Literature DB >> 29199119

Sitting patterns after relocation to activity-based offices: A controlled study of a natural intervention.

David M Hallman1, Svend Erik Mathiassen2, Helena Jahncke2.   

Abstract

This study determined the effect of relocating workers from traditional to activity-based offices on objectively measured sitting patterns. Office workers (n=493) from five office-sites within a large Swedish government agency were included in a controlled study of a natural intervention (2015-2017). At four sites, traditional offices were replaced by activity-based offices, while workers at one site with no relocation acted as controls. Sitting, standing and walking were measured objectively for 5-8days in a sub-sample (n=110) using accelerometry (Actigraph). Total sitting time (% of working time) and time spent in short (<5min), moderate (5-30min) and prolonged (>30min) uninterrupted periods in sitting were determined. Intervention effects were determined at 3- and 12-month follow-ups using linear mixed models adjusted for baseline age, gender and office type, and stratified by office-site (referencing controls). The relocation to activity-based offices did not result in an overall effect (across sites) on occupational sitting time (all p>0.05), while walking time had increased significantly by 1.4% of the working time at 12months compared with controls. Heterogeneous results were found across offices after 12months on total sitting time compared with controls (estimated change -18.3% time-1.4% time), prolonged sitting (change -18.3% to -3.8%), walking (change 0.5%-3.5%) and standing (change -1.4%-13.9%). In conclusion, relocation to activity-based offices had a limited overall effect on occupational sitting patterns in the studied organization, but differed considerably between office sites. Site-specific determinants of sitting behavior in activity-based offices need be identified.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Accelerometer; Flexible office; Longitudinal study; Physical activity; Sedentary

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29199119     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  7 in total

1.  Associations between the Objectively Measured Office Environment and Workplace Step Count and Sitting Time: Cross-Sectional Analyses from the Active Buildings Study.

Authors:  Abi Fisher; Marcella Ucci; Lee Smith; Alexia Sawyer; Richard Spinney; Marina Konstantatou; Alexi Marmot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health and fitness across occupational groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie A Prince; Cara G Elliott; Kyle Scott; Sarah Visintini; Jennifer L Reed
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.457

3.  Underlying Factors Explaining Physical Behaviors among Office Workers-An Exploratory Analysis.

Authors:  Viktoria Wahlström; David Olsson; Fredrik Öhberg; Tommy Olsson; Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The Impact of Activity Based Working (ABW) on Workplace Activity, Eating Behaviours, Productivity, and Satisfaction.

Authors:  Lauren Arundell; Bronwyn Sudholz; Megan Teychenne; Jo Salmon; Brooke Hayward; Genevieve N Healy; Anna Timperio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The effectiveness and complexity of interventions targeting sedentary behaviour across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicole E Blackburn; Jason J Wilson; Ilona I McMullan; Paolo Caserotti; Maria Giné-Garriga; Katharina Wirth; Laura Coll-Planas; Sergi Blancafort Alias; Marta Roqué; Manuela Deidda; Andrew T Kunzmann; Dhayana Dallmeier; Mark A Tully
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Implementing a Physical Activity Promoting Program in a Flex-Office: A Process Evaluation with a Mixed Methods Design.

Authors:  Viktoria Wahlström; Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund; Mette Harder; Lisbeth Slunga Järvholm; Therese Eskilsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  What Determines Step-Rate at Work? An Investigation of Factors at the Shift, Worker, Ward, and Nursing Home Levels in Eldercare.

Authors:  Matthew L Stevens; Kristina Karstad; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Leticia Bergamin Januario; Andreas Holtermann; David M Hallman
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.179

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.