Literature DB >> 29195913

Association of office and ambulatory blood pressure with blood lead in workers before occupational exposure.

Wen-Yi Yang1, Ljupcho Efremov1, Blerim Mujaj1, Zhen-Yu Zhang1, Fang-Fei Wei1, Qi-Fang Huang1, Lutgarde Thijs1, Thomas Vanassche2, Tim S Nawrot3, Jan A Staessen4.   

Abstract

In view of decreasing lead exposure and guidelines endorsing ambulatory above office blood pressure (BP) measurement, we reassessed association of BP with blood lead (BL) in 236 newly employed men (mean age, 28.6 years) without previous lead exposure not treated for hypertension. Office BP was the mean of five auscultatory readings at one visit. Twenty-four-hour BP was recorded at 15- and 30-minute intervals during wakefulness and sleep. BL was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Systolic/diastolic office BP averaged 120.0/80.7 mm Hg, and the 24-hour, awake, and asleep BP 125.5/73.6, 129.3/77.9, and 117.6/65.0 mm Hg, respectively. The geometric mean of blood lead was 4.5 μg/dL (interquartile range, 2.60-9.15 μg/dL). In multivariable-adjusted analyses, effect sizes associated with BL doubling were 0.79/0.87 mm Hg (P = .11/.043) for office BP and 0.29/-0.25, 0.60/-0.10, and -0.40/-0.43 mm Hg for 24-hour, awake, and asleep BP (P ≥ .33). Neither office nor 24-hour ambulatory hypertension was related to BL (P ≥ .14). A clinically relevant white coat effect (WCE; office minus awake BP, ≥20/≥10 mm Hg) was attributable to exceeding the systolic or diastolic threshold in 1 and 45 workers, respectively. With BL doubling, the systolic/diastolic WCE increased by 0.20/0.97 mm Hg (P = .57/.046). Accounting for the presence of a diastolic WCE, reduced the association size of office diastolic BP with BL to 0.39 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -0.20 to 1.33; P = .15). In conclusion, a cross-sectional analysis of newly hired workers before lead exposure identified the WCE as confounder of the association between office BP and BL and did not reveal any association between ambulatory BP and BL.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hypertension; lead; occupational medicine; white coat hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29195913     DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens        ISSN: 1878-7436


  5 in total

Review 1.  Public and occupational health risks related to lead exposure updated according to present-day blood lead levels.

Authors:  Yu-Ling Yu; Wen-Yi Yang; Azusa Hara; Kei Asayama; Harry A Roels; Tim S Nawrot; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 5.528

2.  Epidemiologic observations guiding clinical application of a urinary peptidomic marker of diastolic left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Zhang; Esther Nkuipou-Kenfack; Wen-Yi Yang; Fang-Fei Wei; Nicholas Cauwenberghs; Lutgarde Thijs; Qi-Fang Huang; Ying-Mei Feng; Joost P Schanstra; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Peter Verhamme; Harald Mischak; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2018-03-21

3.  Two-Year Responses of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure to First Occupational Lead Exposure.

Authors:  Yu-Ling Yu; Wen-Yi Yang; Lutgarde Thijs; Jesus D Melgarejo; Cai-Guo Yu; Dong-Mei Wei; Fang-Fei Wei; Tim S Nawrot; Zhen-Yu Zhang; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 4.  Interpretation of Population Health Metrics: Environmental Lead Exposure as Exemplary Case.

Authors:  Jan A Staessen; Lutgarde Thijs; Wen-Yi Yang; Cai-Guo Yu; Fang-Fei Wei; Harry A Roels; Tim S Nawrot; Zhen-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Letter to editor: Blood pressure, hypertension and lead exposure.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Yang; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.