Christoph Schabel1,2, Daniele Marin3, Dominik Ketelsen4, Alfredo E Farjat5, Georg Bier6, Mario Lescan7, Fabian Bamberg4, Konstantin Nikolaou4, Malte N Bongers4. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. chschabel@gmx.de. 2. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. chschabel@gmx.de. 3. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. 5. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 6. Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. 7. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare a low-dose, tin-filtered, nonenhanced, high-pitch Sn100 kVp CT protocol (Sn100) with a standard protocol (STP) for the detection of calcifications in the ascending aorta in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval for this retrospective study was waived and the study was HIPAA-compliant. The study included 192 patients (128 men; age 68.8 ± 9.9 years), of whom 87 received the STP and 105 the Sn100 protocol. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) and radiation doses were obtained using dose monitoring software. Two blinded readers evaluated image quality on a scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high) and the extent of calcifications of the ascending aorta on a scale from 0 (none) to 10 (high), subdivided into 12 anatomic segments. RESULTS: The Sn100 protocol achieved a mean SSDE of only 0.5 ± 0.1 mGy and 0.20 ± 0.04 mSv compared with the mean SSDE of 5.4 ± 2.2 mGy achieved with the STP protocol (p < 0.0001). Calcification burden was associated with age (p < 0.0001), but was independent of protocol with mean calcification scores of 0.48 ± 1.23 (STP) and 0.55 ± 1.25 (Sn100, p = 0.18). Reader agreement was very good (STP κ = 0.87 ± 0.02, Sn100 κ = 0.88 ± 0.01). The STP protocol provided a higher subjective image quality than the Sn100 protocol: STP median 4, interquartile range 4-5, vs. SN100 3, 3-4; p < 0.0001) and a slightly better depiction of calcification (STP 5, 4-5, vs. Sn100 4, 4-5; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The optimized Sn100 protocol achieved a mean SSDE of only 0.5 ± 0.1 mGy while the depiction of calcifications remained good, and there was no systematic difference in calcification burden between the two protocols. KEY POINTS: • Tin-filtered, low-dose CT can be used to assess aortic calcifications before cardiac surgery • An optimized Sn100 protocol achieved a mean SSDE of only 0.5 ± 0.1 mGy • The depiction of atherosclerosis of the thoracic aorta was similar with both protocols • The depiction of relevant thoracic pathologies before cardiac surgery was similar with both protocols.
OBJECTIVES: To compare a low-dose, tin-filtered, nonenhanced, high-pitch Sn100 kVp CT protocol (Sn100) with a standard protocol (STP) for the detection of calcifications in the ascending aorta in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval for this retrospective study was waived and the study was HIPAA-compliant. The study included 192 patients (128 men; age 68.8 ± 9.9 years), of whom 87 received the STP and 105 the Sn100 protocol. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) and radiation doses were obtained using dose monitoring software. Two blinded readers evaluated image quality on a scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high) and the extent of calcifications of the ascending aorta on a scale from 0 (none) to 10 (high), subdivided into 12 anatomic segments. RESULTS: The Sn100 protocol achieved a mean SSDE of only 0.5 ± 0.1 mGy and 0.20 ± 0.04 mSv compared with the mean SSDE of 5.4 ± 2.2 mGy achieved with the STP protocol (p < 0.0001). Calcification burden was associated with age (p < 0.0001), but was independent of protocol with mean calcification scores of 0.48 ± 1.23 (STP) and 0.55 ± 1.25 (Sn100, p = 0.18). Reader agreement was very good (STP κ = 0.87 ± 0.02, Sn100 κ = 0.88 ± 0.01). The STP protocol provided a higher subjective image quality than the Sn100 protocol: STP median 4, interquartile range 4-5, vs. SN100 3, 3-4; p < 0.0001) and a slightly better depiction of calcification (STP 5, 4-5, vs. Sn100 4, 4-5; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The optimized Sn100 protocol achieved a mean SSDE of only 0.5 ± 0.1 mGy while the depiction of calcifications remained good, and there was no systematic difference in calcification burden between the two protocols. KEY POINTS: • Tin-filtered, low-dose CT can be used to assess aortic calcifications before cardiac surgery • An optimized Sn100 protocol achieved a mean SSDE of only 0.5 ± 0.1 mGy • The depiction of atherosclerosis of the thoracic aorta was similar with both protocols • The depiction of relevant thoracic pathologies before cardiac surgery was similar with both protocols.
Authors: F Roques; S A Nashef; P Michel; E Gauducheau; C de Vincentiis; E Baudet; J Cortina; M David; A Faichney; F Gabrielle; E Gams; A Harjula; M T Jones; P P Pintor; R Salamon; L Thulin Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: C I Blauth; D M Cosgrove; B W Webb; N B Ratliff; M Boylan; M R Piedmonte; B W Lytle; F D Loop Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1992-06 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jeffrey P Gold; Kaila E Torres; William Maldarelli; Ilya Zhuravlev; Douglas Condit; John Wasnick Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Annemarie M den Harder; Linda M de Heer; Ronald C A Meijer; Marco Das; Gabriel P Krestin; Jos G Maessen; Ad J J C Bogers; Pim A de Jong; Tim Leiner; Ricardo P J Budde Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 3.528