Literature DB >> 29195796

A low gradient junction technique of craniospinal irradiation using volumetric-modulated arc therapy and its advantages over the conventional therapy.

B Sarkar1, A Munshi2, A Manikandan3, S Roy2, T Ganesh2, B K Mohanti2, A Pradhan4.   

Abstract

A technique using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) fields for craniospinal irradiation with low dose gradients at the field junction was tested for its sensitivity to positional inaccuracy. It was compared against the conventional three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy in terms of dose uniformity at the junction. Treatment plans generated for ten patients who received craniospinal irradiation (35Gy in 21 fractions) by VMAT technique at our centre were included in this study. For these patients, 3D conformal radiotherapy plans were also generated in addition to the VMAT treatment plans. Intentional shifting of the cranial field in the superior and then in the inferior directions was done, creating a gap or overlap between the fields. Consequent changes in dose distributions in these two plans to positional inaccuracies were studied. The 3D conformal radiotherapy plans showed large dose variations at the junction due to positional shifts as compared to the VMAT plans. With a 5mm superior shift of the cranial field isocentre creating a gap between the cranial and spinal fields, the magnitudes of under-dosing were 13.9±3.6Gy and 4.8±2.0Gy for 3D conformal radiotherapy and VMAT respectively. When the cranial field was moved by 5mm inferiorly creating an overlap between the fields, overdose to the effects of 10.3±4.0Gy and 4.9±1.3Gy were observed for the 3D conformal radiotherapy plans and VMAT plans respectively. The VMAT technique is insensitive to longitudinal setup errors (1-3mm) in patients because of the existence of low dose gradients at the junction between fields. This is unlike the 3D conformal radiotherapy plans which have steep dose gradients at the field edges and thus are highly sensitive to setup errors. Such an advantage for VMAT circumvents the need for dose feathering often practiced with the 3D conformal radiotherapy technique and makes the technique simpler to follow.
Copyright © 2017 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3DCRT; CSI; Changement de jonction; Craniospinal irradiation; Irradiation craniospinale; Junction shift; Low dose gradient technique; Technique de faible gradient de dose; VMAT

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29195796     DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.07.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Radiother        ISSN: 1278-3218            Impact factor:   1.018


  6 in total

1.  Art of publication: A beginner's guide to understanding the non-linear dynamics between research and publication.

Authors:  Biplab Sarkar
Journal:  Cancer Res Stat Treat       Date:  2021-06-30

2.  Evaluating the positional uncertainty of intrafraction, adjacent fields, and daily setup with the BrainLAB ExacTrac system in patients who are receiving craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Duan; Yibing Zhou; Hongya Dai; Lirong Zhao; Jindong Qian; Dingqiang Yang; Liwei Zhang; Can Luo; Guanghui Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Outcome and prognostic factors following palliative craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  Rami A El Shafie; Karina Böhm; Dorothea Weber; Kristin Lang; Fabian Schlaich; Sebastian Adeberg; Angela Paul; Matthias F Haefner; Sonja Katayama; Florian Sterzing; Juliane Hörner-Rieber; Sarah Löw; Klaus Herfarth; Jürgen Debus; Stefan Rieken; Denise Bernhardt
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 4.  Total marrow irradiation for hematopoietic malignancies using volumetric modulated arc therapy: A review of treatment planning studies.

Authors:  Pietro Mancosu; Luca Cozzi; Ludvig Paul Muren
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-08-29

5.  Preclinical validation and treatment of volumetric modulated arc therapy based total bone marrow irradiation in Halcyon™ ring gantry linear accelerator.

Authors:  Tanweer Shahid; Sourav Mandal; Subhra Snigdha Biswal; Arundhati De; Mukti Mukherjee; Sandipan Roy Chowdhury; Anupam Chakrapani; Kirubha George; Jibak Bhattacharya; Prosenjit Soren; Tanmoy Ghosh; Biplab Sarkar; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.309

6.  Impact of setup errors on multi-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy for craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Yongqiang Zhou; Yao Ai; Ce Han; Xiaomin Zheng; Jinling Yi; Congying Xie; Xiance Jin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.