| Literature DB >> 29199267 |
Wen Liu1, Haiying Zhuang2, Dazhang Shao3, Liangliang Wang4, Miao Shi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the clinical application of high-frequency color Doppler ultrasonography (HFCDU) in the diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of Achilles tendon injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 68 patients with suspected Achilles tendon injury were examined by HFCDU. There were 42 Achilles tendon injury patients who underwent surgery, and they were randomly divided into a routine treatment group (n=21) and a rehabilitation group (n=21). HFCDU was performed at weeks 1, 3, 6, and 9, and months 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 after the operation. The thickness of the injured Achilles tendon, echo, blood flow, and tissue adhesion were compared to those of the uninjured side. RESULTS Of the 68 patients, 14 had normal ultrasound presentation with strong echo; 7 had laceration, presenting as swelling and decreased echo; 26 had partial tear, presenting as discontinued rupture with no or low echo; 19 had complete rupture, presenting as discontinued fibers with hypoechoic hemorrhage and hyperechoic fat tissue between ends; 1 had plantar tendon rupture and periapical hemorrhage; and 1 had acute Achilles tendonitis. The postoperative tendon thickness decreased over time, echo turned homogeneous, blood flow and adhesions decreased, and these results were consistent with clinical symptoms. Patient condition and ultrasound recovery were better in the rehabilitation group, and the diameter of the injured tendon increased compared with the uninjured side. CONCLUSIONS HFCDU can determine the types and extent of tendon injuries, and can help in the diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of Achilles tendon injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29199267 PMCID: PMC5728083 DOI: 10.12659/msm.904186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
The ultrasound evaluation of Achilles tendon in recovery.
| Score | Thickness (percentage) | Echo | Blood signal strips (amount) | Degree of adhesion (sliding distance (mm)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100% | Low, uneven | >5 | 0 |
| 1 | 90%–99% | Low, uneven | 3–5 | 0–1 |
| 2 | 80%–89% | High, uneven | 1–2 | 1–2 |
| 3 | <80% | High, even | 0 | >2 |
Figure 1Imaging features of Achilles tendon injury on HFCDU before surgery. (A) Normal Achilles tendon with clear fiber texture (arrow) of the right foot of a 27-year-old male. (B) Achilles tendon after contusion of the right foot of a 29-year-old male: swelling, thickening, reduced echo, and no significant fiber loss (arrow). (C) Partial tear of Achilles tendon of the left foot of a 50-year-old female: discontinued fiber, hypoechoic area, and irregular edges (thin arrow); swollen and contracted ends (thick arrow). (D) Discontinued Achilles tendon fibers and retracted tendon ends of the left foot of a 42-year-old female (thick arrow); hypoechoic hemorrhage and hyperechoic fat tissues between ends (thin arrow).
Ultrasound evaluations of Achilles tendon injury.
| Injury type | Number of cases | True positive | False positive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laceration | 8 | 7 | 1 |
| Partial tear | 25 | 23 | 2 |
| Rupture | 20 | 19 | 1 |
| Total | 53 | 49 | 4 |
Figure 2Imaging features of Achilles tendon injury on HFCDU after surgery. HFCDU was performed at week 1 (A), week 3 (B), week 6 (C), week 9 (D), month 3 (E), month 6 (F), month 9 (G), month 12 (H), and month 24 (I) after the operation in the left foot of a 31-year-old male. Representative ultrasound images are shown. Arrows indicate the echo and the blood signals.
Figure 3Secondary injury due to excessive exercise. The representative image of the right foot in a 33-year-old male is shown. Arrow refers to the continuously interrupted Achilles tendon fibers caused by the secondary injury and the irregular echo-free cracks.
The 1-year postoperative treatment efficacy between rehabilitation treatment group and routine treatment group.
| Excellent | Satisfactory | Bad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation treatment group (n=21) | 18 | 3 | 0 |
| Routine treatment group (n=21) | 11 | 8 | 2 |
| P value | 0.0522 | 0.2722 | 0.6480 |
The 1-year postoperative treatment efficacy between acute injury group and old injury group.
| Excellent | Satisfactory | Bad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute injury group (n=30) | 28 | 2 | 0 |
| Old injury group (n=12) | 1 | 9 | 2 |
| P value | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.0594 |
The postoperative ultrasound evaluations between rehabilitation treatment group and routine treatment group at different time points.
| Groups | Time | Excellent | Great | Good | Poor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation treatment group (n=21) | 1 week | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| 3 weeks | 0 | 0 | 1 | 20 | |
| 6 weeks | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 | |
| 9 weeks | 2 | 7 | 9 | 3 | |
| 3 months | 9 | 11 | 1 | 0 | |
| 6 months | 17 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 year | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Routine treatment group (n=21) | 1 week | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| 3 weeks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | |
| 6 weeks | 0 | 1 | 5 | 15 | |
| 9 weeks | 1 | 3 | 11 | 6 | |
| 3 months | 5 | 13 | 3 | 0 | |
| 6 months | 9 | 10 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1 year | 17 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Comparison of the anteroposterior diameter and the transverse diameter between the injured and the healthy Achilles tendon.
| The injured Achilles tendon (mm) | The healthy Achilles tendon (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The anteroposterior diameter | 14.7±3.6 | 6.2±0.8 | 26.26136 | 0.0001 |
| The transverse diameter | 28.2±4.5 | 15.3±2.4 | 31.82657 | 0.0001 |