Literature DB >> 29194779

Pathological kinematic patterns of the tarsal complex in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity.

Chen Wang1, Heng Wang1, Shengxuan Cao1, Shaobai Wang2,3, Xin Ma1, Xu Wang1, Jiazhang Huang1, Chao Zhang1, Li Chen1, Xiang Geng1, Kan Wang4.   

Abstract

The in vivo kinematic characteristics of the tarsal joints during gait stance phase were still unclear in adult-acquired foot deformity (AAFD). This study included seven healthy subjects (14 feet) and 12 stage II AAFD patients (14 feet). The 3D models of tarsal bones were reconstructed based on CT scan. Each subject took standard gait on the single fluoroscopy system. Continuous lateral fluoroscopic images were collected. The key postures during the stance phase were selected. The 2D-3D registration technique was applied to explore the spatial motions of the tarsal joints in 6 degrees of freedom (DOF). During the whole stance phase, the AAFD talo-navicular joint (TNJ) exhibited ROM of 13 ± 6° in the sagittal plane while the normal subjects showed ROM of 7 ± 3° (p = 0.004). In AAFD, the subtalar joint (STJ) demonstrated 19 ± 8° and 7 ± 3° of motion in coronal and horizontal plane, respectively, while the normal subjects showed 14 ± 4°(p = 0.031) and 11 ± 3° (p = 0.014) of motion, respectively. Additionally STJ of AAFD patients showed significantly less dorsiflexion during the weight acceptance and showed significantly less external rotation both during the weight acceptance and single limb support of stance phase. In conclusion, for stage II AAFD patients, the talonavicular joint and the subtalar joint showed hypermobility in dorsi/planterflexion and inversion/eversion, respectively, during the gait stance phase while the internal/external rotation of the subtalar joint was reduced. The current study improves our understanding of the pathological kinematics of the tarsal complex in AAFD patients. Notice should be taken about these tarsal joints mobility in AAFD during clinical practice.
© 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:477-482, 2019. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D-3D registration; flatfoot; in vivo kinematics; tarsal joints

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29194779     DOI: 10.1002/jor.23821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  2 in total

1.  The Rotational Positioning of the Bones in the Medial Column of the Foot: A Weightbearing CT Analysis.

Authors:  Eli Schmidt; Thiago Silva; Daniel Baumfeld; Kevin N Dibbern; Hee Young Lee; John Femino; Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur; Cesar de Cesar Netto
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

2.  Comparison of in vivo hindfoot joints motion changes during stance phase between non-flatfoot and stage II adult acquired flatfoot.

Authors:  Zhenhan Deng; Zijun Cai; Siyu Chen; Yan Liu; Fanglin Chen; Zhiqin Deng; Yusheng Li; Jian Xu
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.050

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.