Literature DB >> 29196348

The value of the physical examination in clinical practice: an international survey.

Andrew T Elder1, I Chris McManus2, Alan Patrick3, Kichu Nair4, Louella Vaughan5, Jane Dacre6.   

Abstract

A structured online survey was used to establish the views of 2,684 practising clinicians of all ages in multiple countries about the value of the physical examination in the contemporary practice of internal medicine. 70% felt that physical examination was 'almost always valuable' in acute general medical referrals. 66% of trainees felt that they were never observed by a consultant when undertaking physical examination and 31% that consultants never demonstrated their use of the physical examination to them. Auscultation for pulmonary wheezes and crackles were the two signs most likely to be rated as frequently used and useful, with the character of the jugular venous waveform most likely to be rated as -infrequently used and not useful. Physicians in contemporary hospital general medical practice continue to value the contribution of the physical examination to assessment of outpatients and inpatients, but, in the opinion of trainees, teaching and demonstration could be improved. © Royal College of Physicians 2017. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bedside medicine; medical education; physical examination; physical signs

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29196348      PMCID: PMC6297700          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-6-490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  14 in total

1.  The adult screening physical examination: what physicians do.

Authors:  Troy Wildes; Ruric Anderson
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  2004

2.  The role of assessment in competency-based medical education.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Jonathan Sherbino; Donlin M Long; Susan R Swing; Jason R Frank
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Cardiac auscultation: a glorious past--and it does have a future!

Authors:  Morton E Tavel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Utility of clinical examination in the diagnosis of emergency department patients admitted to the department of medicine of an academic hospital.

Authors:  Liza Paley; Taiba Zornitzki; Joel Cohen; Joshua Friedman; Natalia Kozak; Ami Schattner
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-08-08

5.  Inadequacies of Physical Examination as a Cause of Medical Errors and Adverse Events: A Collection of Vignettes.

Authors:  Abraham Verghese; Blake Charlton; Jerome P Kassirer; Meghan Ramsey; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Physical examination education in graduate medical education--a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Somnath Mookherjee; Lara Pheatt; Sumant R Ranji; Calvin L Chou
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A core physical examination in internal medicine: what should students do and how about their supervisors?

Authors:  Catharina M Haring; Jos W M van der Meer; Cornelis T Postma
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 8.  Handheld ultrasound and diagnosis of cardiovascular disease at the bedside.

Authors:  Brandon Wiley; Bibhu Mohanty
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Moving toward cost-effectiveness in physical examination.

Authors:  Paul Bergl; Jeanne M Farnan; Evelyn Chan
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Junior doctor skill in the art of physical examination: a retrospective study of the medical admission note over four decades.

Authors:  Charlotte M Oliver; Selena A Hunter; Takayoshi Ikeda; Duncan C Galletly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  5 in total

1.  The hazards of neglecting the skin.

Authors:  Barry Monk
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Twenty-first century healthcare: delivering the promise against the reality.

Authors:  Ed Nicol
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study.

Authors:  Richard Wakeford; Kasia Ludka; Katherine Woolf; I C McManus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Neurological examination course in an interactive webinar as a solution during a pandemic. An overview of the implementation, optimization as well as critical considerations.

Authors:  C Oster; I Farhood; S Klebe; C Kleinschnitz; Lorenz Peters
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-28

5.  Can achievement at medical admission tests predict future performance in postgraduate clinical assessments? A UK-based national cohort study.

Authors:  Lewis W Paton; I C McManus; Kevin Yet Fong Cheung; Daniel Thomas Smith; Paul A Tiffin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.