| Literature DB >> 29196735 |
Sean P Ogilvie1, Matthew J Large2, Giuseppe Fratta2, Manuela Meloni2, Ruben Canton-Vitoria3, Nikos Tagmatarchis3, Florian Massuyeau4, Christopher P Ewels4, Alice A K King2, Alan B Dalton5.
Abstract
N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) has been shown to be the most effective solvent for liquid phase exfoliation and dispersion of a range of 2D materials including graphene, molybdenum disulphide (MoS2) and black phosphorus. However, NMP is also known to be susceptible to sonochemical degradation during exfoliation. We report that this degradation gives rise to strong visible photoluminescence of NMP. Sonochemical modification is shown to influence exfoliation of layered materials in NMP and the optical absorbance of the solvent in the dispersion. The emerging optical properties of the degraded solvent present challenges for spectroscopy of nanomaterial dispersions; most notably the possibility of observing solvent photoluminescence in the spectra of 2D materials such as MoS2, highlighting the need for stable solvents and exfoliation processes to minimise the influence of solvent degradation on the properties of liquid-exfoliated 2D materials.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29196735 PMCID: PMC5711948 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17123-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) UV-visible absorption spectra of NMP showing absorbance below 450 nm increasing with the age of the NMP, from NMP-1 to NMP-9. Inset: Photographs of NMP-1, NMP-4 and NMP-9 exhibiting strong blue-green photoluminescence under illumination with 405 nm laser pointer. (B) UV-visible absorption spectra for as-received NMP and sonicated NMP(s). (C) Raman spectra showing vibrational modes of NMP with no clear differences between as-received NMP and sonicated NMP(s). (D) 1H NMR spectra showing proton environments in NMP additional to those of the unmodified molecule with features corresponding to alkenyl species at a chemical shift of 5 ppm at around 0.1% by number relative to the unmodified NMP molecules, which increase in intensity from the as-received to the sonicated NMP(s).
Figure 2Photoluminescence excitation maps for (A) NMP and (B) NMP(s). PL spectra for peak emission with λexc = 325 nm for (C) NMP and (D) NMP(s), showing two component fitting with features at around 380 nm and 440 nm, the latter of which dominates PL emission in the NMP(s). Note the presence of an instrument-broadened Raman feature at 358 nm (~2900 cm−1), which has been excluded from the peak fitting. Time-resolved PL measurements of (E) NMP and (F) NMP(s) for emission at 400 nm under excitation at 336 nm, fitted as the sum of exponential components, whose time constants are shown inset, with increased lifetimes and an additional component present in NMP(s).
Figure 3UV-visible absorption spectra for (A) graphene and (B) MoS2 exfoliated into NMP and NMP(s), showing significant increase in concentration for graphene exfoliated into NMP(s) and decrease in concentration for MoS2 exfoliated into NMP(s), compared with as-received NMP. (C) PL spectra for MoS2 showing PL of NMP considerably more prominent than, and overlapping with, PL of MoS2. Inset: expanded view of the same spectrum showing A and B exciton PL of MoS2. (D) PL spectrum of MoS2 after centrifugation and redispersion into surfactant and water, showing the absence of the broad background NMP PL.