V Muthee1, A F Bochner2, S Kang'a3, G Owiso4, W Akhwale5, S Wanyee6, N Puttkammer7. 1. International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Rose Avenue, Off Argwings Kodhek Road, Nairobi, Kenya. Electronic address: veronica.muthee@ucglobalprograms.org. 2. International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, United States; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States. Electronic address: bochner@uw.ed. 3. International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Rose Avenue, Off Argwings Kodhek Road, Nairobi, Kenya. Electronic address: samkanga@gmail.com. 4. International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Rose Avenue, Off Argwings Kodhek Road, Nairobi, Kenya. Electronic address: gowiso@itech-kenya.org. 5. International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Rose Avenue, Off Argwings Kodhek Road, Nairobi, Kenya. Electronic address: wakhwale@itech-kenya.org. 6. IntelliSOFT Consulting Limited and Kenya Health Informatics Association, Argwings Kodhek Road, Nairobi, Kenya. Electronic address: swanyee@intellisoftkenya.com. 7. International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH), Department of Global Health, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, United States. Electronic address: nputt@uw.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Electronic medical record (EMR) systems can yield many benefit; however, facilities need to meet certain requirements before they are able to successfully implement an EMR. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of conducting EMR readiness assessments (ERAs) to assess readiness of public facilities in Kenya for deployment of an EMR. METHOD: I-TECH supported the Ministry of Health to deploy KenyaEMR, an HIV/AIDS care and treatment EMR developed using the OpenMRS platform, at over 300 healthcare facilities in Kenya. The ERA tool was designed to assess site readiness for KenyaEMR deployment. The assessments measured health facility internal environment in terms of available resources, security, technical infrastructure, and leadership buy-in and support from MOH and stakeholders for EMR implementation. RESULTS: From September 2012 to September 2014, a total of 381facilities received at least one ERA. Of these, 343facilities were rated as highly or moderately prepared to adopt an EMR system and proceeded to EMR deployment. 61% of these sites were set up to implement KenyaEMR at point of care, while 39% were set up to implement KenyaEMR for retrospective data entry. Across 38facilities not implemented with an EMR, common reasons that prevented the implementation were lack of reliable power, security issues such as lack of grills on the windows and un-lockable doors, and existence of another EMR system at the site. CONCLUSIONS: ERAs conducted in a single day site visit were feasible and were instrumental in determining facilities' EMR implementation decision. Performing ERAs stimulated engagement of facility-level personnel to cultivate a fertile environment for EMR adoption and ownership. The assessments further assisted in resource mobilization, remediation of barriers to deployment, and increased buy-in from Ministry of Health leadership to support EMR implementation work.
INTRODUCTION: Electronic medical record (EMR) systems can yield many benefit; however, facilities need to meet certain requirements before they are able to successfully implement an EMR. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of conducting EMR readiness assessments (ERAs) to assess readiness of public facilities in Kenya for deployment of an EMR. METHOD: I-TECH supported the Ministry of Health to deploy KenyaEMR, an HIV/AIDS care and treatment EMR developed using the OpenMRS platform, at over 300 healthcare facilities in Kenya. The ERA tool was designed to assess site readiness for KenyaEMR deployment. The assessments measured health facility internal environment in terms of available resources, security, technical infrastructure, and leadership buy-in and support from MOH and stakeholders for EMR implementation. RESULTS: From September 2012 to September 2014, a total of 381facilities received at least one ERA. Of these, 343facilities were rated as highly or moderately prepared to adopt an EMR system and proceeded to EMR deployment. 61% of these sites were set up to implement KenyaEMR at point of care, while 39% were set up to implement KenyaEMR for retrospective data entry. Across 38facilities not implemented with an EMR, common reasons that prevented the implementation were lack of reliable power, security issues such as lack of grills on the windows and un-lockable doors, and existence of another EMR system at the site. CONCLUSIONS: ERAs conducted in a single day site visit were feasible and were instrumental in determining facilities' EMR implementation decision. Performing ERAs stimulated engagement of facility-level personnel to cultivate a fertile environment for EMR adoption and ownership. The assessments further assisted in resource mobilization, remediation of barriers to deployment, and increased buy-in from Ministry of Health leadership to support EMR implementation work.
Authors: Martin Chieng Were; Simon Savai; Benard Mokaya; Samuel Mbugua; Nyoman Ribeka; Preetam Cholli; Ada Yeung Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 5.428