Literature DB >> 29198936

Reaching low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treatment targets in stable coronary artery disease: Determinants and prognostic impact.

Christophe Bauters1, Olivier Tricot2, Gilles Lemesle3, Thibaud Meurice4, Olivier Hennebert5, Michel Farnier6, Nicolas Lamblin7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction is an integral part of the management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). AIMS: To assess attainment of LDL-C goals during long-term treatment of patients with stable CAD, and to determine predictors of goal attainment and the prognostic impact of reaching LDL-C<70mg/dL (1.8mmol/L) in a real-life setting.
METHODS: Data were obtained for 4080 outpatients with stable CAD included in the multicentre CORONOR study. Five-year follow-up was achieved for 3991 (97.8%) patients.
RESULTS: At inclusion, a recent (<1 year) measurement of LDL-C was available in 3757 (92.1%) patients. LDL-C<70mg/dL was reached by 885 (23.6%) patients. Independent predictors of LDL-C<70mg/dL were diabetes mellitus, statin treatment, treatment with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, previous myocardial infarction and short time since last coronary event. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or coronary revascularization) during the 5-year follow-up was 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.58; P=0.004) for LDL-C≥70mg/dL versus<70mg/dL. When compared with patients with LDL-C<70mg/dL, the adjusted HRs for LDL-C 70-99mg/dL and ≥100mg/dL (2.6mmol/L) were 1.27 (95% CI: 1.05-1.55; P=0.016) and 1.38 (95% CI: 1.12-1.70; P=0.003), respectively. When LDL-C was used as a continuous variable, the adjusted HRs for increases of 10mg/dL (0.3mmol/L) and 1mmol/L were 1.05 (95% CI: 1.03-1.08) and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.10-1.33), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, only a minority of stable CAD patients had LDL-C<70mg/dL. The patients who reached their LDL-C goal had the lowest risk of cardiovascular events.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholesterol; Cholestérol; Coronary artery disease; Maladie coronaire; Prognosis; Pronostic; Prévention secondaire; Secondary prevention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29198936     DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 1875-2128            Impact factor:   2.340


  2 in total

1.  Short Communication: Comparison of Calculated Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Values in HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Men Using the Traditional Friedewald and the Novel Martin-Hopkins LDL-C Equations.

Authors:  Edward E Schneider; Sudipa Sarkar; Joseph B Margolick; Seth S Martin; Wendy S Post; Todd T Brown
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.205

2.  Ulmus macrocarpa Hance modulates lipid metabolism in hyperlipidemia via activation of AMPK pathway.

Authors:  Hye-Ju Han; Xinjie Song; Dhananjay Yadav; Mi Sun Hwang; Joo Hee Lee; Chang Hoon Lee; Tae Hee Kim; Jeong Jun Lee; Jungkee Kwon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.