| Literature DB >> 29198371 |
Catherine François1, Christine Segard2, Maryline Bouvier2, Martine Stefanski2, Christine Pannier2, Patricia Zawadzki2, Catherine Roussel2, Denise Hecquet2, Gilles Duverlie3, Etienne Brochot3, Sandrine Castelain3.
Abstract
This study compared the performance of 3 automated immunoassays, Architect® (Abbott), Immulite® (Siemens) and Liaison® (Diasorin), for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology. Ninety-one serum samples collected in Amiens University Hospital were analyzed for the presence of Viral Capsid Antigen (VCA) IgG and IgM and Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen (EBNA) IgG. The agreement between the 3 assays was calculated for each marker individually and for determination of the EBV profile, based on interpretation of the combination of these 3 EBV markers. Although similar results were obtained with Architect® and Liaison®, several discordant results were observed with Immulite®, particularly for EBNA IgG. A large number of EBNA IgG-positive results were observed, which interfered with interpretation of the EBV profile. In contrast, Immulite® performed similarly to the 2 other assays for detection of VCA IgM.Entities:
Keywords: Architect; EBV; Epstein–Barr virus; Immulite; Infectious mononucleosis; Liaison
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29198371 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.10.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0732-8893 Impact factor: 2.803