Literature DB >> 29198041

Ethical considerations on novel neuronal interfaces.

Kadircan H Keskinbora1, Kader Keskinbora2.   

Abstract

Wireless powered implants, each smaller than a grain of rice, have the potential to scan and stimulate brain cells. Further research may lead to next-generation brain-machine interfaces for controlling prosthetics, exoskeletons, and robots, as well as "electroceuticals" to treat disorders of the brain and body. In conditions that can be particularly alleviated with brain stimulation, the use of such mini devices may pose certain challenges. Health professionals are becoming increasingly more accountable in decision-making processes that have impacts on the life quality of individuals. It is possible to transmit such stimulation using remote control principles. Perhaps, the most important concern regarding the use of these devices termed as "neural dust" is represented by the possibility of controlling affection and other mental functions via waves reaching the brain using more advanced versions of such devices. This will not only violate the respect for authority principle of ethics, but also medical ethics, and may potentially lead to certain incidents of varying vehemence that may be considered illegal. Therefore, a sound knowledge and implementation of ethical principles is becoming a more important issue on the part of healthcare professionals. In both the ethical decision-making process and in ethical conflicts, it may be useful to re-appraise the principles of medical ethics. In this article, the ethical considerations of these devices are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical ethics; Nanotechnology; Neuroethics; Neuronal interfaces

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29198041     DOI: 10.1007/s10072-017-3209-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Sci        ISSN: 1590-1874            Impact factor:   3.307


  16 in total

1.  Brain chips: postpone the debate.

Authors:  R J White
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Memory enhancement: the progress and our fears.

Authors:  R Gerlai
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 3.  Neuroethics for the new millenium.

Authors:  Adina Roskies
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Implantable brain chips? Time for debate.

Authors:  G Q Maguire; E M McGee
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

5.  Integrated Control of Predatory Hunting by the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala.

Authors:  Wenfei Han; Luis A Tellez; Miguel J Rangel; Simone C Motta; Xiaobing Zhang; Isaac O Perez; Newton S Canteras; Sara J Shammah-Lagnado; Anthony N van den Pol; Ivan E de Araujo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  US brain project puts focus on ethics.

Authors:  Helen Shen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 8.  Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods.

Authors:  Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  A four-part working bibliography of neuroethics: part 3 - "second tradition neuroethics" - ethical issues in neuroscience.

Authors:  Amanda Martin; Kira Becker; Martina Darragh; James Giordano
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.464

Review 10.  Deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Joel S Perlmutter; Jonathan W Mink
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 12.449

View more
  4 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence and Ophthalmology

Authors:  Kadircan Keskinbora; Fatih Güven
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-05

2.  The Ethical and Responsible Development and Application of Advanced Brain Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Andrew David Maynard; Marissa Scragg
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Neuroethics for Fantasyland or for the Clinic? The Limitations of Speculative Ethics.

Authors:  Sven Ove Hansson
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.566

4.  A stakeholder meeting exploring the ethical perspectives of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery.

Authors:  Matthew Quinn; Daniel Gray; Ahmed Shalaby Bardan; Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati; John Sparrow; Christopher Liu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.903

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.