Literature DB >> 29198929

Racial differences in the development of de-novo donor-specific antibodies and treated antibody-mediated rejection after heart transplantation.

Robert Townsend Cole1, Jonathan Gandhi2, Robert A Bray3, Howard M Gebel3, Michael Yin2, Nikolaz Shekiladze4, An Young2, Aubrey Grant2, Ian Mahoney2, S Raja Laskar5, Divya Gupta5, Kunal Bhatt5, Wendy Book5, Andrew Smith5, Duc Nguyen5, J David Vega5, Alanna A Morris5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in outcomes after heart transplantation, black recipients have worse survival compared with non-black recipients. The source of such disparate outcomes remains largely unknown. We hypothesize that a propensity to generate de-novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) and subsequent antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) may account for racial differences in sub-optimal outcomes after heart transplant. In this study we aimed to determine the role of dnDSA and AMR in racial disparities in post-transplant outcomes.
METHODS: This study was a single-center, retrospective analysis of 137 heart transplant recipients (81% male, 48% black) discharged from Emory University Hospital. Patients were classified as black vs non-black for the purpose of our analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between race and selected outcomes. The primary outcome was the development of dnDSA. Secondary outcomes included treated AMR and a composite of all-cause graft dysfunction or death.
RESULTS: After 3.7 years of follow-up, 39 (28.5%) patients developed dnDSA and 19 (13.8%) were treated for AMR. In multivariable models, black race was associated with a higher risk of developing dnDSA (hazard ratio [HR] 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 8.65, p = 0.003) and a higher risk of treated AMR (HR 4.86, 95% CI 1.26 to 18.72, p = 0.021) compared with non-black race. Black race was also associated with a higher risk of all-cause graft dysfunction or death in univariate analyses (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.30, p = 0.044). However, in a multivariable model incorporating dnDSA, black race was no longer a significant risk factor. Only dnDSA development was significantly associated with all-cause graft dysfunction or death (HR 4.85, 95% CI 1.89 to 12.44, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Black transplant recipients are at higher risk for the development of dnDSA and treated AMR, which may account for racial disparities in outcomes after heart transplantation.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibody mediated rejection; donor specific antibodies; heart transplantation; transplant disparity; transplant outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29198929     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   13.569


  4 in total

1.  Circulating microRNAs in cellular and antibody-mediated heart transplant rejection.

Authors:  Palak Shah; Sean Agbor-Enoh; Pramita Bagchi; Christopher R deFilippi; Angela Mercado; Gouqing Diao; Dave Jp Morales; Keyur B Shah; Samer S Najjar; Erika Feller; Steven Hsu; Maria E Rodrigo; Sabra C Lewsey; Moon Kyoo Jang; Charles Marboe; Gerald J Berry; Kiran K Khush; Hannah A Valantine
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 13.569

Review 2.  Disparities in heart and lung transplantation.

Authors:  Wayne Tsuang; Rola Khedraki; Eileen Hsich
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.269

3.  Cell-Free DNA to Detect Heart Allograft Acute Rejection.

Authors:  Sean Agbor-Enoh; Palak Shah; Ilker Tunc; Steven Hsu; Stuart Russell; Erika Feller; Keyur Shah; Maria E Rodrigo; Samer S Najjar; Hyesik Kong; Mehdi Pirooznia; Ulgen Fideli; Alfiya Bikineyeva; Argit Marishta; Kenneth Bhatti; Yanqin Yang; Cedric Mutebi; Kai Yu; Moon Kyoo Jang; Charles Marboe; Gerald J Berry; Hannah A Valantine
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Are the current evaluation tools for advanced therapies biased?

Authors:  Raymond C Givens
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.108

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.