| Literature DB >> 29200658 |
Eric A Grulke1, Kazuhiro Yamamoto2, Kazuhiro Kumagai2, Ines Häusler3, Werner Österle3, Erik Ortel3, Vasile-Dan Hodoroaba3, Scott C Brown4, Christopher Chan5, Jiwen Zheng6, Kenji Yamamoto7, Kouji Yashiki7, Nam Woong Song8, Young Heon Kim8, Aleksandr B Stefaniak9, D Schwegler-Berry9, Victoria A Coleman10, Åsa K Jämting10, Jan Herrmann10, Toru Arakawa11, Woodrow W Burchett12, Joshua W Lambert12, Arnold J Stromberg12.
Abstract
The primary crystallite size of titania powder relates to its properties in a number of applications. Transmission electron microscopy was used in this interlaboratory comparison (ILC) to measure primary crystallite size and shape distributions for a commercial aggregated titania powder. Data of four size descriptors and two shape descriptors were evaluated across nine laboratories. Data repeatability and reproducibility was evaluated by analysis of variance. One-third of the laboratory pairs had similar size descriptor data, but 83% of the pairs had similar aspect ratio data. Scale descriptor distributions were generally unimodal and were well-described by lognormal reference models. Shape descriptor distributions were multi-modal but data visualization plots demonstrated that the Weibull distribution was preferred to the normal distribution. For the equivalent circular diameter size descriptor, measurement uncertainties of the lognormal distribution scale and width parameters were 9.5% and 22%, respectively. For the aspect ratio shape descriptor, the measurement uncertainties of the Weibull distribution scale and width parameters were 7.0% and 26%, respectively. Both measurement uncertainty estimates and data visualizations should be used to analyze size and shape distributions of particles on the nanoscale.Entities:
Keywords: Measurement uncertainty; Shape distribution; Size distribution; TEM; Titania
Year: 2017 PMID: 29200658 PMCID: PMC5709820 DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2017.03.027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Powder Technol ISSN: 0921-8831 Impact factor: 4.833