| Literature DB >> 29197331 |
Kennedy Kwasi Addo1, Samuel Ofori Addo2,3, Gloria Ivy Mensah2, Lydia Mosi3,4, Frank Adae Bonsu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and Non-tuberculosis Mycobacterium (NTM) infections differ clinically, making rapid identification and drug susceptibility testing (DST) very critical for infection control and drug therapy. This study aims to use World Health Organization (WHO) approved line probe assay (LPA) to differentiate mycobacterial isolates obtained from tuberculosis (TB) prevalence survey in Ghana and to determine their drug resistance patterns.Entities:
Keywords: Drug resistance; Ghana; Line probe assay; MTBDRplus; NTM-DR; Prevalence survey; Tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29197331 PMCID: PMC5712140 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2853-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Characteristics of participants from whom mycobacterial isolates used in the study were obtained (N = 361)
| Characteristic | MTBC |
| NTM |
| Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 91 (55.2) | 0.0001 | 68 (34.7) | 159 (44.0) | |
| Female | 74 (44.8) | 128 (65.3) | 0.0001 | 202 (56.0) | |
| Age group | |||||
| 15–24 | 25 (15.2) | 33 (16.8) | 58 (16.1) | ||
| 25–34 | 22 (13.3) | 35 (17.9) | 57 (15.8) | ||
| 35–44 | 22 (13.3) | 31 (15.8) | 53 (14.7) | ||
| 45–54 | 31 (18.8) | 22 (11.2) | 53 (14.7) | ||
| 55–64 | 23 (13.9) | 20 (10.2) | 43 (11.9) | ||
| 65+ | 42 (25.5) | 0.63 | 55 (28.1) | 0.63 | 97 (26.8) |
| TB Historya | |||||
| Yes | 6 (3.6) | 0 (0) | 6 (1.7) | ||
| No | 159 (96.4) | 196 (100) | 355(98.3) | ||
MTBC Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, NTM Non-tuberculous mycobacterium
aParticipants who have been diagnosed with TB and treated prior to the prevalence survey
Frequency of MTBC species differentiated by GenoType MTBC Assay (N = 165)
| MTBC species | Number | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 161 | 97.6 |
|
| 4 | 2.4 |
|
| 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 0 | 0.0 |
MTBC Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M. tuberculosis Mycobacterium tuberculosis, M. africanum Mycobacterium africanum, M. bovis Mycobacterium bovis, M. microti Mycobacterium microti
Fig. 1Drug resistance patterns of MTBC isolates (N = 165). Susceptible: isolates that are susceptible to both isoniazid and rifampicin. Resistant: isolates that are resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampicin. Indeterminate: isolate whose resistance profile to isoniazid or rifampicin could not be determined by the GenoType MTBDRplus
Specific gene mutations in resistant strains
| Gene locus | Band | Gene region/mutation | aRIF monoresistant | bINH monoresistant | cMDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| WT1 | 506–509 | ||||
| WT2 | 510–513 | ||||
| WT3 | 513–517 | d1 | |||
| WT4 | 516–519 | ||||
| WT5 | 518–522 | ||||
| WT6 | 521–525 | ||||
| WT7 | 526–529 | d3 | |||
| WT8 | 530–533 | 1 | 1 | ||
| MUT1 | D516V | 6 | |||
| MUT2A | H526Y | d3 | |||
| MUT2B | H526D | ||||
| MUT3 | S531 L | 1 | 1 | ||
|
| |||||
| WT | 315 | d11 | d4 | ||
| MUT1 | S315 T1 | 14 | 10 | ||
| MUT2 | S315 T2 | ||||
|
| |||||
| WT1 | −15/−16 | d4 | d1 | ||
| WT2 | −8 | d1 | |||
| MUT1 | C15T | d4 | d1 | ||
| MUT2 | A16G | ||||
| MUT3A | T8C | 6 | |||
| MUT3B | T8A |
WT wild type band, MUT mutant band, RIF rifampicin, INH isoniazid, MDR multi-drug resistance
aIsolates with mutation(s) in the rpoB gene and none in the inhApro or katG gene
bIsolates with mutation(s) in the inhApro region and/or in the katG gene, with no mutation in the rpoB gene
cIsolates with mutations in the rpoB gene and inhApro and/or katG gene
dNumber of isolates that had presence of mutation band and the absence of corresponding wild type band
Fig. 2Identification of species among suspected NTM isolates. M. fortuitum = Mycobacterium fortuitum; M. mageritense = Mycobacterium mageritense; M. abscessus = Mycobacterium abscessus; M. perigrinum = Mycobacterium perigrinum; M. smegmatis = Mycobacterium smegmatis; M. intracellulare = Mycobacterium intracellulare; M. chimaera = Mycobacterium chimaera; M. gordonae = Mycobacterium gordonae; M. lentiflavum = Mycobacterium lentiflavum; M. scrofulaceum = Mycobacterium scrofulaceum; M. asiaticum = Mycobacterium asiaticum; M. goodii = Mycobacterium goodii; M. interjectum = Mycobacterium interjectum; M. avium = Mycobacterium avium; N = number of isolates tested. *Mycobacterium species that could not be identified to the species level. †Members of a group of gram-positive bacterium with high guanine and cytosine content. ‡Group of bacteria that were neither mycobacteria nor high G + C gram-positive bacteria according to assay kit manufacturer’s instructions
Gene mutations in NTM species
| Species/Subspecies | erm(41)a | rrld | rrse | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C28b | T28c | WT | MUT | WT | MUT | |
|
| 1 | 1 | ||||
|
| 26 | 26 | ||||
|
| 1 | 1 | ||||
|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
|
| 6 | 6 | 6 | |||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Note: The probes erm(41) C28 and erm(41) T28 are only relevant for M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and M. abscessus subsp. bolletii, but not for M. abscessus subsp. massiliense. Due to deletions in the erm(41) gene of M. abscessus subsp. massiliense the gene is nonfunctional, leading to macrolide sensitivity in spite of a developed erm(41) T28 band (except for strains with an additional rrl mutation)
WT wild type probe comprises the most important resistance region of the rrl and rrs genes, MUT mutation probes detect the most common resistance-mediating mutations in rrl and rrs genes
aThe erm(41) gene is examined for detection of resistance to macrolides (Clarithromycin or azithromycin) and is only present in members of the M. abscessus complex
bThe erm(41) C28 probe detects a genotype that carries a C at position 28 of the erm(41) gene. When the erm(41) C28 probe stains positive, this indicates that the tested strain is sensitive to macrolides (except for strains with an additional rrl mutation)
cThe erm(41) T28 probe detects a genotype that carries a T instead of a C at position 28 of the erm(41) gene. When the erm(41) T28 probe stains positive, this indicates that the tested strain is resistant to macrolides
dThe rrl gene is examined for detection of resistance to macrolides (clarithromycin or azithromycin)
eThe rrs gene is examined for detection of resistance to aminoglycosides (kanamycin, amikacin, gentamicin)