John Nyland1,2, Kirk Campbell3, Alaa Kalloub4,5, Eric J Strauss3, Katrina Kuban6, David N M Caborn4,5. 1. Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. jnyland@spalding.edu. 2. Athletic Training Program, Kosair Charities College of Health and Natural Sciences, Spalding University, 901 South 4th Street, Louisville, KY, 40203-2188, USA. jnyland@spalding.edu. 3. New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA. 4. Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA. 5. Shea Orthopedic Group, KentuckyOne Health, 201 Abraham Flexner Way, Louisville, KY, USA. 6. Athletic Training Program, Kosair Charities College of Health and Natural Sciences, Spalding University, 901 South 4th Street, Louisville, KY, 40203-2188, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tissue excision in the setting of a meniscal tear has been shown to dramatically increase peak contact stresses in the affected tibiofemoral joint compartment, leading to the development of degenerative changes and osteoarthritis. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The current in vitro study utilized a porcine model to evaluate the effectiveness of segmental medial meniscal grafting following partial meniscectomy. The study hypothesis was that the procedure would normalize medial tibofemoral joint compartment pressure magnitudes, areas, and locations relative to an intact meniscus. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Using pressure film, medial tibiofemoral joint compartment peak, and mean pressure magnitudes, peak pressure location and peak pressure area were determined using 12 potted, fresh frozen, porcine knee specimens. Data were collected at three different knee flexion angles (90°, 45°, and 0°) for three conditions: intact medial meniscus, following resection of the central third of the medial meniscus, and following segmental medial meniscal grafting. For each condition, the potted femur was positioned horizontally in a bench vise clamp, while a 20 pound (88.96 N) axial compression force was manually applied for a 60 s duration by the primary investigator through the base of the potted tibia using a digital force gauge. RESULTS: Loss of the central 1/3 of the medial meniscus resulted in significant increases in the mean and peak pressures of the medial tibiofemoral joint compartment and decreased peak pressure area. Segmental meniscal grafting of the central third defect closely recreated the contact pressures and loading areas of the native, intact medial meniscus. CONCLUSION: From a static, time zero biomechanical perspective, segmental medial meniscus grafting of a partially meniscectomized knee restored mean pressure, peak pressure, and mean peak contact pressure areas of the medial tibiofemoral joint compartment back to levels observed in the intact medial meniscus at different knee flexion angles. In-vivo analysis under dynamic conditions is necessary to verify the healing efficacy and ability of the healed segmental medial meniscal allograft to provide long-term knee joint homeostasis when confronted with dynamic shear, rotatory, and combined, higher magnitude physiologic loading forces.
BACKGROUND: Tissue excision in the setting of a meniscal tear has been shown to dramatically increase peak contact stresses in the affected tibiofemoral joint compartment, leading to the development of degenerative changes and osteoarthritis. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The current in vitro study utilized a porcine model to evaluate the effectiveness of segmental medial meniscal grafting following partial meniscectomy. The study hypothesis was that the procedure would normalize medial tibofemoral joint compartment pressure magnitudes, areas, and locations relative to an intact meniscus. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Using pressure film, medial tibiofemoral joint compartment peak, and mean pressure magnitudes, peak pressure location and peak pressure area were determined using 12 potted, fresh frozen, porcine knee specimens. Data were collected at three different knee flexion angles (90°, 45°, and 0°) for three conditions: intact medial meniscus, following resection of the central third of the medial meniscus, and following segmental medial meniscal grafting. For each condition, the potted femur was positioned horizontally in a bench vise clamp, while a 20 pound (88.96 N) axial compression force was manually applied for a 60 s duration by the primary investigator through the base of the potted tibia using a digital force gauge. RESULTS: Loss of the central 1/3 of the medial meniscus resulted in significant increases in the mean and peak pressures of the medial tibiofemoral joint compartment and decreased peak pressure area. Segmental meniscal grafting of the central third defect closely recreated the contact pressures and loading areas of the native, intact medial meniscus. CONCLUSION: From a static, time zero biomechanical perspective, segmental medial meniscus grafting of a partially meniscectomized knee restored mean pressure, peak pressure, and mean peak contact pressure areas of the medial tibiofemoral joint compartment back to levels observed in the intact medial meniscus at different knee flexion angles. In-vivo analysis under dynamic conditions is necessary to verify the healing efficacy and ability of the healed segmental medial meniscal allograft to provide long-term knee joint homeostasis when confronted with dynamic shear, rotatory, and combined, higher magnitude physiologic loading forces.