Literature DB >> 29200372

Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in a Primary Intraseptal Injection: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.

Tera Bonar1, John Nusstein2, Al Reader3, Melissa Drum4, Sara Fowler5, Mike Beck6.   

Abstract

Additional studies are needed to evaluate intraseptal anesthesia in the mandibular first molar. The purpose of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of a primary intraseptal injection of articaine and lidocaine, administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) system, in asymptomatic mandibular first molars. Using a crossover design, 100 subjects randomly received intraseptal injections of 1.4 mL of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine, both with 1:100,000 epinephrine, at 2 separate appointments. Injections were given in the interdental papillae, mesial (0.7 mL) and distal (0.7 mL) to the first molar. An electric pulp tester was used to test for pulpal anesthesia. Pain of injection, postoperative pain, and pulse rate were also evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed. Anesthetic success rate for the mandibular first molar was 32% for articaine and 30% for lidocaine, with no statistically significant difference (p = .8689) between the two. No significant differences were found between formulations for pain of injection. The intraseptal injection did not cause a clinically meaningful increase in pulse rate. Postoperative pain decreased each day with no significant differences between formulations. In conclusion, a primary intraseptal injection does not achieve a high success rate of pulpal anesthesia in the mandibular first molar.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Articaine; Injection pain; Intraseptal anesthesia; Lidocaine; Postoperative pain; Pulse rate increase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29200372      PMCID: PMC5715303          DOI: 10.2344/anpr-64-04-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  17 in total

1.  Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.

Authors:  Jeffrey Berlin; John Nusstein; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel Weaver
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2005-03

Review 2.  Intraseptal anesthesia: a review of a relevant injection technique.

Authors:  Karl Woodmansey
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

3.  Intraseptal anesthesia in the general dental practice.

Authors:  M K Marin
Journal:  Compendium       Date:  1987-03

4.  An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain.

Authors:  M W Heft; S R Parker
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Effects of local anesthetics on pulpal blood flow in dogs.

Authors:  S Kim; L Edwall; H Trowbridge; S Chien
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  An audit of the use of intra-septal local anaesthesia in a dental practice in the South of England.

Authors:  Stephen M Doman
Journal:  Prim Dent Care       Date:  2011-04

7.  Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.

Authors:  David Farnsworth; P Emile Rossouw; Richard F Ceen; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic.

Authors:  S F Malamed; S Gagnon; D Leblanc
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Efficacy and safety of intraseptal and periodontal ligament anesthesia achieved by computer-controlled articaine + epinephrine delivery: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  Vladimir Biocanin; Bozidar Brkovic; Biljana Milicic; Dragica Stojic
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Anesthetic Success of an Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Supplemental Articaine Buccal Infiltration for Molars and Premolars in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.

Authors:  Sara Fowler; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; Mike Beck
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.171

View more
  4 in total

1.  Anesthetic efficacies of intrapapillary injection in comparison to inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular premolar extraction: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Duangkamon Wongpang; Anupong Makeudom; Thanapat Sastraruji; Sakornrat Khongkhunthian; Suttichai Krisanaprakornkit; Chayarop Supanchart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Anesthetic efficacies of buccal with palatal injection versus buccal with intra-septal injection in permanent maxillary first molars of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Peecharat Areenoo; Chanika Manmontri; Nattakan Chaipattanawan; Papimon Chompu-Inwai; Manop Khanijou; Thongnard Kumchai; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  How Successful is Supplemental Intraseptal and Buccal Infiltration Anaesthesia in the Mandibular Molars of Patients Undergoing Root Canal Treatment or Tooth Extraction?

Authors:  Giath Gazal; Rayan Bahabri; Albraa B Alolayan; Mahmod Alkayyal; Rahaf Al-Ghamdi; Ruwaa Salamah
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2020-03-31

4.  Does articaine, rather than prilocaine, increase the success rate of anaesthesia for extraction of maxillary teeth.

Authors:  Giath Gazal
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2020-05-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.