Literature DB >> 2919765

Anesthesia for cesarean section--effects on neonates.

B Y Ong1, M M Cohen, R J Palahniuk.   

Abstract

The effects of general and regional anesthesia on neonates after cesarean section have been studied mainly on elective cases. In this paper we studied infants delivered by elective and nonelective cesarean section at the Winnipeg Women's Hospital from 1975 to 1983 (n = 3940) to determine the effect of anesthetic technique on neonatal outcomes. A trained anesthesia nurse interviewed all parturients and reviewed their antepartum, labor and delivery, and anesthesia records. Assessments of neonatal outcomes were based on 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, need for positive pressure oxygen by mask or intubation, and neonatal deaths (within 30 days). These outcomes were determined in three subgroups of neonates delivered by cesarean section: those delivered by elective section, those delivered by urgent cesarean section for dystocia or failure of labor to progress, and those delivered by section because of fetal distress. Overall, 12.5% of the infants had 1-minute Apgar scores of 4 or less, and 1.4% had 5-minute Apgar scores of 4 or less. Neonates born to mothers given general anesthesia had worse outcomes than those born to mothers given regional anesthesia. Among neonates delivered after elective section, general anesthesia was associated with a higher incidence of low Apgar scores at 1 minute. In neonates delivered by nonelective section, general anesthesia was associated with higher rates of low Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes as well as greater requirements for intubation and artificial ventilation. There were no differences seen in neonatal death rates with general and regional anesthesia in the three groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2919765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  8 in total

1.  The outcome of preterm neonates with intraventricular hemorrhage delivered with intravenous meperidine or epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Shmuel Evron; Tiberiu Ezri; Nugzar Rigini; Andre Gomel; Peter Szmuk; Oscar Sadan; David Kohelet
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Epidural analgesia in obstetrics.

Authors:  F Reynolds
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-09-23

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of general anaesthesia in pregnancy.

Authors:  T Gin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Management of foetal asphyxia by intrauterine foetal resuscitation.

Authors:  S Velayudhareddy; H Kirankumar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-09

5.  Evaluation of timings and outcomes in category-one caesarean sections: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Clare Newton Dunn; Qianpian Zhang; Josh Tjunrong Sia; Pryseley Nkouibert Assam; Shephali Tagore; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-08

6.  Factors associated with post-cesarean stillbirth in 12 hospitals in Benin: a cross-sectional.

Authors:  Virginie Mongbo; Edgard-Marius Ouendo; Victoire Agueh; Alphonse Kpozèhouen; Ghislain Sopoh; Jacques Saïzonou; Isabelle Godin
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-10-26

Review 7.  The Current Role of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Laurence Ring; Ruth Landau; Carlos Delgado
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2021-02-24

8.  Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study.

Authors:  Charles S Algert; Jennifer R Bowen; Warwick B Giles; Greg E Knoblanche; Samantha J Lain; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 8.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.