Literature DB >> 29199517

Determinants of variable resource use for multidisciplinary team meetings in cancer care.

Nathalie Alexandersson1, Linn Rosell1,2, Jessica Wihl1,3, Björn Ohlsson1,4, Katarina Steen Carlsson5, Mef Nilbert1,2,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) have developed into standard of care to provide expert opinion and to grant evidence-based recommendations on diagnostics and treatment of cancer. Though MDTMs are associated with a range of benefits, a growing number of cases, complex case discussion and an increasing number of participants raise questions on cost versus benefit. We aimed to determine cost of MDTMs and to define determinants hereof based on observations in Swedish cancer care.
METHODS: Data were collected through observations of 50 MDTMs and from questionnaire data from 206 health professionals that participated in these meetings.
RESULTS: The MDTMs lasted mean 0.88 h and managed mean 12.6 cases with mean 4.2 min per case. Participants were mean 8.2 physicians and 2.9 nurses/other health professionals. Besides the number of cases discussed, meeting duration was also influenced by cancer diagnosis, hospital type and use of video facilities. When preparatory work, participation and post-MDTM work were considered, physicians spent mean 4.1 h per meeting. The cost per case discussion was mean 212 (range 91-595) EUR and the cost per MDTM was mean 2675 (range 1439-4070) EUR.
CONCLUSIONS: We identify considerable variability in resource use for MDTMs in cancer care and demonstrate that 84% of the total cost is derived from physician time. The variability demonstrated underscores the need for regular and structured evaluations to ensure cost effective MDTM services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29199517     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1400682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  2 in total

1.  Benefits, barriers and opinions on multidisciplinary team meetings: a survey in Swedish cancer care.

Authors:  Linn Rosell; Nathalie Alexandersson; Oskar Hagberg; Mef Nilbert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 2.  Benefits and drawbacks of videoconferencing for collaborating multidisciplinary teams in regional oncology networks: a scoping review.

Authors:  Lidia S van Huizen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Sjoukje van der Werf; Kees Ahaus; Jan Ln Roodenburg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.