Literature DB >> 29196071

Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Office Setting: Real-world Experience of Over 100 Patients.

Evan R Sirls1, Kim A Killinger2, Judith A Boura3, Kenneth M Peters3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes and compliance with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) for overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms.
METHODS: Adults who had PTNS from June 30, 2011, to October 8, 2015, were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, copay, travel distance, employment status, history, symptoms, and treatments used before, during, and after PTNS. Pearson chi-square test, Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon rank and paired t test were performed.
RESULTS: Of 113 patients (mean age 75 ± 12 years), most were women (65.5%), married (78.1%), and retired or unemployed (80.2%). The median distance to the clinic was 8.1 mi, and the median copay was $0. The most common indication for PTNS was nocturia (92.9%) followed by OAB with urgency urinary incontinence (75.2%) and urinary urgency and/or frequency (24.8%). Prior treatments included anticholinergics (75.2%), mirabegron (36.6%), behavioral modification (29.2%), pelvic floor physical therapy (18.6%), and others (19.5%). Patients completed a mean of 10.5 ± 3 of 12 planned weekly PTNS treatments. Of 105 patients, 40 (38.1%) used concomitant treatments (most commonly anticholinergics). Of 87 patients, 62 (71.3%) had decreased symptoms at 6 weeks, and of 85 patients, 60 (70.6%) had decreased symptoms at 12 weeks. The majority (82; 75.6%) completed all 12 weekly treatments and 45 (54.9%) completed 3 (median) monthly maintenance treatments. The most common reason for noncompliance was lack of efficacy. Visit copay, employment status, and distance to the clinic were not associated with failure to complete weekly treatments or progression to monthly maintenance.
CONCLUSION: Although most patients' symptoms decreased after weekly PTNS, nonadherence to maintenance and lack of efficacy may limit long-term feasibility. Copay and distance traveled were not associated with noncompliance.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29196071     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  What Is New in Neuromodulation?

Authors:  Courtenay K Moore; Jessica J Rueb; Samir Derisavifard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  National Trends in Neuromodulation for Urinary Incontinence Among Insured Adult Women and Men, 2004-2013: The Urologic Diseases in America Project.

Authors:  Una J Lee; Julia B Ward; Lydia Feinstein; Brian R Matlaga; Erline Martinez-Miller; Tamara Bavendam; Ziya Kirkali; Kathleen C Kobashi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Feasibility of Self-administered Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Bladder in Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Argyrios Stampas; Rose Khavari; Joel E Frontera; Suzanne L Groah
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Long-term real-life adherence of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in over 400 patients.

Authors:  Manon J Te Dorsthorst; John P F A Heesakkers; Michael R van Balken
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Real-life patient experiences of TTNS in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome.

Authors:  Manon Te Dorsthorst; Michael van Balken; Dick Janssen; John Heesakkers; Frank Martens
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2021-08-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.