0 | 18 | 31 | Good | I |
| 9 | Male | IV | B | 8.9 | 10.0 | 18.9 | 28 | 34 | Fair | III |
| 10 | Male | IV | C | 7.6 | 15.9 | 23.5 | 29 | 35 | Poor | III |
| 11 | Male | IV | C | 8.1 | 15.2 | 23.3 | 17 | 35 | Poor | III |
| 12 | Female | III | A | 8.1 | 14.2 | 22.3 | 21 | 31 | Good | III |
| 13 | Female | IV | C | 5.4 | 13.2 | 18.6 | 20 | 32 | Poor | IV |
| 14 | Male | IV | C | 5.9 | 12.5 | 18.4 | 20 | 20 | Fair | III |
| 15 | Female | III | B | 6.7 | 12.6 | 19.3 | 20 | 30 | Good | I |
| 16 | Female | IV | B | 4.7 | 10.9 | 15.6 | 18 | 28 | Good | II |
| 17 | Male | IV | C | 6.4 | 12.7 | 19.1 | 26 | 37 | Good | I |
| 18 | Male | III | B | 11.0 | 9.8 | 20.8 | 22 | 26 | Poor | IV |
| 19 | Female | IV | C | 6.4 | 12.1 | 18.5 | 6 | 28 | Good | II |
| 20 | Male | IV | C | 6.8 | 15.2 | 22.0 | 20 | 36 | Good | I |
| 21 | Male | IV | C | 4.7 | 16.0 | 20.7 | 5 | 20 | Good | II |
| 22 | Male | IV | C | 8.5 | 15.9 | 24.4 | 14 | 38 | Good | I |
| 23 | Male | IV | C | 6.7 | 12.7 | 19.4 | 15 | 29 | Fair | III |
| 24 | Male | III | C | 8.2 | 11.2 | 19.4 | 18 | 24 | Fair | II |
| 25 | Male | III | B | 8.5 | 13.9 | 22.4 | 12 | 29 | Good | I |
| 26 | Male | III | B | 7.1 | 15.3 | 22.4 | 23 | 23 | Good | II |
| 27 | Male | IV | C | 6.6 | 14.1 | 20.7 | 18 | 28 | Good | II |
| 28 | Male | IV | C | 7.4 | 9.3 | 16.7 | 21 | 27 | Good | I |
| 29 | Male | III | B | 6.8 | 12.1 | 18.9 | 22 | 26 | Good | II |
| 30 | Male | IV | C | 8.2 | 10.1 | 18.3 | 21 | 28 | Good | II |
op: operation, CE: center-edge, Preop: preoperative, Postop: postoperative.
Analysis of Stulberg Classification According to Age and Lateral Pillar Classification
| Variable | Stulberg classification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | ||
| Age (yr) | 0.438 | ||||
| < 8 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 3 | |
| ≥ 8 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |
| Lateral pillar classification | 0.490 | ||||
| A & B | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | |
| C | 6 | 6 | 3 | 1 | |
Other Authors' Results of Salter Innominate Osteotomy for Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease
| Study | No. of of hips | Follow-up duration (yr) | Catterall classification | Mose method | Stulberg classification | CE angle (°) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| II | III | IV | Good | Fair | Poor | I | II | III | IV | V | Preoperative | Postoperative | |||
| Kitakoji et al. | 30 | 18.2 | 2 (7) | 19 (63) | 9 (30) | - | - | - | 7 (23) | 12 (40) | 6 (20) | 5 (17) | 0 | - | - |
| Moberg et al. | 18 | - | 0 | 16 (89) | 2 (11) | 12 (67) | 2 (11) | 4 (22) | - | - | - | - | - | 16.9 | 29 |
| Ingman et al. | 38 | 13 | 3 (8) | 18 (47) | 17 (45) | 14 (37) | 15 (39) | 9 (24) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ishida et al. | 37 | 13 | 0 | 27 (73) | 10 (27) | 16 (43) | 0 | 21 (57) | 11 (30) | 5 (13) | 13 (35) | 8 (22) | 0 | 17.89 | 35.18 |
| Sponseller et al. | 49 | 9 | 0 | 28 (57) | 21 (43) | - | - | - | 7 (14) | 27 (55) | 13 (27) | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 22 | 35 |
| Present study | 30 | 12.9 | 0 | 11 (37) | 19 (63) | 18 (60) | 6 (20) | 6 (20) | 9 (30) | 9 (30) | 8 (27) | 4 (13) | 0 | 19.7 | 29.6 |
Values are presented as number (%).
CE: center-edge, -: not mentioned.