Literature DB >> 29195613

Interim FDG-PET Imaging in Lymphoma.

Andrea Gallamini1, Colette Zwarthoed2.   

Abstract

In the present article, the authors reviewed the rationale of FDG-PET/CT performed at an interim time point during therapy (iPET), focusing on the transition from standard, anatomical assessment of tumor shrinkage with CT to document a chemotherapy response, to the use of functional imaging with PET to assess chemosensitivity of the individual tumor. The prognostic or predictive role of iPET in different lymphoma subsets has been reviewed, with particular emphasis on early and advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. A large body of evidence exists in most lymphoma subtypes stressing the role of iPET for early chemotherapy response during first-line chemotherapy treatment, but an increased number of reports have recently been published focusing on the role of iPET in relapsed or refractory lymphoma to predict treatment outcome. Varying patterns of FDG uptake was observed across various lymphoma entities; hence, interpretation of FDG-PET scans should be in the context of the tumor architecture and the prevalence of cellular population, in particular, neoplastic vs non-neoplastic inflammatory cells present in tissue microenvironment. In the second part of the article, the authors reviewed the iPET-response adapted clinical trials and the clinical benefits of this strategy compared to standard non-PET adapted therapy. In particular, the authors extrapolated the reproducibility of FDG-PET image interpretation and the feasibility of a timely treatment adaptation based on FDG-PET results in daily clinical practice. This is essential for the reader, as the iPET-adapted strategy has become the standard of care in both early- and advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma, and, in the future, probably this strategy will be expanded to primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29195613     DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  7 in total

1.  Value of early evaluation of treatment response using 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and the Epstein-Barr virus DNA load for prediction of outcome in patients with primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-Hung Chen; Kai-Ping Chang; Sung-Chao Chu; Tzu-Chen Yen; Ling-Yi Wang; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Cheng-Lung Hsu; Shu-Hang Ng; Shu-Hsin Liu; Sheng-Chieh Chan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Evaluation of planar bioluminescence imaging and microPET/CT for therapy monitoring in a mouse model of pigmented metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Ewa Pasquereau-Kotula; Benoit Hosten; Fortune Hontonnou; Nicolas Vignal; Florent Antoni; Jean-Luc Poyet; Nathalie Rizzo-Padoin; Laure Sarda-Mantel
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-12-20

3.  FDG PET/CT findings and post-treatment changes of COVID-19 pneumonia in a patient with lymphoma: A case report.

Authors:  Joy Matsui; Asha Kandathil; Fangyu Peng
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET in diffuse large cell lymphoma: results from the CALGB 50303 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Mei-Yin C Polley; Michael V Knopp; Nathan Hall; Lale Kostakoglu; Jun Zhang; Howard R Higley; Gary Kelloff; Heshan Liu; Andrew D Zelenetz; Bruce D Cheson; Nina Wagner-Johnston; Brad S Kahl; Jonathan W Friedberg; Eric D Hsi; John P Leonard; Lawrence H Schwartz; Wyndham H Wilson; Nancy L Bartlett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 25.476

5.  An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  Jad S Husseini; Bárbara Juarez Amorim; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Vinay Prabhu; David Groshar; Lale Umutlu; Ken Herrmann; Lina García Cañamaque; José Ramón García Garzón; William E Palmer; Pedram Heidari; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Jacob Sosna; Cristina Matushita; Juliano Cerci; Marcelo Queiroz; Valdair Francisco Muglia; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa; Ronald J H Borra; Thomas C Kwee; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Laura Evangelista; Marco Salvatore; Alberto Cuocolo; Andrea Soricelli; Christian Herold; Andrea Laghi; Marius Mayerhoefer; Umar Mahmood; Ciprian Catana; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Bruce Rosen; Onofrio A Catalano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Progression Free Survival and Predictor of Recurrence in DLBCL patients with Negative Interim 18FDG PET/CT Using Standardized Imaging and Reporting Protocols.

Authors:  Maseeh Uz Zaman; Nosheen Fatima; Areeba Zaman; Unaiza Zaman; Sidra Zaman; Rabia Tahseen
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-08-01

Review 7.  Apoptosis Imaging in Oncology by Means of Positron Emission Tomography: A Review.

Authors:  Christophe Van de Wiele; Sezgin Ustmert; Bart De Spiegeleer; Pieter-Jan De Jonghe; Mike Sathekge; Maes Alex
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.