Literature DB >> 29199061

Should Medicare Remove Total Knee Arthroplasty From Its Inpatient Only List? A Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not a Partial Knee Arthroplasty.

P Maxwell Courtney1, Mark I Froimson2, R Michael Meneghini3, Gwo-Chin Lee4, Craig J Della Valle5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have solicited comments to consider removing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Inpatient Only list, as it has done for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study is to determine whether Medicare-aged patients undergoing TKA had comparable outcomes to those undergoing UKA.
METHODS: We queried the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for all patients aged 65 years or older who underwent elective TKA or UKA from 2014 and 2015. Demographic variables, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), 30-day complication, and readmission rates were compared between UKA and TKA patients. A multivariate regression analysis was then performed to identify independent risk factors for complications and hospital LOS greater than 1 day.
RESULTS: Of the 50,487 patients in the study, there were 49,136 (97%) TKA patients and 1351 UKA patients (3%). Medicare-aged TKA patients had a longer mean LOS (2.97 vs 1.57 days, P < .001), had a higher complication rate (9% vs 3%, P < .001), and were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility (31% vs 9%, P < .001) than Medicare-aged UKA patients. When controlling for other variables, TKA patients were more likely to experience a complication (odds ratio, 2.562; P < .001) and require LOS >1 day (odds ratio, 14.679; P < .001) than UKA patients.
CONCLUSION: TKA procedure in the Medicare population is an independent risk factor for increased complications and LOS compared to UKA. Policymakers should use caution extrapolating UKA data to TKA patients and recognize the inherent disparities between the 2 procedures.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; health policy; outcomes; total knee arthroplasty; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29199061     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Financial impact of removal of total knee arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list for a physician-owned BPCI program.

Authors:  James M Rizkalla; Aamir A Bhimani; Kurt J Kitziger; Paul C Peters; Richard D Schubert; Brian P Gladnick
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-30

2.  Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah A Wilson; Rob Middleton; Simon G F Abram; Stephanie Smith; Abtin Alvand; William F Jackson; Nicholas Bottomley; Sally Hopewell; Andrew J Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-02-21

3.  Impact of Intrathecal Fentanyl on Hospital Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Neuraxial Anesthesia.

Authors:  McKayla Kelly; Justin Turcotte; Jacob Aja; James MacDonald; Paul King
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-14

4.  A Morphometric Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Can Reproduce Normal Knee Kinematics. An In Vitro Robotic Evaluation.

Authors:  Marc Bandi; Francesco Benazzo; Cécile Batailler; Iris Blatter; Eik Siggelkow; Sébastien Parratte
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-06-17

5.  Medicare coverage is an independent predictor of prolonged hospitalization after primary total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mohamad J Halawi; Andrew D Stone; Christian Gronbeck; Lawrence Savoy; Mark P Cote
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-10-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.