| Literature DB >> 29196629 |
Francesca La Rosa1, Marina Saresella2, Francesca Baglio2, Federica Piancone2, Ivana Marventano2, Elena Calabrese2, Raffaello Nemni2,3, Enrico Ripamonti2, Monia Cabinio2, Mario Clerici2,3.
Abstract
Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) conversion to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is seen in a sizable portion of aMCI patients; correlates predicting such conversion are poorly defined but neuroinflammation and the reactivation of chronic viral infections are suspected to play a role in this phenomenon. We analyzed these aspects in two homogeneous groups of aMCI who did or did not convert to AD over a 24-months period. Results showed that at baseline in those aMCI individuals who did not convert to AD: 1) Aβ1-42 stimulated production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL6 and IL1β by CD14+ cells was significantly reduced (p = 0.01), 2) CD14+/IL-33+ cells were increased (p = 0.0004); 3) MFI of TLR8 and TLR9 was significantly increased, and 4) better preserved hippocampus volumes were observed and correlated with IL33+/CD14+ cells. Notably, Aβ1-42 stimulated production of the antiviral cytokine IFN-λ was increased as well in non-AD converters, although with a borderline statistical significance (p = 0.05). Data herein indicating that proinflammatory cytokines are reduced, whereas IFN-λ production and TLR8 and 9 MFI are augmented in those aMCI in whom AD conversion is not observed suggest that the ability to mount stronger antiviral response within an antiiflammatory milieu associates with lack of AD conversion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29196629 PMCID: PMC5711836 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16754-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline of the individuals enrolled in the study who had a diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment and did (AD converters) or did not (AD non-converters) convert to AD over a 24-months period. Mini-Mental State Evaluation (MMSE) after follow up indicates the value 24 months after the baseline result.
| AD converters | AD non-converters | |
|---|---|---|
| Number (N) | 25 | 21 |
| Gender (M:F) | 14:11 | 12:9 |
| Age, years at baseline | 76 ± 5.6 | 72 ± 6.2 |
| Level of education, years | 8.25 ± 2.71 | 7.62 ± 3.62 |
| MMSE | 25 ± 1.9 | 26 ± 2.1 |
| MMSE after follow up | 20 ± 5.1* | 25 ± 2.2 |
| APOE ε-4 cariers (%) | 20 | 20 |
| L HV, mm3 | 2496 ± 560.2 | 3409.4 ± 402.5** |
| R HV, mm3 | 2633.5 ± 492.6 | 3413.6 ± 496.4*** |
*p = 0.003 between baseline and follow-up in AD-converters. **p = 0.04 at baseline between AD converters and AD non-converters. ***p = 0.01 at baseline between AD converters and AD non-converters. #Power 1 − β ≥ 0.90 considering MMSE score or Hippocampal Volume (HV).
Figure 1TLR8 and TLR9 expressing CD14+ cells: TLR8- (upper panels) and TLR9- (lower panels) expressing CD14+ cells upon stimulation with specific agonists (ODN and ssRNA, respectively). Representative results in MCI individuals who did (AD-converters) or did not (AD non-converters) convert to AD over a 24-months period are presented in the left part of the figure; in the upper right corner the percentage of CD14/TLR8+ and CD14/TLR9+ cells is shown. Summary results were obtained in 21 AD converters and 25 AD non-converters and are shown in the bar graphs. The boxes stretch from the 25 to the 75 percentile; the line across the boxes indicates the median values; the lines stretching from the boxes indicate extreme values. Outside values are displayed as separate points.
Agonist-stimulated TLR8 and TLR9 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) at baseline in CD14+ cells of patients with a diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment who did (AD converters) or did not (AD non-converters) progress to Alzheimer’s disease over a 24-months period. Median (M) and Interquartile range (IQR) are shown.
| AD converters | AD non-converters | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD14+/TLR8+ | 17.9 (16.6–19.1)a | 36 (22.7–38.3) |
|
| CD14+/TLR9+ | 23.9 (19.6–25.9)a | 43.3 (41.9–48.1) |
|
aTLR8 and TLR9 MFI calculated on MFI-positive cells alonen.
Figure 2Pro-and- anti-inflammatory cytokine mRNA expression and protein in stimulated cells: (A) Aβ1-42-stimulated IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-33 mRNA expression in MCI individuals who did (AD converters, N = 21) or did not (AD non-converters, N = 25) convert to AD over a 24-months period. Gene expression was calculated relative to GAPDH housekeeping gene. The expression of the genes is assessed by single real-time quantitative RT-PCR and shown as median of fold-change expression from the unstimulated samples. Summary results are shown in the bar graphs using TIGR Multi Experiment Viewer (MeV)v4.9. Aβ1-42-stimulated IL-1β and IL-6 production (B); IL-33 expressing CD14+ cells (%) (C), and IFN-λ production (D) in PBMC of MCI individuals who did (AD converters; N = 21) or did not (AD non-converters; N = 25) convert to AD over a 24-months period. The boxes stretch from the 25 to the 75 percentile; the line across the boxes indicates the median values; the lines stretching from the boxes indicate extreme values. Outside values are displayed as separate points. Statistical significance is shown.
Figure 3Brain mask of aMCI-typical Hippocampus-region and MRI analysis: an example of automatic hippocampal segmentation using the ADABoost algorithm. Coronal, axial and sagittal brain views in a single subject are shown in the upper part (A); left (LH) and right (RH) hyppocampal volumes as evaluated by MRI in MCI individuals who did (AD converters, N = 13) or did not (AD non-converters, N = 14) convert to AD over a 24-months period. The boxes stretch from the 25 to the 75 percentile; the line across the boxes indicates the median values; the lines stretching from the boxes indicate extreme values. Outside values are displayed as separate points. Statistical significance is shown (B).
Figure 4MRI analysis and correlations: Rank correlation between Aβ1-42 stimulated IL-33 producing CD14+ cells and the Left (L) and Right (R) hippocampus volume (HV) in MCI individuals who did (N = 13) or did not (N = 14) convert to AD. Statistical significance and Spearman’s coefficient of rank correlation (rho) are shown.